Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:37:46.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Water Resources and American Federalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Albert Lepawsky
Albert Lepawsky
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Few functions of the American Federal system seem less suited physically to state boundaries than the management of our water resources. The reason is readily apparent. Water flows according to drainage districts and not the riverbounded or rectilinear areas of the American states. Nevertheless, it takes more than topography to delineate the states or provinces of a nation; there are historical and constitutional factors to consider. Once provincial areas are established as states under a national constitution, and, such functions as water supply are assigned to these states, it is not only difficult but it may also be disruptive to withdraw such a function from them, even though physical facts and technological changes cry for this solution.

Type
Government and Water Resources
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1950 , pp. 631 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Peet, Herbert M., “The Cooperative Approach to Basin Development”, Address to the Northwest Scientific Association at Spokane, Washington, December 28, 1949Google Scholar.

2 Address to the Red River Valley Association, at Shreveport, Louisiana, April 11, 1950.

3 Consult the following: Mason, William P., Water-supply (New York, 1909)Google Scholar; Rostovtzeff, Michael, A Large Estate in Egypt in the Third Century, B.C. (Madison, 1922)Google Scholar; Louis Joseph Delaporte, Mesopotamia; The Babylonian and Assyrian Civilization (New York, 1925)Google Scholar; Stein, M. Aurel, Ruins of Desert Cathay (London, 1912)Google Scholar; Markham, Clement, The Incas of Peru (New York, 1910)Google Scholar.

4 Part I, Third Day.

5 Reid, Kenneth A., “States' Wrongs”, Outdoors, p. 13 (July, 1946)Google Scholar.

6 McGrane, Reginald C., Foreign Bondholders and American State Debts (New York, 1935), p. 6Google Scholar; Faulkner, Harold U., American Economic History (New York, 1924), pp. 340–342Google Scholar.

7 Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government, Task Force Report on Public Works (Washington, 1949), p. 32Google Scholar.

8 House of Representatives Document No. 83, 18th Cong., 2d Sess. (1825); see also note 10 below.

9 Hynning, Clifford J., State Conservation of Resources (Washington, National Resources Committee, 1939), p. 47Google Scholar.

l0 Although President John Quincy Adams' plan for a national system of public improvements was defeated, it represented a wide-spread line of thought in its day. See below, Sec. VII, note 83.

11 Monohan, A. C., “Canals Retain Importance”, Science Newsletter, Vol. 53, pp. 90–91 (February 7, 1948)Google Scholar; “The Last Link”, Time, Vol. 53, p. 80 (June 27, 1949)Google Scholar; “Canal Project Charted”, Business Week, p. 47 (March 16, 1946)Google Scholar; “Transportation by Water Has Been Extended and Made Faster”, Building America, Vol. 13, p. 10 (November, 1948.)Google Scholar

12 Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1 (1824).

13 See the New River Case discussed below, Sec. VII.

14 Federal-State Relations, Senate Document No. 81, 81st Cong., 1st Sess., p. 24 (March 25, 1949).

15 See note 7 above.

16 Lepawsky, Albert, State Planning and Economic Development in the South (Washington, 1949), pp. 76, 77Google Scholar.

17 Ibid., p. 77.

18 See Raschig, Frank L., “The Ohio”, State Government, Vol. 19, pp. 230, 231, 238 (September, 1946)Google Scholar.

19 Lepawsky, op. cit., p. 42; Caldwell, Lynton K., “Interstate Cooperation in River Basin Development”, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 32, p. 237 (January, 1947)Google Scholar.

20 Lepawsky, op. cit., pp. 38–42.

21 See the Annual Reports of the Department of Interior.

22 14 Stat. 253 (1866).

23 Carey Act of 1894, 28 Stat. 422 (1894); 43 U.S.C. 641 (1940).

24 32 Stat. 388 (1902); 43 U.S.C. 372 (1940). See also Caldwell, op. cit., p. 235.

25 Hutchins, Wells A., Selected Problems in the Law of Water Rights in the West (Washington, 1942)Google Scholar; U. S. Department of Agriculture, State Legislation for Better Land Use (Washington, 1941)Google Scholar.

26 Friedrich, Julius M., “The Settlement of Disputes Between States Concerning Rights to the Waters of Interstate Streams”, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 32, p. 282 (January, 1947)Google Scholar.

