Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-c4bhq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-09T10:27:05.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Bruce Bueno de Mesquita ,
Randolph M. Siverson  and
Gary Woller
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita
Affiliation:
Hoover Institution and University of Rochester
Randolph M. Siverson
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Gary Woller
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Governments are likely to be held accountable for the success or failure of their foreign policies. Consequently, we claim that international wars can, under specified conditions, have domestically instigated consequences for violent regime change in the political systems of the participants. Drawing upon all international war participation between 1816 and 1975, we seek to answer the question, Do wars lead to violent changes of regime and if so, under what conditions? Three hypotheses set out the expected associations of a nation's initiator or target role in a war, the war outcome, and the costs of the war with domestically instigated violent changes of regime. Direct relationships are found for all three and hold even against possible threats to their validity and robustness. The results suggest that domestic politics play a larger role in national security policy than is generally believed by realist or neorealist theorists.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 638 - 646
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Banks, Arthur S. 1971. Cross-Polity Time-Series Data. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Bienen, Henry, and van de Walle, Nicholas. 1991. Of Time and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNardo, James. 1985. Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facts on File. 1966–1975 New York: Facts on File, Inc.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack. 1980. “Theories of Revolution: The Third Generation.” World Politics 32:425–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W. 1991. “On the Political Capacity of Nation States: Institutionalization and Legitimacy.” In On Measuring Democracy, ed. Inkeles, Alex. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lamborn, Alan. 1991. The Price of Power: Risk and Foreign Policy in Britain, France, and Germany. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Langer, William L. 1952. Encyclopedia of World History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1973. Politics among Nations. 5th ed. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James. 1987. “On the Theoretical Basis of a Measure of National Risk Attitudes.” International Studies Quarterly 31:423–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organski, A. F. K., and Kugler, Jacek. 1980. The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasler, Karen, and Thompson, William. 1989. War and State Making: The Shaping of the Global Powers. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1957. “Events and Situations.” Journal of Philosophy 55:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1990. “Economic Decline, Electoral Pressure, and the Initiation of Interstate Conflict.” In Prisoners of War?, ed. Gochman, Charles and Sabrosky, Alan Ned. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M. 1980. “War and Change in the International System.” In Change in the International System, ed. Holsti, Ole R., Siverson, Randolph M., and George, Alexander. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Small, Melvin, and Singer, J. David. 1982. Resort to Arms. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1957. Social and Cultural Dynamics. Rev. and abr. ed. Boston: Porter.Google Scholar
Spuler, Bertold. 1977. Rulers and Governments of the World. London: Bowker.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 1991. “The Relationship between Revolution and War: A Theoretical Overview.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur, and Russett, Bruce. 1980. “Evaluating War: Outcomes and Consequences.” In Handbook of Political Conflict, ed. Gurr, Ted Robert. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stohl, Michael. 1980. “The Nexus of Civil and International Conflict.” In Handbook of Political Conflict, ed. Gurr, Ted Robert. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European State-Making.” In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Tilly, Charles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, A.D. 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, and Zinnes, Dina. 1973. “A Linkage Model of International Conflict Behavior.” In Conflict Behavior and Linkage Politics, ed. Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1979. “How a War Ends: A Rational Model Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 23:743–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond, and Rosenstone, Stephen. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.