Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:34:55.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucracy in a Democracy - Bureaucracy in a Democracy. By Charles S. Hyneman. (New York: Harper and Brothers. 1950. Pp. xv, 586. $4.50.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Chester I. Barnard
Chester I. Barnard
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller Foundation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews, Notes, Notices and Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1950 , pp. 990 - 1004
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Red Tape,” Law Quarterly Review, Vol. 65, pp. 172–187 (April, 1949)Google Scholar.

2 Considering the common use of “responsibility” and “responsible” in connection with politics, government, and organization this is a matter of astonishment. The subject is not listed in the Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, although “Organization” and “Authority” are topics presented. The words apparently have no status in legal literature, being not listed in the Corpus Juris or in the index of the Harvard Law Review. It is a subject not listed in the Encyclopaedia Britannica. The only sustained discussion of the subject I have found is Fauconnet, Paul, La Responsabilité, Étude de Sociologie (2d ed., Paris, Librairie Félix Alcan, 1928)Google Scholar. This book is of value as respects the ethnic history of the concept, and as respects liability to criminal sanctions, but not for problems of responsibility in modern formal organizations.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.