Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 12
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Erickson, Robert S. 1971. The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting. American Political Science Review, Vol. 65, Issue. 4, p. 1018.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1972. The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition. American Political Science Review, Vol. 66, Issue. 2, p. 555.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. and Davis, Morton D. 1974. The 3/2's Rule in Presidential Campaigning. American Political Science Review, Vol. 68, Issue. 1, p. 113.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel 1977. Presidential Popularity and Negative Voting: An Alternative Explanation of the Midterm Congressional Decline of the President's Party. American Political Science Review, Vol. 71, Issue. 1, p. 44.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 1979. The Impact of Presidential Coattails on Outcomes of Congressional Elections. American Politics Quarterly, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 94.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. 1981. Ain'T Misbehavin. American Politics Quarterly, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 3.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard W. and Hadley, David J. 1983. Presidential and Congressional Response to Political Crisis: Nixon, Congress, and Watergate. Congress & the Presidency, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 195.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Born, Richard 1984. Reassessing the Decline of Presidential Coattails: U. S. House Elections from 1952-80. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 60.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Praino, Rodrigo and Stockemer, Daniel 2012. Tempus Fugit, Incumbency Stays: Measuring the Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. Senate. Congress & the Presidency, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 160.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Neiheisel, Jacob R. and Niebler, Sarah 2013. The Use of Party Brand Labels in Congressional Election Campaigns. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 377.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mathew, Nicole Asmussen 2019. Dumping Trump and Electoral Bumps: The Causes and Consequences of Republican Officeholders’ Endorsement Decisions. The Forum, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 231.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hemphill, Libby and Shapiro, Matthew A. 2019. Appealing to the base or to the moveable middle? Incumbents’ partisan messaging before the 2016 U.S. congressional elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 325.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Campaign Strategy and Party Loyalty: The Electoral Relevance of Candidate Decision-Making in the 1964 Congressional Elections*
  • Volume 63, Issue 2
  • Robert A. Schoenbebger (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1954704
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Campaign Strategy and Party Loyalty: The Electoral Relevance of Candidate Decision-Making in the 1964 Congressional Elections*
  • Volume 63, Issue 2
  • Robert A. Schoenbebger (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1954704
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Campaign Strategy and Party Loyalty: The Electoral Relevance of Candidate Decision-Making in the 1964 Congressional Elections*
  • Volume 63, Issue 2
  • Robert A. Schoenbebger (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1954704
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.