Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:09:50.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Parties, World Demand, and Unemployment: Domestic and International Sources of Economic Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1985

James E. Alt
James E. Alt*
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article replicates and extends earlier work on the politics of macroeconomic policy by considering political effects on unemployment in 14 western industrial nations between 1960 and 1983. Changes of party control of government display broadly the expected effects, namely that unemployment falls under left-wing governments and rises under right-wing governments. However, the principal conclusions of this article are that partisan effects on unemployment in open economies (that is, economies heavily dependent on trade with other countries) can only be satisfactorily estimated relative to the constraint imposed by the level of world economic activity, and that in addition to politicians' strategic incentives, political institutions and economic regime constraints also determine whether partisan effects on unemployment will be sustained, transitory, or absent. With respect to the latter, on the whole no effects are found where no such effects were promised by the new government before taking office; where one-party or dominant-partner coalitions form, the effect on unemployment is transitory, whereas where broad coalitions form, it is sustained or absent. Finally, ceteris paribus, any partisan effects are more likely where governments secure parliamentary majorities.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 1016 - 1040
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahtola, J., & Tiao, G. Parameter inferences for a nearly nonstationary first order autoregressive model. Statistics Research Center, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, Technical Report No. 5, 1983.Google Scholar
Alt, J. Party strategies, world demand, and unemployment in Britain and the United States, 1947-83. Political Behavior, 1985, 7, 7–36.10.1007/BF00987260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, J., & Chrystal, K. A. Political economics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. Unemployment benefits and incentives. In Creedy, J. (Ed.). The economics of unemployment in Britain. London: Butterworths, 1981.Google Scholar
Beck, N. Parties, administrations, and American macroeconomic outcomes. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 83–93.10.2307/1960444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N. Domestic politics and monetary policy: A comparative perspective. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 1983.Google Scholar
Berglund, S., & Lindstrom, U. The Scandinavian party system(s). Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1978.Google Scholar
Blondei, J. Party systems and patterns of government in western democracies. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1968, 1, 180–203.10.1017/S0008423900036507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borooah, V., & van der Ploeg, F. Political aspects of the economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Box, G., & Jenkins, C. Time series analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1976.Google Scholar
Box, G., & Tiao, G. Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1975, 70, 70–79.10.1080/01621459.1975.10480264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, R. International crises: A rallying point for the president. Public Opinion, 1984, 6/6, 41-43, 60.Google Scholar
Budge, I., & Farlie, D. Explaining and predicting elections. London: Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 1978, 72, 1243–1261.10.2307/1954537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, F. The impact of parties. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982.Google Scholar
Chappell, H., & Keech, W. Party differences in macro-economic policies and outcomes. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, Phoenix, 1984.Google Scholar
Cox, O., McCubbins, M. & Sullivan, T. Policy choice as an electoral investment. Social Choice and Welfare, 1984, 1, 231–242.10.1007/BF00433518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, M., & Lothian, J. British economic policy under Margaret Thatcher: A midterm examination. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1983, 18, 157–208. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dodd, L. Coalitions in parliamentary governments. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Dow, J. The management of the British economy 1945-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Fair, R. Estimated output, price, interest rate, and exchange rate linkages among countries. Journal of Political Economy, 1982, 90, 507–535.10.1086/261072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. Granger causality and time series analysis of political relationships. American Journal of Political Science, 1983, 27, 327–358.10.2307/2111021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. Modern political economy. London: Martin Robertson, 1978.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 1977, 71, 1467–1487.10.2307/1961490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, D. Communication. American Political Science Review, 1983, 77, 447–451.10.1017/S0003055400271542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keech, W. Of honeymoons and economic performance: Comment on Hibbs. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 280–281.10.1017/S0003055400186988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, J. Trends and problems in postwar public expenditure development in western Europe and North America. In Flora, P. & Heidenneimer, A. (Eds.). The development of welfare states in Europe and America. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. The politics of accommodation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.10.1525/9780520317680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, B. The political business cycle: An empirical test. Southern Economic Journal, 1978 44, 504–515.10.2307/1057206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCleary, R., & Hay, R. Applied time series analysis for the social sciences. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
Nelson, C, & Schwert, G. Tests for predictive relationships between time series variables: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1982, 77, 11–17.10.1080/01621459.1982.10477761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickeli, S. The determinants of equilibrium unemployment in Britain. Economic Journal, 1982, 92, 555–575.10.2307/2232550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niekeli, S., & Andrews, M. Unions, real wages, and employment in Britain 1951-1979. Oxford Economic Papers, 1983, 35 (Supplement), 507–530.Google Scholar
Novotny, E. Nationalized industries as an instrument of stabilization policy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economy, 1983, 53, 41–57.Google Scholar
Olson, M. The rise and decline of nations. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Paldam, M. Is there an electional cycle? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1979, 81, 323–342.Google Scholar
Ralston, M., & Jennrich, R. DUD: A derivative-free algorithm for non-linear least squares. Techno-metrics, 1978, 20, 7–14.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. A theory of party competition. London: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. Inflation, unemployment, and government collapse: A Poisson application. Comparative Political Studies, 1983, 15, 425–444.10.1177/0010414083015004003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. Do parties make a difference? Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House, 1980.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. The welfare state and the economy in periods of economic crisis. European Journal of Political Research, 1983, 11, 1–26.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. Interest intermediation and regime gov-ernability in contemporary western Europe and North America. In Berger, S. (Ed.). Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism and the transformation of politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Schwerin, D. Norwegian and Danish incomes policies and European monetary integration. West European Politics, 1980, 3, 388–405.10.1080/01402388008424293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.