Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T18:32:19.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cleveland's Street Railway Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

T. L. Sidlo
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News and Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 1910 , pp. 279 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1910

References

1 Annual Report for the Year Ending Dec. 31, 1908, of the Public Service Commission of New York, for the First District, vol. 1, pp. 177 et seq.

2 Mayor Johnson says “there are four vital defects in the street railway settlement:

The first is, the maximum fare is too high.

The second is, the valuation is too high.

The third is, the city's control by arbitration is too weak.

The fourth is, a friendly council can relieve the company of all the people's safeguards without a referendum vote.”

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.