Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:37:47.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing National Images: International Public Relations and Media Agenda Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Jarol B. Manheim  and
Robert B. Albritton
Jarol B. Manheim
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Robert B. Albritton
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research within the agenda-setting framework has generally ignored the potential influence of purposive efforts by external actors (those outside the political system) to manipulate media coverage related to their interests. The present study uses interrupted time-series analysis to examine one such set of manipulative efforts, those undertaken by professional public relations consultants to influence the images of foreign nations as portrayed in the United States press. Data represent New York Times coverage of six nations that signed public relations contracts with American firms during the period from 1974 to 1978, and one nation that expressly rejected such a contract. The analysis identifies consistent patterns of improvement along two primary dimensions of national image, visibility and valence, which are associated in time with the public relations contracts.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 641 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albritton, R. B., & Manheim, J. B.News of Rhodesia: the impact of a public relations campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 1983, 60, 622–628.Google Scholar
Azar, E. A., et al.The problem of source coverage in the use of international events data. International Studies Quarterly, 1972, 16, 373–388.Google Scholar
Becker, L. B.Foreign policy and press performance. Journalism Quarterly, 1977, 54, 364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L.News: the politics of illusion. New York: Longman, 1983.Google Scholar
Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J.The agenda-setting function of mass media at three levels of “information holding.” Communication Research, 1976, 3, 261–274.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T.Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, J., Shore, L., & Todd, R.The New York Times coverage of equatorial and lower Africa. Journal of Communication, 1979, 29, 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, R., & Elder, C.Participation in American politics: the dynamics of agenda-building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.The press and foreign policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.The public's impact on foreign policy. Boston: Little Brown, 1973.Google Scholar
Cook, F. L. Toward a theory of issue decline on policy agendas. Presented at the symposium on new directions in the empirical and normative study of public policy, Evanston, Illinois, 09 23, 1982.Google Scholar
Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Cordon, M. T., Protess, B., Leff, D. R., & Molotch, H. L.Media and agenda setting: effects on the public interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1983, 47, 16–35.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T.Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis of time series experiments. Boulder: Colorado Associate University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Cooney, J. E.Public relations firms draw fire for aiding repressive countries. Wall Street Journal, 01 3, 1979, 1, 30.Google Scholar
Davis, M.Interpreters for Nigeria: the third world and international public relations. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Davison, W. P.News media and international negotiation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974, 38, 174–193.Google Scholar
Elder, C., & Cobb, R.The political uses of symbols. New York: Longman, 1983.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. J.News from nowhere: Television in the news. New York: Vintage, 1973.Google Scholar
Eyal, C.Timeframe in agenda-setting research: a study of the conceptual and methodological factors affecting the timeframe context of the agenda-setting process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, as cited in McCombs, M. E. The agenda-setting approach. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981.Google Scholar
Graber, D. A.Hoopla and horse-race in 1980 campaign coverage: a closer look. In Schulz, W. & Schoenbach, K. (Eds.), Mass media and elections: international research perspectives. München: Olschlager, 1983.Google Scholar
Graber, D.Processing the news: how people tame the information tide. New York: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar
Grau, C. H.What publications are most frequently quoted in the Congressional Record. Journalism Quarterly, 1976, 53, 716–719.Google Scholar
Hopple, G. W.International news coverage in two elite newspapers. Journal of Communication, 1982, 32, 61–74.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R.Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 848–858.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. P.Econometric methods (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
Kecskemeti, P.Propaganda. In de S. Pool, I.et al. (Eds.), Handbook of communication. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1973.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C., & Ezekiel, R. S.Cross-national encounters: the personal impact of an exchange program for broadcasters. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1970.Google Scholar
Kiesler, C. A., Collins, B. E., & Miller, N.Attitude change: a critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York: John Wiley, 1969.Google Scholar
Krugman, H. E.The impact of television advertising: learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1965, 29, 349–356.Google Scholar
Lent, J. A.Foreign news in American media. Journal of Communication, 1977, 27, 46–51.Google Scholar
Marcum, J.The Angolan revolution (vol. 1). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1972, 36, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, W. J.Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1964, 1, 192–202.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, H.Some reasons why information campaigns can succeed. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1973, 37, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, R. L.Transforming international communications strategies. Political Communication and Persuasion, 1980, 1, 5–42.Google Scholar
Miller, A. H., Goldenberg, E. N., & Erbring, L.Typeset politics: impact of newspapers on public confidence. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 67–84.Google Scholar
Nimmo, D., & Savage, R. L.Candidates and their images: concepts, methods and findings. Pacific Palisades: Goodyear, 1976.Google Scholar
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y.Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 1983, 77, 175–190.Google Scholar
Palmgreen, P., & Clarke, P.Agenda-setting with local and national issues. Communication Research, 1977, 4, 435–452.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. E., & McClure, R. D.The unseeing eye: the myth of TV power in national elections. New York: G. P. Putman's Sons, 1976.Google Scholar
Peterson, S.International news selection by the elite press. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1981, 45, 143–163.Google Scholar
Ptacek, P., Kricos, P. B., Black, J. W., & Hyman, M.Titles as measures of trends in research and training. General Semantics, 1975, 42, 198–201.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. P., & Hefner, R.Perceptual maps of the world. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1968, 52, 271–280.Google Scholar
Savage, R. L.The diffusion of information approach. In Nimmo, D. D. & Sanders, K. R. (Eds.), Handbook of political communication. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981.Google Scholar
Semmel, A. K.Foreign news in four U.S. elite dailies: some comparisons. Journalism Quarterly, 1976, 53, 732–736.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. L., & McCombs, M. E.The emergence of American political issues: the agenda-setting function of the press. St. Paul: West, 1977.Google Scholar
Sigal, L. V.Reporters and officials: the organization and politics of newsmaking. Lexington: D.C. Heath, 1973.Google Scholar
Smith, D. D.Some effects of Radio Moscow's North American broadcasts. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1970, 54, 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, G. C., & McCombs, M. E.Tracing the time-lag in agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 1981, 58, 51–55.Google Scholar
U.K. plans ads to support deployment of missiles. Wall Street Journal, 01 31, 1983, p. 33.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. H.What America's leaders read. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974, 38, 1–22.Google Scholar
Wincrich, E.Rhodesian “information.”New York Times, 05 13, 1977, p. 27.Google Scholar
Winter, J. P., & Eyal, C. E.Agenda setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1981, 45, 376–383.Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, G.International Awareness, Information processing, and attitude change: a cross-cultural experimental study. Political Communication and Persuasion, 1983, 2, 127–146.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.