Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T10:57:48.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas Hobbes: Skeptical Moralist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1995

Dana Chabot
Dana Chabot*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thomas Hobbes is usually held to have been a skeptic in matters of religion and morality. I accept the claim that there is a distinctive skeptical strain in Hobbes' thought but argue that his skepticism informs his moral vision, rather than depriving him of a conception of morality. As evidence for this reading, I situate Hobbes in a tradition of “skeptical moralism,” along with Montaigne and certain other Renaissance figures. As opposed to moral skeptics, skeptical moralists think of moral agents as divided selves, pulled in one direction by law and another by conscience. Skeptical moralists use skepticism to make people aware of this tension, and I argue that (especially in his remarks on religion) Hobbes was doing just that.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 401 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan. 1985. The Modes of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1983. The Sceptical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. 1983. Institutes of the Christian Religion. 2 vols. Trans. Beveridge, Henry. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre. 1697. Of Wisdom. 2 vols. Trans. Stanhope, G.. London: Gillyflower.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 1990. “Hobbes's Subject as Citizen.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Dietz, Mary. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewin, R. E. 1991. Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Farr, James. 1990. “Atomes of Scripture.” Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Dietz, Mary. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas Google Scholar
Farr, James. 1988. “Political Science and the Enlightenment of Enthusiasm.” American Political Science Review 82:51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, Donald. 1965. Montaigne: A Biography. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1990. Behemoth. Ed. Tonnies, F.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1978. Man and Citizen. Ed. Gert, B.. Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1840. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes. 11 vols. Ed. SirMolesworth, William. London: Bohn.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1968. Leviathan. Ed. MacPherson, C. B.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1975. Hume's Enquiries. Ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, David. 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan. Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Martinich, Aloysius. 1992. The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Samuel. 1969. The Hunting of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. 1987. An Apology for Raymond Sebond. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. 1957. The Complete Essays. Ed. Frame, D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1959. “Hobbes's Concept of Obligation.” Philosophical Review 68:68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, John. 1971. “Time, History, and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes.” In Politics, Language, and Time. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1988. “A More Tolerant Hobbes?” In Justifying Toleration, ed. Mendus, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1983. “Hobbes, Toleration, and the Inner Life.” In The Nature of Political Theory, ed. Miller, D. and Seidentop, L.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Shelton, George. 1992. Morality and Sovereignty in the Philosophy of Hobbes. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1989. Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1990. “Hobbes and Locke on Toleration.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Dietz, Mary.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, John. 1989. Hobbes's System of ideas. London: Gower.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1960. Politics and Vision. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.