Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:53:48.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizing Groups for Collective Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1986

Robyn M. Dawes ,
John M. Orbell ,
Randy T. Simmons  and
Alphons J. C. Van De Kragt
Robyn M. Dawes
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
John M. Orbell
Affiliation:
University of Oregon and Utah State University
Randy T. Simmons
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Alphons J. C. Van De Kragt
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How can the beneficiaries of collective action be persuaded to contribute the resources (time, energy, money) necessary for the effort to succeed? Rational and selfish players will recognize they can free ride on the successful contributions of others. If the effort is not successful, they will lose a contribution—and be “suckered.” Other than relying on altruism, organizers of the group effort can modify incentives so that players are more prepared to contribute. Laboratory experiments offer one way of assessing the effectiveness of various such modifications; we conducted such tests to see how well contributing is promoted by (1) assuring contributors that they will not lose if the group effort fails (a “money-back guarantee”) and (2) enforcing contributions if it succeeds (“fair share”). We expect the latter to be more successful because it is “stable,” unlike the former, whose success can be undermined by expectations of that success. Three experimental replications demonstrate that the money-back guarantee is no more successful than a standard dilemma, but fair-share requirements increase contributing significantly over that base. Analysis of subjects' expectations about others' behavior offers some support to the hypothesized process undermining the money-back guarantee, but motivational factors must also be taken into account for a full explanation.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 80 , Issue 4 , December 1986 , pp. 1171 - 1185
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, Robert, and Hamilton, William D.. 1981. The Evolution of Cooperation. Science, 211: 1390–96.10.1126/science.7466396CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brubaker, Earl R. 1975. Free Ride, Free Revelation or Golden Rule? The Journal of Law and Economics, 18:147–61.10.1086/466808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Michael D. 1976. Communication and Sex Effects in a Five-Person Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33:273–80.10.1037/0022-3514.33.3.273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, Clyde. 1973. A Reparameterization of the Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Behavioral Science, 18:424–28.10.1002/bs.3830180605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1980. Social Dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31:169–93.10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M., McTavish, Jeannie, and Shaklee, Hariett. 1977. Behavior, Communication and Assumptions about Other Peoples' Behavior in a Commons Dilemma Situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35:1–11.10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edney, Julian, and Harper, Christopher S.. 1978. The Commons Dilemma: A Review. Environmental Management, 2:419–507.10.1007/BF01866708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, Norman, and Oppenheimer, Joe. 1970. I Get by With a Little Help From My Friends. World Politics, 23:104–20.10.2307/2009633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Leo A. 1964. Simple Methods for Analyzing Three-Factor Interactions in Contingency Tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59:319–52.10.1080/01621459.1964.10482163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerdee, Thomas H., and Rosen, Benson. 1974. Effects of Opportunity to Communicate and Visibility of Individual Decisions on Behavior in the Common Interest. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59:712–16.10.1037/h0037450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orbell, John M., Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Simmons, Randy T.. 1984. Do Cooperators Exit More Readily than Defectors? American Political Science Review, 78:147–62.10.2307/1961254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. Participation and the Provision of Discrete Public Goods: A Strategic Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 24:171–93.10.1016/0047-2727(84)90023-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Amnon. 1985. Provision of Public Goods and the MCS Experimental Paradigm. American Political Science Review, 79:148–55.10.2307/1956124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1974. The Prisoner's Dilemma: Recollections and Observations. In Rapoport, Anatol, ed., Came Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co. 10.1007/978-94-010-2161-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffé, Henry A. 1960. The Analysis of Variance. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Simmons, Randy T. 1980. The Logic for Cooperation? An Investigation of the Free Rider Hypothesis. Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, The University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976. The Wealth of Nations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1776).Google Scholar
SPSSX. 1983. SPSSX Users' Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
van de Kragt, , Alphons, J. C., Orbell, John M., and Dawes, Robyn M.. 1983. The Minimal Contributing Set as a Solution to Public Goods Problems. American Political Science Review, 77:112–22.10.2307/1956014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Kragt, , Alphons, J. C., Orbell, John M., and Dawes, Robyn M.. 1985. Reply to Calvert and Wilson. American Political Science Review, 79: 823–24.10.1017/S0003055400228517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Kragt, , Alphons, J. C., Orbell, John M., and Dawes, Robyn M., with Braver, Sandy R. and Wilson, L. A. II. 1986. Doing Well and Doing Good as Solutions to Public Goods Problems. In Wilke, Henke, Messick, David, and Rutte, Crystel, eds., Experimental Social Dilemmas. Frankfurt am Main: Lang GmbH.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.