Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:19:56.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Althusser's Marxism without a Knowing Subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Steven B. Smith
Steven B. Smith*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quest for unassailable “foundations” for knowledge has preoccupied Western thinkers at least since Descartes. Without some such foundation or Archimedian standpoint, it was argued, our knowledge of the external world as well as our basis for moral and political judgment would fall prey to relativism, historicism, and ultimately nihilism. Recently, though, this Cartesian quest for foundations has come under attack from some of the most powerful minds of our age.

In this article I examine the contribution of Louis Althusser to this current of thought and assess whether his critique of foundationalist epistemologies and ethics can avoid the pitfalls of relativism. Althusser is compared to other thinkers who share his anti-Cartesian persuasion (Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and Foucault) and is criticized for his use of a kind of structuralism to abolish the “knowing subject” as the locus of thought and action. I conclude that Althusser's “antihumanism” has produced a convenient ideology for a new class of Marxist intellectuals to exert their claims to power over ordinary human agents who have been reduced to “bearers” or “supports” of certain systemic, structural relations.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , September 1985 , pp. 641 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althusser, L. Essays in self-criticism (ESC) (Lock, G., Trans.). London: New Left Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. For Marx (FM) (Brewster, B., Trans.). London: Penguin Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. Reading capital (RC) (Brewster, B., Trans.). London: New Left Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. Lenin and philosophy and other essay (LP) (Brewster, B., Trans.). London: New Left Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. Politics and history: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx (PH) (Brewster, B., Trans.). London: New Left Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. Considerations on western Marxism. London: New Left Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. On violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1969.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to do things with words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Avineri, S. The social and political thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. La formation de l'esprit scientifique. Paris: J. Vrin, 1938.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. La nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1934.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. The philosophy of no: The philosophy of the new scientific mind (Waterson, G. C., Trans.). New York: Orion Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Berki, R. N. Socialism. New York: Saint Martin's, 1975.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. Beyond relativism and objectivism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. The restructuring of social and political theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Callinicos, A. Althusser's Marxism. London: Pluto Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. The new leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. An essay on metaphysics. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1972.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F. J. The twilight of subjectivity: Contributions to a post-individualist theory of politics. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Deprun, J. Y-a-t-il une “pratique theorique?” Structuralisme et marxisme. Paris: Union generate d'Edition, 1970.Google Scholar
Djilas, M. The new class. New York: Praeger, 1957.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. & Rabinow, P. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Eco, U. La Struttura assente. Milan: Bompiani, 1968.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. The order of things (Sheridan-Smith, A. M., Trans.). London: Tavistock, 1970.Google Scholar
Freud, S. Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis (Strachey, J., Trans.). New York: Norton, 1969.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. Truth and method. New York: Seabury Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Garaudy, R. Perspectives de l'homme: existentialisme, pensée catholique, structuralisme, marxisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1969.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. The legitimation of belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies. New York: Basic Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Goffman, I. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, 1959.Google Scholar
Gunnell, J. Political theory: Tradition and interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop, 1979.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1) (McCarthy, T., Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. What is universal pragmatics? Communication and the evolution of society. (McCarthy, T., Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hampshire, S. Spinoza. London: Penguin Books, 1962.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The phenomenology of mind (Bailie, J. Bb., Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin, 1971.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. Basic writings (Krell, D. F., Trans.). New York: Harper & Row, 1977.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. The prison-house of language: A critical account of structuralism and Russian formalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972.10.1515/9780691214313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolakowski, L. Karl Marx and the classical definition of truth. Marxism and humanism: Essays on the left today (Peel, J. Z., Trans.). New York: Grove Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L. Main currents of Marxism: Its rise, growth, and dissolution (Falla, P. S., Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Kristol, I. On corporate capitalism in America. In Glazer, N. & Kristol, I. (Eds.). The American commonwealth 1976. New York: Basic Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.10.1017/CBO9781139171434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecourt, D. L'epistemologie historique de Gaston Bachelard. Paris: Vrin, 1969.Google Scholar
Lecourt, D. Marxism and epistemology: Bachelard, Canguilhem, and Foucault (Brewster, B., Trans.). London: New Left Books, 1975.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science. Monist, 1977, 60, 453–472.10.5840/monist197760427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. Is understanding a religion compatible with believing? In Wilson, B. (Ed.). Rationality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar
Marx, K. Capital. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1970. (b)Google Scholar
Marx, K. The German ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1970. (a)Google Scholar
McCarney, J. The real world of ideology. New York: Humanities Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Miller, E. Positivism, historicism, and political inquiry. American Political Science Review, 1972, 66, 798–817.10.2307/1957479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, K. Marxisme ou structuralisme? In Vincent, J. M. (Ed.). Contre Althusser. Paris: Union Generale d'Edition, 1974.Google Scholar
Norman, R. Hegel's phenomenology: A philosophical introduction. Sussex: Harvester Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Parkin, F. Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. Languages and their implications: The transformation of the study of political thought. In Politics, Language, and Time. London: Methuen, 1971.Google Scholar
Popper, K. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Poster, M. Existential Marxism in postwar France: From Sartre to Althusser. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. Nihilism: A philosophical essay. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949.Google Scholar
Schaff, A. Structuralism and Marxism. New York: Pergamon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. Structure and history (Herf, J., Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Serle, J. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.10.1017/CBO9781139173438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, I. Realism in the study of the history of ideas. History of Political Thought, 1982, 3, 535–578.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 1969, 8, 1–53.10.2307/2504188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. B. Althusser and the overdetermined self. Review of Politics, 1984, 46, 516–538. (b)10.1017/S0034670500049214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. B. Reading Althusser: An essay on structural Marxism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984. (a)Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. de. The ethics (Elwes, R. H. M., Trans.). New York: Dover, 1951.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. Persecution and the art of writing. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. What is political philosophy and other studies. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Tarcov, N. Quentin Skinner's method and Machiavelli's “Prince.” Ethics, 1982, 92, 692–709.10.1086/292385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P. The poverty of theory and other essays. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Winch, P. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical investigations (Anscombe, G. E. M., Trans.). New York: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Wrong, D. The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 183–193.10.2307/2089854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetterbaum, M. Self and political order. Interpretation, 1971, 1, 233–246.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.