Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:22:43.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Liberals Punish?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Stanley C. Brubaker
Stanley C. Brubaker*
Affiliation:
Colgate University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Liberalism doubts that a sound theory of politics can be built from a theory of the human good. In pursuit of its authorized ends, the liberal state can establish incentives and disincentives, it can require reparations, and it can restrain dangerous persons. But can liberals punish? By distinguishing punishment from related phenomena and comparing its presuppositions with central tenets of liberalism, I tentatively conclude that they cannot. An analysis of efforts by leading liberal theorists to come to terms with punishment confirms that suspicion: their theories do not authorize punishment or do so at the expense of their more fundamental principles. I conclude that the ability to punish criminal is part of a larger moral experience and capacity that is lost with liberalism's expulsion of the human good from politics, and further, that without reference to the human good, liberalism's central concepts of liberty and equality are left weak and empty.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 821 - 836
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1980. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Brace. 1984. Reconstructing American Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1954. Rhetoric and Poetics. Trans. Roberts, W. Rhys and Bywater, Ingram. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1958. The Politics. Trans. Barker, Ernest. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare. 1963. On Crimes and Punishments. Trans. Paolucci, Henry. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Frithjof. 1977. On Being Free. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1979. For Capital Punishment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1982. Judicial Review and the Rights and Laws of Nature. Supreme Court Review 82:49–83.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Stanley C. 1982. Fear of Judging. Political Science Reviewer 12:207–42.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Stanley C. 1985. Taking Dworkin Seriously. Review of Politics 47:45–65.Google Scholar
Burton, Steve. 1982. Comment on “Empty Ideas”: Logical Positivist Analyses of Equality and Rules. Yale Law Journal 91:1126–52.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 1983. In Defense of Equality. Michigan Law Review 81:575–603.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1984. The Division of Labour in Society. Trans. Halls, W. D.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970. Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1985. Offense to Others. Vol. 2 of The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Benjamin. 1964. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. Ed. Larabee, L. W., et al. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1980. Justice and the Human Good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1982. Defending Liberalism. American Political Science Review 76:621–29.Google Scholar
Gardner, George K. 1953. Bailey v. Richardson and the Constitution of the United States. Boston University Law Review 33:176–203.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Arthur L. 1953. English Law and the Moral Law. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1983. How Empty Is the Idea of Equality? Columbia Law Review 83:1167–85.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1962. Law, Liberty, and Morality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Beck, Lewis White. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1965. The Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Trans. Ladd, John. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1952. The Second Treatise of Government. Ed. Peardon, Thomas. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1979. Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1981. H. L. A. Hart. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1959. On Liberty. Ed. Sheilds, Currin V.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1969. Utilitarianism. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Ed. Dryer, D. P.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. 1949. The Spirit of the Laws. Trans. Nugent, Thomas. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Morris, Norval. 1974. The Future of Imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1954. Thus Spoke Zarathrusta. In The Portable Nietzsche, ed. and trans. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1966. Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophic Explanations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Packer, Herbert. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1981. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1985. An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review 85:1193–1231.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1985. Justice As Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14:223–51.Google Scholar
Ross, William D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1890. The Methods of Ethics. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1883. History of Criminal Law in England. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1979. What's Wrong with Negative Liberty? In The Idea of Freedom, ed. Ryan, Alan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westen, Peter. 1982a. The Empty Idea of Equality. Harvard Law Review 95:537–99.Google Scholar
Westen, Peter. 1982b. On “Confusing Ideas”: A Reply. Yale Law Journal 91:1153–65.Google Scholar
Westen, Peter. 1983a. The Meaning of Equality in Law, Science, Math, and Morals: A Reply. Michigan Law Review 81:604–63.Google Scholar
Westen, Peter. 1983b. To Lure the Tarantula from Its Hole: A Response. Columbia Law Review 83:1186–1208.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q., and Herrnstein, Richard J.. 1985. Crime and Human Nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.