Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:13:29.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bureaucracy that Kills: Federal Sovereign Immunity and the Discretionary Function Exception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2002

William G. Weaver
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0547 ([email protected]).
Thomas Longoria
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Public Administration, University of Kansas, 1541 Lilac Lane #318, Lawrence, KS, 66045-3177.

Abstract

Political scientists normally discuss sovereign immunity in the context of international law and relations. The domestic effects of sovereign immunity are almost never examined, even though those effects are profound and implicate a range of issues of interest to political scientists. The Federal Tort Claims Act (FCTA) (1946) is a main waiver of federal sovereign immunity and is designed to allow people injured by government employees to sue for money damages. The FTCA has a number of exceptions, the most prominent of which is known as the “discretionary function exception.” This exception retains sovereign immunity for the United States when a federal employee acts “based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty…whether or not the discretion involved be abused.” This simple exception expanded into a comprehensive tool of government that now confounds justice and federal governmental accountability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.