Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:45:26.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass Dynamics of U.S. Presidential Competitions, 1928–1936

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Courtney Brown
Courtney Brown*
Affiliation:
Emory University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This analysis investigates the mass dynamics of competitive electoral politics with respect to the presidential vote during the 1928–36 realigning period for the United States. A formal system of three interdependent differential equations is employed to characterize the dynamic processes of the aggregate voter shifts between the Republican, Democratic, and nonvoter populations. The modeling strategy is used to locate substantial variations in the mass dynamics between large subgroups in the electorate as well as to identify both national and socially interactive components to the patterns of voter movements. The results show that the overall realignment period was quite complex. Vote switching from the Republican party to the Democratic party was the dominant characteristic of the 1932 election, whereas additional Democratic gains in 1936 came mostly from new voters.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 1153 - 1181
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Kristi. 1979a. The Creation of a Democratic Majority 1928–1936. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Kristi. 1979b. “Generation, Partisan Shift, and Realignment: A Glance Back to the New Deal.” In The Changing American Voter, ed. Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bard, Yonathan. 1974. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles J. 1986. “A Dynamic Model of Partisan Competition in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 822–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen. 1974. “Environment and Party: The Impact of Political and Demographic County Characteristics on Party Behavior.” American Political Science Review 68: 1229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blum, Terry C. 1985. Structural Constraints on Interpersonal Relations: A Test of Blau's Macrosociological Theory. American Journal of Sociology 91:511–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Courtney. 1987. “Voter Mobilization and Party Competition in a Volatile Electorate.” American Sociological Review 52: 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 1986. “Presidential Coattails and Midterm Losses in State Legislative Elections.” American Political Science Review 80: 45–63.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M. 1978. “Party Coalitions in the Early Twentieth Century.” In Emerging Coalitions in American Politics, ed. Lipset, Seymour Martin. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1964. Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1981. Longitudinal Data Analysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1975. “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In The Handbook of Political Science, ed. Greenstein, Fred A. and Polsby, Nelson. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Danby, J. M. A. 1985. Computing Applications to Differential Equations: Modelling in the Physical and Social Sciences. Reston, VA: Reston.Google Scholar
Degler, Carl N. 1971. “American Political Parties and the Rise of the City.” In Electoral Change and Stability in American Political History, ed. Clubb, Jerome M. and Allen, Howard. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dennis, John E., Gay, D. M., and Welsh, R. E.. 1981a. “An Adaptive Nonlinear Least Squares Algorithm.” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 7: 348–68.Google Scholar
Dennis, John E., Gay, D. M., and Welsh, R. E.. 1981b. “Algorithm 573-NL2SOL—An Adaptive Nonlinear Least Squares Algorithm.” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 7: 369–83.Google Scholar
Dennis, John E., and Schnabel, Robert B.. 1983. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Tedin, Kent L.. 1981. ‘The 1928–36 Partisan Realignment: The Case for the Conversion Hypothesis.” American Political Science Review 75:951–62.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. 1965. “Function Minimization without Evaluating Derivatives—A Review, Computer Journal 8:33–41.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John V., Zinnes, Dina A., Schrodt, Philip A., Tahim, G. S., and Michael Rubinson, R.. 1977. “An Optimal Control Model of Arms Races.” American Political Science Review 71: 226–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosnell, Harold F. 1927. Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haberman, Richard. 1977. Mathematical Models: Mechanical Vibrations, Population Dynamics. and Traffic Flow. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hamming, Richard W. 1971. Introduction to Applied Numerical Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hamming, Richard W. 1973. Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. 2d ed.New York-McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Jackson, John E.. 1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Morris W., and Smale, Stephen. 1974. Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1983. “The Social Context of Political Change: Durability, Volatility, and Social Influence.” American Political Science Review 77: 929–44.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R.Robert, C. W. Kohfeld, and Likens, Thomas W.. 1982. Dynamic Modeling: An Introduction. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert, and Sprague, John. 1987. “Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.” American Political Science Review 81: 1197–1216.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert, and Sprague, John. 1988. “Choice, Social Structure, and Political Information: The Informational Coersion of Minorities.” American Journal of Political Science. 32: 467–82.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Laura, and Lichtman, Allan J.. 1976. “Across the Great Divide: Inferring Individual Level Behavior from Aggregate Data.” Political Methodology 3: 411–39.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1987. “Variable Coefficient Models and Analysis of Electoral Change.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Judge, George G., Hill, R. Carter, Griffiths, William, Lutkepohl, Helmut, and Lee, Tsoung-chau. 1982. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Key, Valdimir O. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.Google Scholar
Key, Valdimir O. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Croups. 5th ed.New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Kocak, Huseyin. 1986. Differential and Difference Equations through Computer Experiments. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review 77: 92–111.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carl, and Hadley, Charles D.. 1978. Transformations of the American Party System: Political Coalitions from the New Deal to the 1970s. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lubell, Samuel. 1965. The Future of American Politics. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Luenberger, David G. 1979. Introduction to Dynamic Systems: Theory, Models, and Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, and Courtney Brown. 1987. Political Context and Attitude Change. American Political Science Review 81:42–56.Google Scholar
McPhee, William N. 1963. Formal Theories of Mass Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McPhee, William N., and Ferguson, Jack. 1962. “Political Immunization.” In Public Opinion and Congressional Elections, ed. McPhee, William N. and Glaser, William A.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
May, Robert M. 1974. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1979. The Changing American Voter. 2d ed.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Katz, Richard S., and Newman, David. 1980. “Reconstructing Past Partisanship: The Failure of the Party Identification Recall Questions.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 633–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. M., and Gurney, W. S. C.. 1982. Modelling Fluctuating Populations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Parent, T. Wayne, Jillson, Calvin C., and Weber, Ronald E.. 1987. “Voting Outcomes in the 1984 Democratic Party Primaries and Caucuses.” American Political Science Review 81: 67–84.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1981. Party Coalitions: Realignments and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 80: 17–43.Google Scholar
Powell, M. J. D. 1964. “An Efficient Method for Finding the Minimum of a Function of Several Variables without Calculating Derivatives.” Computer Journal 7: 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1975. “Institutionalization of Voting Patterns or, Is Mobilization the Source of Decay?” American Political Science Review 69: 49–67.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Soares, Glaucio A. D.. 1971. “Theories in Search of a Curve: A Contextual Interpretation of Left Vote.” American Political Science Review 65: 51–65.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1963. “Mathematical Models of Social Interaction.” In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 2, ed. Luce, Robert Duncan, Bush, Robert R., and Galanter, Eugene. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1983. Mathematical Models in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Reiter, Howard L. 1980. “The Perils of Partisan Recall.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 385–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Robert. 1970. Stability Theory and Its Application. Vol. 1 of Dynamical System Theory in Biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1984. SAS/ETS Users Guide. Version 5. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shively, W. Philip. 1971–1972. “A Reinterpretation of the New Deal Realignment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 621–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1955. The Web of Croup Affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sprague, John. 1976. “Estimating a Boudon Type Contextual Model: Some Practical and Theoretical Problems of Measurement.” Political Methodology 3: 333–53.Google Scholar
Sprague, John. 1981. “One-Party Dominance in Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6: 259–85.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Tuma, Nancy Brandon, and Hanna, Michael T.. 1984. Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael Don. 1984. “Differential Paths to Parity: A Study of the Contemporary Arms Race.” American Political Science Review 78: 297–317.Google Scholar
White, William Allen. 1965. A Puritan in Babylon: The Story of Calvin Coolidge. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.