27 Hynning, op. cit., p. 58.

28 National Resources Committee, Water Planning (Washington, February, 1938)Google Scholar; Mississippi Board of Development and U. S. Department of Agriculture, Summary Report of Organized Drainage Districts in Mississippi (Washington, April, 1941)Google Scholar; Research, Planning and Development Board, Ground-Water Investigation in South Carolina (Bulletin No. 15, 1946)Google Scholar.

29 See for example, the case of Oklahoma, in Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board, Oklahoma Water (1945).

30 See below, Sec. VI.

31 Hynning, op. cit., p. 56.

32 U. S. Department of Interior, Annual Report; Fish and Wild Life Service (Washington, 1949), p. 253Google Scholar.

33 Bromfield, Louis, “Poor Land, Poor Hunting”, Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 185, p. 63 (April, 1950)Google Scholar.

34 Florida State Improvement Commission, Organization and Administration (1945–1946)Google Scholar.

35 Ibid., p. 6.

36 Nation-Wide Inventory of Sanitation Needs, Supplement No. 204 of the Public Health Reports, p. 5 (April, 1948)Google Scholar.

37 Ibid., p. 3.

38 Ibid., p. 5; Chapman, Oscar L., “Will There Be Enough Water for You?” American Magazine, Vol. 149, pp. 24, 25 (February, 1950)Google Scholar.

39 A Reporter at Large, “The Gathered Waters”, New Yorker, Vol. 25, pp. 24–37 (December 31, 1949)Google Scholar; consult also the daily reports in the New York Times.

40 See Morris, Samuel B., “The Water Problem of Los Angeles”, Department of Water and Power, City of Los Angeles, p. 8 (May, 1948)Google Scholar; also the daily press reports.

41 United States Public Health Service, Variations in State Public Health Programs (1948)Google Scholar.

42 Nation-Wide Inventory of Sanitation Needs, op. cit., p. 3.

43 “Water Supply and Sanitation”, Engineering News-Record, Vol. 144, p. 119 (March 23, 1950)Google Scholar.

44 Idem.

45 Kent, J. L. in Life and Health (September, 1949)Google Scholar; Wolf, Bill in Sports Afield (September, 1948–March, 1949)Google Scholar; Winters, R. M. in American Life (January 25, 1950)Google Scholar.

46 Chattanooga Times, January 25, 1950.

47 See the reports of the Tennessee Stream Pollution Study Board and of the Tennessee State Planning Commission.

48 See also the reports of the Michigan Stream Control Commission; consult Public Administration Clearing House, News Bulletin (February 15, 1950).

49 For a typical case of the effect on industrial location, see Lepawsky, op. cit., p. 40.

50 Nation-Wide Inventory of Sanitation Needs, op. cit., p. 2; also, Engineering News Record, Vol. 137, pp. 112, 113 (November 14, 1946)Google Scholar.

51 National Resources Committee, Water Pollution in the United States (Washington, 1939), p. 35Google Scholar.

52 Saville, Thorndike, “Control of Interstate Water Pollution”, Journal of the Boston Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 25, pp. 293 ff. (April, 1938)Google Scholar; see also his “Administrative Control of Water Pollution”, Transactions of the American Institute of Civil Engineers (1931)Google Scholar; Wolman, Abel, “State and Other Functions in the Control and Abatement of Water Pollution in the United States”, Modern Sewage Disposal, Anniversary Book of the Federation of Sewage Works Associations (New York, 1938)Google Scholar, Ch. 25.

53 National Resources Committee, Water Pollution in the United States, op. cit., pp. 70, 71.

54 United States Public Health Service, State Water Pollution Control Legislation, p. 1 (February 17, 1949)Google Scholar.

55 Idem.

56 National Resources Committee, Special Advisory Committee on Water Pollution, Report on Water Pollution (Washington, 1936), pp. 63–65Google Scholar.

57 Saville, op. cit., pp. 297 ff.

58 Congressional Record, Vol. 84, Part 5, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., p. 4852 (April 24, 1939–May 18, 1939)Google Scholar.

59 Schwob, Charles E., “The National Water Pollution Program”, address to annual meeting of the American Fisheries Society, at Winnipeg, Canada, September, 1949Google Scholar.

60 Idem.

61 Idem.

62 Public Law 845, 80th Cong., Sec. 2, d (2), (3) and (4).

63 See the proceedings of the Annual Conference of State and Territorial Health Officers with the United States Public Health Service.

64 Greene, L. S., Brown, V. H., Iverson, E. A., Rescued Earth (Knoxville, 1948), pp. 1–50Google Scholar. Satterfield, M. H., “TVA—State-Local Relationships”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 40, pp. 935–950 (October, 1946)Google Scholar.

