Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Cameron, Charles M.
Cover, Albert D.
and
Segal, Jeffrey A.
1990.
Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 2,
p.
525.
Miller, Mark C.
1992.
Congressional Committees and the Federal Courts: a Neo-Institutional Perspective.
Western Political Quarterly,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
949.
Overby, L. Marvin
Henschen, Beth M.
Walsh, Michael H.
and
Strauss, Julie
1992.
Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 86,
Issue. 4,
p.
997.
Ruckman,, P. S.
1993.
The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
793.
Miller, Mark C.
1993.
Courts, Agencies, and Congressional Committees: A Neo-Institutional Perspective.
The Review of Politics,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
471.
Comiskey, Michael
1993.
Can the Senate Examine the Constitutional Philosophies of Supreme Court Nominees?.
PS: Political Science & Politics,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
495.
Miller, Mark C.
1993.
Lawyers in Congress:What Difference Does It Make?.
Congress & the Presidency,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Hammond, Thomas H.
and
Hill, Jeffrey S.
1993.
Deference or Preference?.
Journal of Theoretical Politics,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
23.
Comiskey, Michael
1993.
Can the Senate Examine the Constitutional Philosophies of Supreme Court Nominees?.
PS: Political Science & Politics,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 03,
p.
495.
Overby, L. Marvin
1994.
The Senate and Justice Thomas: A Note on Ideology, Race, and Constituent Pressures.
Congress & the Presidency,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
131.
Overby, L. Marvin
Henschen, Beth M.
Strauss, Julie
and
Walsh, Michael H.
1994.
African-American Constituents and Supreme Court Nominees: An Examination of the Senate Confirmation of Thurgood Marshall.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 4,
p.
839.
Comiskey, Michael
1994.
The Usefulness of Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judicial Nominees: The Case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
PS: Political Science & Politics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
224.
Comiskey, Michael
1994.
The Usefulness of Senate Confirmation Hearings for Judicial Nominees: The Case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
PS: Political Science & Politics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
224.
Guliuzza, Frank
Reagan, Daniel J.
and
Barrett, David M.
1994.
The Senate Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court Nominees: Measuring the Dynamics of Confirmation Criteria.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
773.
Spriggs, James F
and
Wahlbeck, Paul J.
1995.
Calling It Quits: Strategic Retirement on the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1893-1991.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 3,
p.
573.
Gimpel, James G.
and
Ringel, Lewis S.
1995.
Understanding court nominee evaluation and approval: Mass opinion in the Bork and Thomas cases.
Political Behavior,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
135.
King, James D.
1996.
Senate confirmation of cabinet nominations: Institutional politics and nominee qualifications.
The Social Science Journal,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 3,
p.
273.
Ainsworth, Scott H.
and
Maltese, John Anthony
1996.
National Grange Influence on the Supreme Court Confirmation of Stanley Matthews.
Social Science History,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Epstein, David
and
O'Halloran, Sharyn
1996.
Divided Government and the Design of Administrative Procedures: A Formal Model and Empirical Test.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
373.
Maschke, Karen J.
and
Siggelakis, Susan J.
1996.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: SENATORS‘ OPENING STATEMENTS AT SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATON HEARINGS.
Southeastern Political Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
77.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.