Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:30:44.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Science and the Enlightenment of Enthusiasm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

James Farr
James Farr
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I provide a narrative of the emergence of an expressly articulated “political science” in the Scottish Enlightenment. Political science was designed by Hume, Smith, and others to advance both a Newtonian method for the study of politics and a politics of moderation whose tasks included a critique of enthusiasm. In this way, political science, moderation, and (anti)enthusiasm were conceptually connected. The emergence of political science, understood in this way, required a number of conceptual changes in a structure of argument shaped largely by Locke. These conceptual changes, in turn, fixed a rhetorical framework for persistent debates over the methodological and political identity of political science, even as ideology literally replaced enthusiasm. These persistent debates reveal the relevance of the history of political science as a forum for remembrance, reflection, and critique.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 51 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, Douglass. 1957. “That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science”: David Hume, James Madison and the Tenth Federalist. Huntington Library Quarterly 20:343–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcraft, Richard. 1986. Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Terence. 1983. The Ontological Presuppositions and Political Consequences of a Social Science. In Changing Social Science, ed. Sabia, Daniel R. and Wallulis, Jerald T.. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles. 1927. Time, Technology, and the Creative Spirit in Political Science. American Political Science Review 21:1·11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles. 1983. Experience and Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John. 1983. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, Bernard. 1959. The American Science of Politics: Its Origins and Conditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. 1983. From Applied Theology to Social Analysis: The Break between John Locke and the Scottish Enlightenment. In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of the Discipline. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Euben, Peter. 1970. Political Science and Political Silence. In Power and Community: Dissenting Essays in Political Science, ed. Green, Phillip and Levinson, Sanford. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Farr, James. 1978. Hume, Henneneutics, and History: A “Sympathetic” Account. History and Theory 17:285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, James. 1982. Humean Explanations in the Moral Sciences. Inquiry 25:57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, James. 1987. The Way of Hypotheses: Locke on Method. Journal of the History of Ideas 48: 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. 1767. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Edinburgh: A. Millar and T. Caddel.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. 1792. Principles of Moral and Political Science. 2 vols. Edinburgh: W. Creech.Google Scholar
Flew, Anthony. 1985. Thinking about Social Thinking. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Forbes, Duncan. 1975. Hume's Philosophical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, Duncan. 1977. Hume's Science of Politics. In David Hume: Bicentenary Papers, ed. Morice, G. P.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gay, Peter. 1966. The Enlightenment, An Interpretation: The Rise of Modern Paganism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark. 1983. John Locke and Anglican Royalism. Political Studies 31:61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, Mark. 1988. Ideology. In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, ed. Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonsen, Knud. 1981. The Science of a Legislator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: New American Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harpham, Edward J. 1984. Liberalism, Civic Humanism, and the Case of Adam Smith. American Political Science Review 78:764–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1968 (orig. pub. 1651). Leviathan. Ed. Macpherson, Crawford B.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan, and Ignatieff, Michael, eds. 1983. Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1748. Essays, Moral and Political. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1754. The History of England. 6 vols. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1975 (orig. pub. 1748, 1751, 1777). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. 3d ed Ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1978 (orig. pub. 1739). A Treatise of Human Nature. 2d ed. Ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1755. A System of Moral Philosophy. Glasgow: Foulis.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Margaret. 1976. The Newtonians and the English Revolution, 1669–1720. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Norman. 1963. Political Science and Political Education. American Political Science Review 57:561–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammen, Michael, ed. 1986. The Origin of the American Constitution: A Documentary History. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kettler, David. 1965. The Social and Political Thought of Adam Ferguson. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Kettler, David. 1977. History and Theory in Ferguson's Essay on the History of Civil Society: A Reconsideration. Political Theory 5:437–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1982. Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knox, Ronald A. 1950. Enthusiasm: A Chapter in the History of Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Leary, David. 1980. The Intentions and Heritage of Descartes and Locke: Toward a Recognition of the Moral Basis of Modern Psychology. Journal of General Psychology 102:283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iichtheim, George. 1967. The Concept of Ideology. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Livingston, David W. 1984. Hume's Philosophy of Common Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975 (orig. pub. 1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1976–1985. The Correspondence. 8 vols. Ed. de Beer, Esmond S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, David S. 1985. Religious Enthusiasm in the New World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1971. Against the Self-images of the Age. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1963 (orig. pub. 1852). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. 1970. The German Ideology. Ed. Arthur, Christopher J.. New York: International.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles E. 1931. New Aspects of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1924. Autobiography. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1963. Collected Works. Vol. 13. Ed. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Moore, James. 1977. Hume's Political Science and Classical Republican Tradition. Canadian Journal of Political Science 10:809–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, David Fate. 1982. David Hume: Common Sense Moralist, Skeptical Metaphysician. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, John G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, John G. A. 1985. Virtue, Commerce, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, David M. 1984. The Tragedy of Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1977. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, William. 1777. The History of America. 2 vols. Dublin: Whitestone.Google Scholar
Robertson, William. 1844 (orig. pub. 1759). The History of Scotland. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Sabia, Daniel R. 1984. Political Education and the History of Political Thought. American Political Science Review 78:985–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Hillel. 1978. Knaves, Fools, Madmen, and That Subtile Effluvium, Gainesville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Seidelman, Raymond, and Harpham, Edward J.. 1985. Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884–1984. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, third earl of. 1727. Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. 4th ed. 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. 1979. A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. and Wilson, Thomas, eds. 1975. Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978. Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1969 (orig. pub. 1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Ed. West, Edwin G.. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976 (orig. pub. 1776). The Wealth of Nations. 2 vols. Ed. Carman, Edwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1980. Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Ed. Wightman, William P. D.. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Stewart, Dugald. 1854. Collected Works. 10 vols. Ed. SirHamilton, William. Edinburgh: Thomas Constable.Google Scholar
Storing, Herbert J., ed. 1962. Essays in the Scientific Study of Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Storing, Herbert J., ed. 1981. The Complete Anti-Federalist. 7 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Susie I. 1972. Enthusiasm: A Study in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wahlke, John C. 1979. Pre-Behavioralism in Political Science. American Political Science Review 73:9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, Frederick G. 1985. Order and Artifice in Hume's Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wills, Garry. 1981. Explaining America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith's Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic: 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. 1970. Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.