Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:15:13.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Kenneth M. Roberts  and
Erik Wibbels
Kenneth M. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Erik Wibbels
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three different theoretical explanations are tested for the exceptionally high level of electoral volatility found in contemporary Latin America: economic voting, institutional characteristics of political regimes and party systems, and the structure and organization of class cleavages. A pooled cross-sectional time-series regression analysis is conducted on 58 congressional elections and 43 presidential elections in 16 Latin American countries during the 1980s and 1990s. Institutional variables have the most consistent effect on volatility, while the influence of economic performance is heavily contingent upon the type of election and whether the dependent variable is operationalized as incumbent vote change or aggregate electoral volatility. The results demonstrate that electoral volatility is a function of short-term economic perturbations, the institutional fragilities of both democratic regimes and party systems, and relatively fluid cleavage structures.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 575 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anuario Estadístico de la República Argentina. 1995. Volume 11. Buenos Aires: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1995. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boletín Electoral Latinoamericano. Various issues. San José, Costa Rica: Centro de Asesoría y Promotión Electoral and Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, ed. 1996. The New Economic Model in Latin America and Its Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A. 1994. Democracy and Authoritarianism in Peru: Political Coalitions and Social Change. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Coggins, John, and Lewis, D.S., eds. 1992. Political Parties of the Americas and the Caribbean. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M. 1995. “Politicians against Parties: Discord and Disconnection in Ecuador's Party System.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 434–58.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1995. “Freezing in the Tropics: Explaining Party-System Volatility in Latin America.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1997a. “District Magnitude, Economic Performance, and Party-System Fragmentation in Five Latin American Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 30 (April): 156–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1997b. “Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Working Paper Series, Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1998. “The Evolution of Latin American Party Systems.” In Politics, Society, and Democracy: Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Valenzuela, Arturo. Boulder, CO: Westview Pp. 171–206.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, and Denver, David, eds. 1985. Electoral Change in Western Democracies: Patterns and Sources of Electoral Volatility. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Daalder, Hans, and Mair, Peter. 1983. Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1996. “Political Cleavages, Issues, and Electoral Change.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. LeDuc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G., and Norris, Pippa. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 319–42.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C., and Beck, Paul Allen, eds. 1984. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin, eds. 1989. Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1989. “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 22 (October): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1992. “Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 24 (January): 488–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian. 1995. Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Europa World Year Book. Various issues. London: Europa.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1982. “Economic Self-Interest and Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (August):446–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., Mackie, Thomas T., and Valen, Henryet al. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, Laver, Michael, and Mair, Peter. 1995. Representative Government in Modern Europe. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1996. Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1997. “The Populist Road to Market Reform: Policy and Electoral Coalitions in Mexico and Argentina.” World Politics 49 (April): 339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1998. “Democracy and Political Representation in Latin America in the 1990's: Pause, Reorganization, or Decline?” In Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America, ed. Aguero, Felipe and Stark, Jeffrey. Miami, FL: University of Miami North-South Center Press. Pp. 99–143.Google Scholar
Huber, P.J. 1967. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-Standard Conditions.” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1: 221–33.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank. Various issues. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization. 1996. Informa América Latina y el Caribe: Panorama Laboral '96. Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
Kay, Bruce H. 1996. “Fujipopulism and the Liberal State in Peru, 1990–1995.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 38 (Winter): 55–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgements in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (August):495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The Transformation of Western European Party Systems.” In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65 (March): 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review 77 (March): 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “The Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (April): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, ed. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein. New York: Free Press. Pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Maguire, Maria. 1983. “Is There Still Persistence? Electoral Change in Western Europe, 1948–1979.” In Western European Part Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 67–94.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R., eds. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (February): 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez, Gustavo, and Pagés, Carmen. 1998. “Ties that Bind: Employment Protection and Labor Market Outcomes in Latin America.” Working Paper Series 373. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism without Perón: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria. 1997. “Union Politics, Market-Oriented Reforms, and the Reshaping of Argentine Corporatism.” In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, ed. Chalmers, Douglas A.et al.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter, ed. 1993. Enciclopedia Electoral Latinoamericana y del Caribe. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (January): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacek, Alexander C. 1994. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (August): 723–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens. 1983. “Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems, 1948–1977.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, ed. Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 29–66.Google Scholar
Perelli, Carina, Sonia, Picado S., and Zovatto, Daniel, ed. 1995. Partidos y Clase Política en América Latina en los 90. San José, Costa Rica: IIDH-CAPEL.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox. 1991. Labor Parties in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, Alessandro. 1981. “Interests and Parties in Pluralism.” In Organizing Interests in Western Europe, ed. Berger, Suzanne D.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 247–84.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M., Burnham, Walter Dean, Corrado, Anthony, Hershey, Marjorie Randon, Just, Marion R., Keeter, Scott, McWilliams, Wilson Carey, and Mayer, William G. 1997. The Election of 1996: Reports and Interpretations. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Pp. 247–84.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham, and Whitten, Guy D. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (May): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presidential Elections since 1789. 1987. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1991a. “New Wine or Old Bottlenecks? The Study of Latin American Democracy.” Comparative Politics 23 (July): 479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1991b. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review 85 (September): 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1992–1993. “The Process of Democratization in Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 27 (Winter): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1995. “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case.” World Politics 48 (October): 82–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1996. “Economic Crisis and the Demise of the Legal Left in Peru,” Comparative Politics 29 (October): 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M., and Arce, Moises. 1998. “Neoliberalism and Lower Class Political Behavior in Peru.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (April): 217–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, Guillermo. 1994. “The Informal Sector and Poverty in Latin America.” CEPAL Review 52 (April): 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scully, Timothy R. 1992. Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter, and Valenzuela, Arturo. 1996. “Electoral Engineering and Democratic Stability: The Legacy of Authoritarian Rule in Chile.” In Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America, ed. Lijphart, Arend and Waisman, Carlos H.Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
Stimson, James. 1985. “Regression in Time and Space: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichman, Judith. 1996. “Economic Restructuring, State-Labor Relations, and the Transformation of Mexican Corporatism.” In Neoliberalism Revisited: Economic Restructuring and Mexico's Political Future, ed. Otero, Gerardo. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 149–66.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. Various issues. Foreign Labor Trends. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996a. “Neoliberalism and Neopopulism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (Fall): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996b. “Risk Taking in Latin American Economic Restructuring: Lessons from Prospect Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (June): 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “A Paradox of Success? Determinants of Political Support for President Fujimori.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
White, Halbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48 (May): 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.