Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:33:35.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life-Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1995

Laura Stoker  and
M. Kent Jennings
Laura Stoker
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
M. Kent Jennings
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the consequences of changes in marital status for political participation, treating marital status as marking points of continuity and transition in an individual's life history and marriage as a setting that fosters interaction and interdependence between marital partners. The analysis is based on panel and pseudopanel data from the 1965–82 socialization study of parents, offspring, and spouses. We find that marital transitions affect participation in four ways: (1) marital partners adjust their activity levels to become more like each other after marriage; (2) marital transitions of any type, especially marriage among younger people, tend to depress participation; (3) the overall effect of marriage, however, is powerfully mediated by the participation level of the partner; and (4) these mediation effects are greatest for political activities that involve collective efforts or draw upon the couple's joint resources.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 421 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Paul Allen. 1991. “Voters Intermediation Environments in the 1988 Presidential Contest.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55:371–95.10.1086/269269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C.. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, Edith D. 1992. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone, and Face to Face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT Publikaties.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1986. Politics, Self, and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael, and Dantico, Marilyn K.. 1982. “Political Participation and Neighborhood Context Revisited.” American Journal of Political Science 26:144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1979. “Political Participation and Neighborhood Social Context.” American Journal of Political Science 23:579–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1986. Politics in Context. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1987. “Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.” American Political Science Review 81:1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Markus, Gregory B.. 1984. “Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 78:1000–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1971. “The Division of Political Labor between Mothers and Fathers.” American Political Science Review 65:69–92.10.2307/1955044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Stoker, Laura. 1992. “Intimate Social Contexts and Political Change: A Cross-Generational, Longitudinal Study.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kenny, Christopher B. 1992. “Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment.” American Journal of Political Science 36:259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Christopher B. 1993. “The Microenvironment of Political Participation.” American Politics Quarterly 21:223–38.10.1177/1532673X9302100204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, Paul William, and Finkel, Steven. 1987. “Is There a Marriage Gap in Politics?” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. 1990. “Social Interaction and Contextual Influences on Political Participation.” American Politics Quarterly 18:459–75.10.1177/1532673X9001800404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, and Brown, Courtney. 1987. “Political Context and Attitude Change.” American Political Science Review 81:471–90.10.2307/1961962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, Peter V. 1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review 52:122–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michigan University of Institute for Social Research. Survey Research Center. 1968. American National Election Study Codebook. ICPSR Study 7281. Ann Arbor: Michigan.Google Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W., and Goel, M. L.. 1977. Political Participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R., and Shaw, Daron. 1991. “Non-voting in America: Attitudes in Context.” In Political Participation and American Democracy, ed. Crotty, William. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Straits, Bruce C. 1990. “The Social Context of Voter Turnout.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54:64–73.10.1086/269184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straits, Bruce C. 1991. “Bringing Strong Ties Back In: Interpersonal Gateways to Political Information and Influence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55:432–88.10.1086/269272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy. 1987. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1982. “Interpersonal Networks and Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 26:117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.