Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:21:30.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trickle-Up Political Socialization: The Causal Effect on Turnout of Parenting a Newly Enfranchised Voter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2018

JENS OLAV DAHLGAARD*
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
*
Jens Olav Dahlgaard is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School, Steen Blichers Vej 22, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark ([email protected]).

Abstract

Scholars have argued that children affect their parents’ political behavior, including turnout, through so-called trickle-up socialization. However, there is only limited causal evidence for this claim. Using a regression discontinuity design on a rich dataset, with validated turnout from subsets of Danish municipalities in four elections, I causally identify the effect of parenting a recently enfranchised voter. I consistently find that parents are more likely to vote when their child enters the electorate. On average across all four elections, I estimate that parents become 2.8 percentage points more likely to vote. In a context where the average turnout rate for parents is around 75%, this is a considerable effect. The effect is driven by parents whose children still live with them while there is no discernible effect for parents whose child has left home. The results are robust to a range of alternative specifications and placebo tests.

Type
Letter
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research has primarily been funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research (Grant No. 12-124983). The project has also received funding from the Danish Youth Council, The Ministry of Children, Equality, Integration, and Social Affairs, and the Danish Parliament. I am grateful to Klaus Levinsen, Bolette Danckert, Jonas Hedegaard Hansen, Yosef Bhatti, Kasper Møller Hansen, Christian Rostbøll, Peter Thisted Dinesen, Martin Vinæs Larsen, Søren Serritzlew, Signe Hald Andersen, Lindsay Dolan, Jacob Gerner Hariri, David Dreyer Lassen, three anonymous reviewers, and discussants and panel participants in the 2015 yearly meeting of Midwestern Political Science Association, the 2015 yearly meeting of European Political Science Association, and the 2016 Youth Political Participation Conference at McGill for thoughts and comments on previous versions of this paper. A special thanks is dedicated to Alex Coppock and Don Green, both of whom have provided help beyond any reasonable expectation. All remaining errors are my responsibility. I was a PhD candidate at the Department of Political Science at the University of Copenhagen when the manuscript was conceived and gratefully acknowledge the general support during this time. All replication data and code is available for replication except when explicitly exempted. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KWPEKK.

References

REFERENCES

Bergh, Johannes. 2013. “Does Voting Rights Affect the Political Maturity of 16- and 17-year-olds? Findings from the 2011 Norwegian Voting-Age Trial.” Electoral Studies 32 (1): 90100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, Yosef, Dahlgaard, Jens Olav, Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard, Hansen, Kasper Møller, and Olsen, Mariann Malchau. 2016. “Fra Valgstedet til Indkøbscenteret: Danskernes Stigende Brug af Brevstemmer.” Politik 19 (2): 95–115.Google Scholar
Bhatti, Yosef, Hansen, Kasper M., and Wass, Hanna. 2016. “First-Time Boost Beats Experience: The Effect of Past Eligibility on Turnout.” Electoral Studies 41: 151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calonico, Sebastian, Cattaneo, Matias D., Farrell, Max H., and Titiunik, Rocıo. 2017. “rdrobust: Software for Regression Discontinuity Designs.” The Stata Journal 17 (2): 372404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, Matias D., Frandsen, Brigham R., and Titiunik, Rocio. 2015. “Randomization Inference in the Regression Discontinuity Design: An Application to Party Advantages in the U.S. Senate.” Journal of Causal Inference 3 (1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, Matias D., Titiunik, Rocio, and Vazquez-Bare, Gonzalo. 2017. “Comparing Inference Approaches for RD Designs: A Reexamination of the Effect of Head Start on Child Mortality.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 36 (3): 643–81.Google Scholar
Cho, Wendy K. Tam, and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2008. “Emanating Political Participation: Untangling the Spatial Structure Behind Participation.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (02): 273–89.Google Scholar
Coppock, Alexander, and Green, Donald P.. 2016. “Is Voting Habit Forming? New Evidence from Experiments and Regression Discontinuities.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 1044–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinas, Elias. 2014. “Does Choice Bring Loyalty? Electoral Participation and the Development of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 449–65.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Wass, Hanna, and Valaste, Maria. 2016. “Political Socialization and Voting: The Parent–Child Link in Turnout.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Adam N., and Sen, Maya. 2015. “Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 3754.Google Scholar
Hahn, Jinyong, Todd, Petra, and Van der Klaauw, Wilbert. 2001. “Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Econometrica 69 (1): 201–9.Google Scholar
Holbein, John B., and Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2016. “Making Young Voters: The Impact of Preregistration on Youth Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (2): 364–82.Google Scholar
Hyman, Herbert. 1959. Political Socialization. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido W., and Lemieux, Thomas. 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 615–35.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.” The American Political Science Review 62 (1): 169–84.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura, and Bowers, Jake. 2009. “Politics Across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” The Journal of Politics 71 (03): 782–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Erik Gahner, Levinsen, Klaus, and Kjaer, Ulrik. 2016. “Democracy for the Youth? The Impact of Mock Elections on Voting Age Attitudes.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26 (4): 435–51.Google Scholar
Lee, David S., and Card, David. 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Inference with Specification Error.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 655–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David S., and Lemieuxa, Thomas. 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (2): 281355.Google Scholar
Linimon, Amy, and Joslyn, Mark R.. 2002. “Trickle Up Political Socialization: The Impact of Kids Voting USA on Voter Turnout in Kansas.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (1): 2436.Google Scholar
McDevitt, Michael, and Chaffee, Steven. 2000. “Closing Gaps in Political Communication and Knowledge Effects of a School Intervention.” Communication Research 27 (3): 259–92.Google Scholar
McDevitt, Michael, and Chaffee, Steven. 2002. “From Top-Down to Trickle-Up Influence: Revisiting Assumptions about the Family in Political Socialization.” Political Communication 19 (3): 281301.Google Scholar
McDevitt, Michael, and Kiousis, Spiro. 2006. “Experiments in Political Socialization: Kids Voting USA as a Model for Civic Education Reform.” The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, Working Paper 49: 12.Google Scholar
Meredith, Marc. 2009. “Persistence in Political Participation.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4 (3): 187209.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, Skovron, Christopher, and Titiunik, Rocío. 2017. “Differential Registration Bias in Voter File Data: A Sensitivity Analysis Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 744–60.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 2002. “Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 4156.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1999. “Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults’ Political Predispositions.” The Journal of Politics 61 (01): 128.Google Scholar
Simon, James, and Merrill, Bruce D.. 1998. “Political Socialization in the Classroom Revisited: The Kids Voting Program.” The Social Science Journal 35 (1): 2942.Google Scholar
Tedin, Kent L. 1974. “The Influence of Parents on the Political Attitudes of Adolescents.” American Political Science Review 68 (04): 1579–92.Google Scholar
Urbatsch, Robert. 2014. Families’ Values: How Parents, Siblings, and Children Affect Political Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Washington, Ebonya L. 2008. “Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers’ Voting on Women’s Issues.” The American Economic Review 98 (1): 311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Janelle, and Tseng, Vivian. 2008. “Political Socialisation in Immigrant Families: Challenging Top-Down Parental Socialisation Models.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (1): 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeglovits, Eva, and Zandonella, Martina. 2013. “Political Interest of Adolescents Before and After Lowering the Voting Age: The Case of Austria.” Journal of Youth Studies 16 (8): 1084–104.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Dahlgaard Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Dahlgaard supplementary material

Dahlgaard supplementary material 1

Download Dahlgaard supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.1 MB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.