Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:12:40.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Church and State in Stanley Fish's Antiliberalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J. Judd Owen
J. Judd Owen*
Affiliation:
Boston College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even though they contain one of the most forceful critiques of liberalism in contemporary political thought, the political writings of Stanley Fish have been neglected by political theorists. Fish's critique of liberal claims of moral and religious neutrality points to the conclusion that the liberal separation of church and state lacks a coherent justification. I offer a qualified defense of liberalism by arguing that while Fish's critique of liberal neutrality is sound, he fails to do justice to liberalism's substantive basis. Moreover, by simply negating liberalism, Fish's thinking remains within the liberal horizon in a way he fails to recognize.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 911 - 924
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beiner, Ronald. 1992. What's the Matter with Liberalism? Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, ed. 1996. Democracy and Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berns, Walter. [1976] 1985. The First Amendment and the Future of American Democracy. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar
Carter, Stephen. 1987. “Evolutionism, Creationism, and Treating Religion as a Hobby.” Duke Law Journal 1987 (December): 977–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Stephen. 1993. The Culture of Disbelief. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
D'Souza, Dinesh. 1995. The End of Racism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1967. Surprised by Sin. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1994. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1995. Professional Correctness: Literary Studies and Political Change. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1996a. “At the Federalist Society.” Howard Law Journal 39 (3): 719–35.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1996b. “Why We Can't All Just Get Along.” First Things (February): 18–26.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1996c. “Stanley Fish Replies to Richard John Neuhaus.” First Things (February): 33–40.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1997a. “Boutique Multiculturalism, or Why Liberals Are Incapable of Thinking about Hate Speech.” Critical Inquiry 23 (Winter): 378–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1997b. “Mission Impossible: Settling the Just Bounds between Church and State.” Columbia Law Review 97 (December): 2255–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. 1986. “Liberalism and Public Morality.” In Liberals on Liberalism, ed. Damico, Alfonso J.Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 129–47.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedicks, Frederick Mark. 1991. “The Religious, the Secular, and the Antithetical.” Capital University Law Review 20 (1): 113–45.Google Scholar
Gedicks, Frederick Mark. 1995. The Rhetoric of Church and State: A Critical Analysis of Religion Clause Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gedicks, Frederick Mark, and Hendrix, Roger. 1991. Choosing the Dream: The Future of Religion in American Public Life. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. [1651] 1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. [1787] 1954. Notes on the State of Virginia. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1943. The Complete Thomas Jefferson. Ed. Padover, Saul K.New York: Tudor.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1784] 1970. “An Answer to the Question ‘What is Enlightenment?’” In Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 54–60.Google Scholar
Kepel, Gilles. 1994. The Revenge of God: The Resurgence of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism in the Modern World. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1988. Constitutional Faith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1990. “The Confrontation of Religious Faith and Civil Religion: Catholics Become Justices.” DePaul Law Review 39 (4): 1047–81.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1689] 1983. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1693] 1994. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1695] 1965. The Reasonableness of Christianity. Chicago: Henry Regnery.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1990. Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, George M. 1994. The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Nonbelief. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, George M. 1996. “Letter to the Editor.” First Things (June/July): 3.Google Scholar
Milton, John. [1667] 1892. Paradise Lost. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. [1748] 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Trans. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia Carolyn, and Stone, Harold Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1991. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neal, Patrick. 1994. “Does He Mean What He Says? (Mis)Understanding Rawls's Practical Turn.” Polity 27 (1): 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1994. “Skepticism about Practical Reason in Literature and the Law.” Harvard Law Review 107 (3): 714–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. Judd. 1997. “Review of Stanley Fish, Professional Correctness: Literary Studies and Political Change.” In Books in Canada: The Canadian Review of Books 26 (8): 32–4.Google Scholar
Owen, J. Judd. N.d. Religion and the Demise of Liberal Rationalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. 1973. Montesquieu's Philosophy of Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1991. Love and Power: The Role of Religion and Morality in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1993. “Further Thoughts—and Second Thoughts—on Love and Power.” San Diego Law Review 30 (4): 702–28.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1968. The Republic of Plato. Trans. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1984. The Apology of Socrates. Trans. West, Thomas and West, Starry. In Four Texts on Socrates, ed. West, Thomas and West, Starry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Pp. 63–97.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Vol. 1 of Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schanck, Peter C. 1992. “Understanding Postmodern Thought and Its Implications for Statutory Interpretation.” Southern California Law Review 65 (6): 2505–97.Google Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna. 1989. “Outlaw Blues.” Michigan Law Review 87 (May): 1418–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolin, David. 1991. “Regulating Religious and Cultural Conflict in Postmodern America: A Response to Professor Perry.” Iowa Law Review 76 (4): 1067–104.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de. [1670] 1989. Tractatus Theologico-politicus. Trans. Shirley, Samuel. Leiden, NL: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, Nomi Maya. 1993. “He Drew a Circle that Shut Me Out: Assimilation, Indoctrination, and the Paradox of a Liberal Education.” Harvard Law Review 106 (8): 582–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1965. “Comments on Der Bergriffdes Politschen by Carl Schmitt.” In Spinoza's Critique of Religion. New York: Schocken Books. Pp. 331–51.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1835] 1945. Democracy in America. 2 vols. Ed. Bradley, Phillips. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. 1988. Red, White, and Blue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.