Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:15:28.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alexis de Tocqueville on Political Science, Political Culture, and the Role of the Intellectual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

James Ceaser
James Ceaser*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Tocqueville, the most important determinant of the character of any society is its political culture (moeurs). A political culture is shaped not only by sociological conditions and laws, but also, in modern times, by ideas propounded by intellectuals. In Tocqueville's day, two dominant schools of thought were contending for influence over the public mind in Europe: philosophe rationalism and traditionalism. Neither one of these schools, Tocqueville argued, promoted a political culture that could reconcile liberty and democracy. Tocqueville conceived his “new political science” as an alternative to these schools that could meet this challenge. Unlike the opposing schools, the new political science could not be propagated directly as an ideology. Its implementation relied on an indirect strategy—using institutions to inculcate certain “mental habits” among the citizens. This in turn called for ways of limiting the role of intellectuals in influencing political culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , September 1985 , pp. 656 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, R. Main currents in sociological thought. Vol. 1. Howard, R. & Weaver, H. (Trans.). Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Bell, D. The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Bourricaud, F. Le bricolage ideologique: essai sur les intellectuals et les passions democratiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1980.Google Scholar
Bruce-Briggs, B. (Ed.). The new class? New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Burke, E. Reflections on the revolution in France. Indianapolis: Liberal Arts Press, 1955. (Originally published, 1790.)Google Scholar
Chapman, G. Edmund Burke: The practical imagination. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967.10.4159/harvard.9780674331792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargan, E. De Tocqueville. New York: Hillary House, 1965.Google Scholar
Herr, R. Tocqueville and the old regime. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1962.10.1515/9781400879311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manent, P. Tocqueville et la nature de la democratie. Paris: Julliard, 1982.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. P. Alexis de Tocqueville. New York: Harper, 1960.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. Considerations on representative government. Shields, C. V. (Ed.). Indianapolis: Bobbs, Merrill, 1958.(Originally published, 1861.)Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. M. de Tocqueville on Democracy in America. In Cohen, M. (Ed.). The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. New York: Modern Library, 1961. (Originally published, 1840)Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. Tradition and revolt. New York: Vintage Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Pangle, T. Montesquieu's philosophy of liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.10.7208/chicago/9780226764948.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, B. Liberalism and tradition. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. Natural right and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. Democracy in America. Lawrence, G. (Trans.). New York: Anchor Books, 1968. (Originally published, 1835; Vol. 2 originally published, 1840)Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. The European revolution and correspondence with Gobineau (ER). Lukas, J. (Ed.). Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith, 1968.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. Journey to England and Ireland (JOURN). Lawrence, G. & Mayer, K. P. (Trans.). New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. Memoirs, letters, and remains of Alexis de Tocqueville (MEM) (2 vols.). Boston: Ticknor and Fields, 1862.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. The old regime and the French revolution (OR). Gilbert, S. (Trans.). Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor, 1955. (Originally published, 1856.)Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. Recollections (REC). Lawrence, G. (Trans.). New York: Anchor Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Zetterbaum, M. Tocqueville and the problem of democracy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.