Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:01:41.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Substitution of Rule for Discretion in Public Law1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Ernst Freund
Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Extract

The course of recent legislation for the regulation of commerce, trade and industry has created the impression that there exists a tendency in our law to transfer powers of determination from the courts which act according to fixed principles to administrative commissions or officials vested with large discretionary powers.

Considering that normally the progress of law should be away from discretion toward definite rule, such a tendency should receive the most careful examination. The first inquiry should however be whether and to what extent the impression is substantiated by facts.

The advent of the new administrative power is in the public mind associated chiefly with public utility and industrial commissions first created for the control of railroads, for the earlier powers over banks and insurance companies, as well as those of medical and other licensing boards, attracted relatively little attention or comment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1915

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This paper was read at a meeting of the Legal-Philosophical Conference in Chicago, in April, 1914.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.