Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:53:49.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civic Virtue and Self-Interest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Christopher M. Duncan  and
Shelley Burtt
Christopher M. Duncan
Affiliation:
Mississippi State University
Shelley Burtt
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this Review in 1993 Shelley Burtt critiqued contemporary republican theorists who urge a reinvigorated citizenry steeped in the ideal of civic virtue. Christopher Duncan finds the essence of Burtt's argument to be that such a revival is not feasible given the level of self-sacrifice required from citizens. He suggests, however, that contemporary republican theorists, like their ancient predecessor Aristotle, are not calling for altruism or the forsaking of self-interest. Rather, virtuous political participation rightly understood is, in fact, among the highest forms of self-interested behavior. Burtt replies that her earlier remarks discussed a part of the republican revival that had little to do with an Aristotelian politics of virtue, which indeed offers an attractive account of political life as a crucial element in individual self-fulfillment. But she notes also that liberalism rightly reminds us of the dangers of public mobilization and concentrated power; moreover, the political and practical obstacles to private reeducation of the citizenry remain.

Type
Controversies
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 147 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1984. “The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” Yale Law Journal 93:1013–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1976. Introduction to Aristotle's Ethics, trans. Thomson, J. A. K.. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N., Masden, Richard, Sullivan, William S., Swindler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven M.. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Budziszewski, J. 1994. “Politics of Virtues, Government of Knaves.” First Things, June/July, pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
Burtt, Shelley. 1990. “The Good Citizen's Psyche: On the Psychology of Civic Virtue.” Polity 23:23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, Shelley. 1993. “The Politics of Virtue Today: A Critique and a Proposal.” American Political Science Review 87:360–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Christopher M. 1995. The Anti-Federalists and Early American Political Thought. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen. 1987. City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1987. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. and Trans. Hoare, Quintin and Smith, Geoffrey Noweli. New York: International.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1954. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. N.d. “Community, Diversity, and Civic Education: Toward a Liberal Political Science of Group Life.” Social Philosophy and Policy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. 1988. “Law's Republic.” Yale Law Journal 97:1493–1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, Robert. 1990. The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom. San Francisco: ICS.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1993. “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz. The Multiple Traditions in America.” American Political Science Review 87:549–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1988. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97:1539–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. “Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael 1980. Radical Principles: Reflections of an Unreconstructed Democrat. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1988. The Company of Critics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Will, George 1980. Statecraft as Soulcraft. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.