Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:50:25.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age and Turnout in New Electorates and Peasant Societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1987

Richard G. Niemi
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Joel D. Barkan
Affiliation:
University of Iowa

Abstract

In established electorates in developed countries, voting turnout has a familiar curvilinear relationship with age. In new electorates, however, lack of experience and supposed resistance to new behavior among middle-aged voters suggest that turnout might be greater among the young. In peasant societies, the start-up costs that reduce turnout among young adults might not apply because of immobility of the population and resulting familiarity with local politics. Data from an early election in rural Kenya and from rural Turkey show that the familiar relationship holds even in these circumstances. The results suggest that increased electoral experience and resistance to newly available behavior do little to shape turnout. Mobility of the young, even in peasant populations, and psychological factors associated with aging are more powerful elements.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkan, Joel D. 1976. Further Reassessment of “Conventional Wisdom”: Political Knowledge and Voting Behavior in Rural Kenya. American Political Science Review 70:452–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, Joel D. 1987. The Electoral Process and Peasant-State Relations in Kenya. In Elections in Independent Africa, ed. Heyward, Fred M.. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Black, Jerome, Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, G. Bingham. N.d. Age, Resistance, and Political Learning in a New Environment: The Case of Canadian Immigrants. Comparative Politics. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1969. Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies 2: 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, Madan Lal. 1975. Political Participation in a Developing Nation: India. New York: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hayward, Fred. 1976. A Reassessment of Conventional Wisdom about the Informed Public: National Political Information in Ghana. American Political Science Review 70:433–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, Goran, and Leys, Colin. 1972. Election Politics in Single-Party Systems: The Case of Kenya and Tanzania. British Journal of Political Science 2:261–92.10.1017/S0007123400008784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Jacob M., Ozbudun, Ergun, and Tachau, Frank, eds. 1980. Electoral Politics in the Middle East. Stanford: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1959. Political Life. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W., and Goel, M. L.. 1977. Political Participation. 2d ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Stanley, Harold W., and Evans, C. Lawrence. 1984. Age and Turnout among the Newly Enfranchised: Life Cycle versus Experience Effects. European Journal of Political Science 12:371–86.10.1111/j.1475-6765.1984.tb00097.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanger, Clyde, and Nottingham, John. 1964. The Kenya General Elections of 1963. Journal of Modern African Studies 2:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiker, Walter F. 1981. The Modernization of Turkey. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.