65 Twentieth Century Fund, Electric Power and Government Policy (New York, 1948)Google Scholar.

66 U.S.v. Appalachian Electric Power Co., 311 U.S. 377 (1940).

67 Scott, J. W., “Is Federal Control of Water Power Development Incompatible with State Interests?” George Washington Law Review, Vol. 9, pp. 631–647 (April, 1941)Google Scholar.

68 Idem.; see also the Proceedings of the Southern Appalachian Power Conference, Asheville, North Carolina, 1922, and Chattanooga, Tennessee, 1927.

69 See Lepawsky, op. cit., p. 59.

70 Ibid., p. 40; Twentieth Century Fund, op. cit., pp. 552–564, passim.

71 Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government, Task Force Report on Water Resources Projects (Washington, 1949), p. 7Google Scholar.

72 Scott, op. cit., pp. 643–646.

73 Hynning, op. cit., pp. 61, 62.

74 Graves, W. Brooke, American State Government (Boston, 1945), pp. 452, 453Google Scholar; MacDonald, Austin F., American State Government and Administration (New York, 1950), pp. 576, 577Google Scholar.

75 Caldwell, op. cit., p. 234.

76 Stone, Clifford H., “The Colorado”, State Government, Vol. 19, pp. 234–236 (September, 1946)Google Scholar; Friedrich, op. cit., pp. 274–276; Clark, Jane Perry, The Rise of a New Federalism (New York, 1938)Google Scholar.

77 Council of State Governments, Federal-State Relations, Senate Document No. 81, 81st Cong., 1st Sess., p. 43 (July 31, 1948)Google Scholar; “Interstate Compacts, 1934–1947”, Book of the States, Vol. 3, pp. 28–34 (1948–1949)Google Scholar. See also the series of articles in State Government, Vol. 19 (September, 1946)Google Scholar.

78 Clark, op. cit., p. 33; Caldwell, op. cit., p. 239.

79 Raschig, op. cit., pp. 230–238.

80 246 U.S. 565 (1918); Clark, op. cit., pp. 78, 79. See also Friedrich, op. cit., p. 265, and Reid, Kenneth A., “Pollution Control”, State Government, Vol. 18, pp. 30–32 (February, 1945)Google Scholar.

81 Gallagher, Hubert, “Solving Pollution Problems in the Potomac River Basin”, Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (1950)Google Scholar; Sothoron, L. Harold, “The Potomac”, State Government, Vol. 19, pp. 222, 223 (September, 1946)Google Scholar.

82 Allen, James H., “The Delaware River Basin Integrated Water Project”, Address to Annual Meeting of the Lehigh Valley Flood Control Council at Northampton, Pennsylvania, February 2, 1950Google Scholar.

83 Letter, John Quincy Adams to the Rev. Charles W. Upham, February 2, 1837, in Adams, Henry, The Degradation of the Democratic Dogma (New York, 1919), pp. 24, 25Google Scholar; Gallatin, Albert, American State Papers, Class X, Miscellaneous, Vol. 1, pp. 724–921Google Scholar, discussed at length by Goodrich, Carter, “National Planning of Internal Improvements”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 63, pp. 16–44 (March, 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Speech before the Society of American Foresters, March 26, 1903. See Proceedings of a Conference of Governors in the White House (Washington, 1909), pp. 3–13Google Scholar.

85 Ibid., pp. 135, 136, 357–359.

86 Ibid., pp. vi, 3, 13, 24, 237–258; National Conservation Commission, Report, Vol. 1, Senate Documents, Vol. X, 60th Cong., 2d Sess., pp. 46–49, 127 (1908–1909)Google Scholar.

87 Ibid., pp. 3, 6, 27, 47, 130–133.

88 Mathews, John L., The Conservation of Water (Boston, 1910)Google Scholar.

89 (New York), pp. 5–7.

90 National Resources Committee, Drainage Basin Problems and Programs (Washington, 1937), pp. 1–3Google Scholar.

91 Council of State Governments, Federal-State Relations, op. cit., p. 133; “Incodel”, The Interstate Commission on the Delaware River Basin: A Decade of Planned Progress, p. 17 (1936–1946)Google Scholar; see also Wolman, Abel, “Wanted—A National Water Policy”, State Government, Vol. 19, pp. 215 ff. (September, 1946)Google Scholar; Peet, op. cit.

92 Allen, Robert S., The Shame of the States (New York, 1949), p. viiGoogle Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.