Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:22:49.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patricide and the Plot of The Prince: Cesare Borgia and Machiavelli's Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

John T. Scott  and
Vickie B. Sullivan
John T. Scott
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Vickie B. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Skidmore College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An understanding of Machiavelli's assessment of Cesare Borgia in The Prince is essential for interpreting his view of politics, but the ambiguity of that assessment has led to vastly different conclusions about Machiavelli's political teaching and Cesare's significance. We approach Machiavelli's ultimate intentions through a consideration of his more immediate concern for Italy. Machiavelli's great interest in Cesare and his criticism of this potential hero stem from the historical context of an Italy divided due to the Church. Cesare possessed—yet squandered—an opportunity to rid Italy of the evils plaguing it by killing his father, Pope Alexander, and by eliminating the College of Cardinals. Machiavelli's suggested denouement to the plot of The Prince is an assault on the ecclesiastical power. He invites his reader to contemplate the vulnerability of the Church and to act where Cesare and others shrank. Machiavelli ultimately counsels us to break our reliance on God or fortune and thus create the conditions for a reinvigorated civil life.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 887 - 900
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, John William. [1928] 1960. A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century. Reprint. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Baron, Hans. 1954. “The Concept of Nationalism in Machiavelli's Prince.” Studies in the Renaissance 1:38–48.Google Scholar
Baron, Hans, 1991. “The Principe and the Puzzle of the Date of Chapter 26.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 21:83–102.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1980. “The Originality of Machiavelli.” In Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, ed. Hardy, Henry. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Jacob. 1958. The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. Trans. Middlemore, S. G. C.. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. 1962. The Statecraft of Machiavelli. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Catholic Encyclopedia. 1913. 15 vols. New York: Encyclopedia Press.Google Scholar
Chabod, Federico. 1964. “Il segretario fiorentino.” In Scritti su Machiavelli, 4th ed.Torino: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Eric. 1961. “Machiavelli: 1940–1960.” Journal of Modem History 33:113–36.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto. 1945. Etica e Politica. 3d ed.Bari: G. Laterza e Figli.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary G. 1986. “Trapping the Prince: Machiavelli and the Politics of Deception.” American Political Science Review 80:777–99.Google Scholar
Figgis, John Neville. [1907] 1960. Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius, 1414–1625. Reprint. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Frederick of Prussia. 1981. The Refutation of Machiavelli's “Prince”; or, Anti-Machiavel. Trans. Sonnino, Paul. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Geerken, John H. 1976. “Machiavelli Studies since 1969.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37:351–68.Google Scholar
Gentillet, Innocent. 1968. Anti-Machiavel. Ed. Edward Rathé, T.. Genève: Libraire Droz.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto von. [1900] 1987. Political Theories of the Middle Age. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Allan H. 1938. Machiavelli's “Prince” and Its Forerunners. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Felix. 1977. History: Choice and Commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grazia, Sebastian de. 1989. Machiavelli in Hell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco. 1969. The History of Italy. Trans. Alexander, Sidney. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco. 1970. The History of Florence. Trans. Domandi, Mario. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark. 1983. Citizen Machiavelli. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, John. 1987. “Machiavelli's Paradox: Trapping or Teaching the Prince.” American Political Science Review 81:1277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1971. Tutte le opere. Florence: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1985. The Prince. Trans. Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1988. Florentine Histories. Trans. Banfield, Laura F. and Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr., Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1989. The Chief Works and Others. Trans. Gilbert, Allan, 3 vols. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Lionel A. 1982. “Rousseau's Debate with Machiavelli in the Social Contract.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43:209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr., 1981. “Machiavelli's Political Science.” American Political Science Review 75:293–305.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Garrett. 1958. “Machiavelli's Prince: Political Science or Political Satire?” American Scholar 27:482–91.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles Louis Secondat, Baron de, . 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. and trans. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia Carolyn, and Stone, Harold Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1978. “Machiavelli's Unchristian Charity.” American Political Science Review 72:1217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parel, Anthony J. 1992. The Machiavellian Cosmos. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Petrarch, Francesco. 1976. Petrarch's Lyric Poems: The Rime Sparse and Other Lyrics. Ed. and trans. Durling, Robert M.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1984. Fortune Is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . N.d. The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Trans. Dryden, John and Clough, Arthur Hugh. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1978. On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy. Ed. Masters, Roger D.. Trans. Masters, Judith R.. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Nicolai. 1990. “Machiavelli and Florentine Republican Experience.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sasso, Gennaro. 1966. Machiavelli e Cesare Borgia: Storia di un giudizio. Rome: Ateneo.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1981. Machiavelli. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1990. “Machiavelli's Discorsi and the Pre-humanist Origins of Republican Ideas.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1958. Thoughts on Machiavelli. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. 1982. “Quentin Skinner's Method and Machiavelli's Prince.” Ethics 92:692–709.Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. 1990. “Machiavelli and the Republican Idea of Politics.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitfield, John Humphreys. [1947] 1965. Machiavelli. Reprint. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Whitfield, John Humphreys. 1969. Discourses on Machiavelli. Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1960. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.