Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T13:09:48.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Social and Political Dimensions of Nuclear Power: Examples from Three Mile Island

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Dorothy Nelkin
Dorothy Nelkin*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public concerns about the social and political implications of energy choices have found expression in the nuclear debate. The Three Mile Island accident, in its complexity and far-reaching consequences, served to focus criticism of nuclear power that had been building up for a decade. It revealed with striking clarity that technology is a social concept to be understood in terms of social and political relationships if it is to be brought under public control. The ramifications of the accident revealed the conceptual difficulties of assessing social risks and the political difficulties in managing them. This article draws examples from the Three Mile Island accident to review several characteristics of nuclear technology, its scale and costs, its complexity, its uncertain and unpredictable physical effects, and its indirect risks. It then explores the implications for social, political and administrative institutions as they grope for ways to manage the risks of nuclear power in the context of critical public scrutiny. Finally it identifies a range of issues calling for policy research.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 132 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chisolm, Rupert (1980). “Reaction of TMI Workers.” Presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on the Three Mile Island Accident, New York.Google Scholar
DiMento, Joseph (1977). “Citizen Environmental Litigation and Administrative Process.” Duke Law Journal 22: 409–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohrenwend, Bruce, et al. (1980). “Stress in the Community.” Presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on the Three Mile Island Accident, New York.Google Scholar
Fischoff, B., et al. (1979). “Issues in Hazard Management: Acceptable Risk.” Environment 21: 14–24.Google Scholar
Flynn, Cynthia B. (1980). “Three Mile Island Survey.” Report for Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.: USGPO, October 1975, NUREG/CR 1093.Google Scholar
Flynn, Cynthia B. (1980). “Local Public Opinion.” Presented at New York Academy of Sciences Conference on the Three Mile Island Accident, New York.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office (1980). Report to the Congress on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, D.C., USGPO, January 15, 1980.Google Scholar
Hebert, N. J. (1980). “TMI Still Stymies Nuclear Industry.” Bufalo Courier Press, March 23, 1980.Google Scholar
Henderson, Oran (1980). “Emergency Preparedness and Response—The Three Mile Island Incident.” Presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on the Three Mile Island Accident, New York.Google Scholar
Horwitch, Mel (1979). “Designing and Managing Large Scale Public-Private Technological Enterprises: A State of the Art Review.” Technology in Society 1: 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, Roger, et al. (1979). “Institutional Response to Three Mile Island.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 35: 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemeny, John (1979). Quoted in Washington Post, May 8, 1979.Google Scholar
Kemeny, John (1980). “Saving American Democracy: The Lessons of Three Mile Island.” Technology Review 82: 67–75.Google Scholar
Kneier, Andrew (1976). Serving Two Masters. Washington, D.C., Investigative Study of Common Cause.Google Scholar
LaPorte, Todd (1980). “Design and Management of Nearly Error Free Safety Control Systems.” In Sills, David et al. (eds.), Social Science Aspects of the Accident at Three Mile Island. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lifton, Robert (1976). “Nuclear Energy and the Wisdom of the Body.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 23: 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, Robert (1979). Broken Connection. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Logan, Rebecca, and Nelkin, Dorothy (1980). “Labor and Nuclear Power.” Environment 22: 6–13.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times, March 30, 1979.Google Scholar
Marshall, Eliot (1980). “NRC Takes a Second Look at Reactor Design.” Science 207: 1445–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEachron, B., and Tiege, P. (1977). “Constraints on Large Scale Technological Projects.” Research Report #CSS 4676-14. Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Robert (1980). “The Public Response to Three Mile Island.” Presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on the Three Mile Island Accident, New York.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Defense Council (1980). “Potential Consequences of Nuclear Reactor Accidents: An Information Bulletin.” New York City Energy Project, April 7, 1980. Washington, D.C.: NRDC.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy (1975). “The Political Impact of Technical Expertise.” Social Studies of Science 5: 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy (1980). “The Expert at Three Mile Island.” In Sills, David et al. (eds.), Social Science Aspectss of the Accident at Three Mile Island. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy, and Pollak, Michael (1980). The Arom Besieged: Extra-Parliamentary Dissent in France and Germany. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noble, David (1977). America by Design. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1979). Public Hearings on Three Mile Island. March 30-April 3. (Excerpted in “Excerpts from Nuclear Mishap Talks,” New York Times, April 14, 1979, p. A9.)Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles (1980). “TMI: A Normal Accident.” In Sills, David et al. (eds.), Social Science Aspects of the Accident at Three Mile Island. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island [Kemeny Commission] (1979). Report. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Norman (1974). “Evaluation of the Risks of the Accident in Commercial Nuclear Reactors.” WASH 1400, NUREG-75/014, Washington. D.C. Google Scholar
Reid, Mayor Robert (1980). Quoted in Franklin, B. A., “Researchers Finding Anxiety in the Air Near Three Mile Island.” New York Times, March 27, 1980, p. A20.Google Scholar
Rogovin, Mitchell (1979). “Report on Three Mile Island.” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rubin, David, et al. (1979). “Report of the Public's Right to Information.” (Task Force for Kemeny Commission), Washington, D.C.: October 1979 (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Shields, Mark, et al. (1979). “Socioeconomic Impacts of Nuclear Power Plants.” Oak Ridge Laboratory, NUREG-CR o916 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Sills, David (1980). “The Utilization of Social Science Knowledge in Studying Technology and Society.” Presented at conference on Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge, Vienna. Available in mimeograph at Social Science Research Council, New York.Google Scholar
Stanfield, C. G. (1976). “Technology and Organization Structure as Theoretical Categories.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 489–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Chauncey (1980). “Post TMI Nuclear Utilities' Initiatives.” Presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on the Three Mile Island Accident, New York.Google Scholar
Technical Assessment Task Force (1979). “Recovery: TMI-Clean Up and Decontamination.” Report to Kemeny Commission, Washington, D.C. (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Thornburgh, Richard (1979). Statement in transcript of August 21, 1979 Hearing of The President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island, Kemeny, John G. Chairman. Washington, D.C., Bowers Reporting Co. Google Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists (1977). The Risks of Nuclear Power Reactors: A Review of WASH 1400. Cambridge, Mass.: UCS.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Alvin (1980). “Three Mile Island in Perspective.” Presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on the Three Mile Island Accident, New York.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon (1980). “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109: 121–36.Google Scholar
Wolf, C. P. (1979). “The Accident at Three Mile Island: Social Science Perspectives.” Items 33: 56–61.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.