Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-09T05:10:38.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics, Markets, and the Organization of Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

John E. Chubb  and
Terry M. Moe
John E. Chubb
Affiliation:
The Brookings Institution
Terry M. Moe
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We offer a comparative analysis of public and private schools, presenting data from a new national study—the Administrator and Teacher Survey—that expands on the pathbreaking High School and Beyond survey. We find that public and private schools are distinctively different in environment and organization. Most importantly, private schools are more likely to possess the characteristics widely believed to produce effectiveness. We argue throughout that the differences across the sectors are anchored in the logic of politics and markets. This argument derives from our belief that environmental context has pervasive consequences for the organization and operation of all schools and specifically that the key differences between public and private environments—and thus between public and private schools—derive from their characteristic methods of social control: the public schools are subordinates in a hierarchic system of democratic politics, whereas private schools are largely autonomous actors “controlled” by the market.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 1065 - 1087
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramowitz, Susan, and Stackhouse, E. A.. 1980. The Private High School Today. National Institute of Education, Washington.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A. 1950. “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, Arthur, and Greenfield, William. 1980. The Effective Principal: Perspectives on School Leadership. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Boyer, Ernest. 1983. High School: A Report on American Secondary Education. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Brookover, Wilbur B., Beady, Charles, Flood, Patricia, Schweitzer, John, and Wisenbaker, Joe. 1979. School Social Systems and Student Achievement: Schools Can Make a Difference. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bryk, Anthony S. 1981. “Disciplined Inquiry or Policy Argument?” Harvard Educational Review 51: 497–509.Google Scholar
Campbell, Roald I., et al. 1985. The Organization and Control of American Schools. 5th ed.Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. 1986. A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the Twenty-first Century. Washington: Carnegie Forum.Google Scholar
Cibulka, James G., O'Brien, Timothy J., and Zewe, Donald. 1982. Inner City Private Elementary Schools. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S., and Hoffer, Thomas. 1987. Public and Private High Schools. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S., Hoffer, Thomas, and Kilgore, Sally. 1982. High School Achievement. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Doyle, Denis P. and Hartle, Terry W.. 1985. Excellence in Education: The States Take Charge. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Erickson, Donald A. 1982. “Disturbing Evidence About the ‘One Best System.’” In The Public School Monopoly, ed. Everhart, Robert B.. San Francisco: Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Goldberger, Arthur S., and Cain, Glen G.. 1982. “The Causal Analysis of Cognitive Outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore Report.” Sociology of Education 55: 103–22.Google Scholar
Goodlad, John I. 1984. A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew M. 1966. The Education of Catholic Americans. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew M. 1977. “Who Controls Catholic Education?” Education and Urban Society 9: 146–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, William J. 1979. Union Rule in the Schools. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Guthrie, James W., and Zusman, Ami. 1981. “Unasked Questions.” Harvard Educational Review 51: 515–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyns, Barbara, and Hilton, Thomas H.. 1982. “The Cognitive Tests for High School and Beyond: An Assessment.” Sociology of Education 55: 89–102.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit. Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, Laurence. 1967. Politics in Education. New York: Center for Applied Research in Education.Google Scholar
Knott, Jack H., and Miller, Gary J.. 1987. Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of Institutional Choice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kraushaar, Otto F. 1972. American Nonpublic Schools: Patterns of Diversity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Paul R., and Lorsch, Jay W.. 1967. Organization and Environment. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
Masters, Nicholas A., Salisbury, Robert, and Eliot, Thomas H.. 1964. State Politics and the Public Schools. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1984. “The New Economics of Organization.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 739–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murnane, Richard J. 1981. “Evidence, Analysis, and Unanswered Questions.” Harvard Educational Review 51: 483–89.Google Scholar
National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk. Washington: NCEE.Google Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. 1976. School Politics, Chicago Style. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. 1985. The Politics of School Reform: 1870–1940. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peshkin, Alan. 1986. God's Choice: The Total World of the Christian School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Salancik, Gerald R.. 1979. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Powell, Arthur G., Farrar, Eleanor, and Cohen, David K.. 1985. The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1983. “Beyond Tiebout: Modeling the Political Economy of Local Government.” In Local Provision of Public Services: The Tiebout Model after Twenty-five Years, ed. Zodrow, George R.. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Rutter, Michael, Maughan, B., Mortimer, P., Ouston, J., and Smith, A.. 1979. Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, James W. 1981. The Education of an Urban Minority: Catholics in Chicago, 1822–1965. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard, and Meyer, John W.. 1984. “Environmental Linkages and Organizational Complexity.” Stanford University Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance Project Report No. 84-A16.Google Scholar
Sizer, Theodore R. 1984. Horace's Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Tyack, David. 1974. The One Best System. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. 1976. “Educational Organizations As Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wirt, Frederick and Kirst, Michael. 1982. Schools in Conflict. Berkeley: McCutchan.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.