Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:57:42.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberal Virtues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

William A. Galston
William A. Galston*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I explore possible links between liberalism and conceptions of individual virtue. I first distinguish between virtue seen as instrumental to the preservation of societies and institutions and virtue seen as intrinsically valuable, that is, as an end in itself. I argue that certain distinctive instrumental virtues are required for well-functioning liberal societies, economies, and political institutions. I then sketch different versions of liberal intrinsic virtue and explore the tensions among them and between them and liberal instrumental virtue. I conclude with some competing conjectures as to what extent necessary liberal virtues are being fostered through current institutions.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 1277 - 1290
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1984. The Potitics. Trans. Lord, Carnes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1976. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Budziszewski, J. 1986. The Resurrection of Nature: Political Theory and the Human Character. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Martin. 1959. “Democracy and The Federalist: A Reconsideration of the Framers' Intent.” American Political Science Review 53: 52–68.Google Scholar
Galston, William. 1982a. “Defending Liberalism.” American Political Science Review 76: 621–29.Google Scholar
Galston, William. 1982b. “Moral Personality and Liberal Theory: John Rawls's ‘Dewey Lectures.’” Political Theory 10: 492–519.Google Scholar
Galston, William. N.d. “Pluralism and Social Unity.” Ethics. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1962. Leviathan. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1963. Kant on History. Ed. Beck, Lewis White. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 1984. “Democratic Individuality and the Claims of Politics.” Political Theory 12: 331–60.Google Scholar
Kristol, Irving. 1980. “The Adversary Culture of Intellectuals.” In The Moral Basis of Democratic Capitalism, ed. Novak, Michael. Washington; American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1969. The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. “Is Patriotism a Virtue?” The Lindley Lectures. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Department of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Macpherson, Crawford B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Alpheus, ed. 1965. Free Government in the Making. 3d ed.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey Jr. 1987. “Constitutional Government: The Soul of Modern Democracy.” The Public Interest 86: 53–64.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1975. On Liberty. Ed. Spitz, David. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1980. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980.” Journal of Philosophy 77: 515–72.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1987. “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good.” Harvard University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy. 1987. Another Liberalism: Romanticism and the Reconstruction of Liberal Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1984. “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self.” Political Theory 12: 81–96.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1984. “The Idea of Negative Liberty.” In Philosophy in History, ed. Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spragens, Thomas Jr. 1986. “Reconstructing Liberal Theory: Reason and Liberal Culture.” In Liberals on Liberalism, ed. Damico, Alfonso. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. 1983. “A ‘Non-Lockean’ Locke and the Character of Liberalism.” In Liberalism Reconsidered, ed. MacLean, Douglas and Mills, Claudia. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. 1984. Locke's Education for Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1979. “Atomism.” In Essays in Honor of C. B. Macpherson, ed. Kontos, Alkis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Terchek, Ronald. 1986. “The Fruits of Success and the Crisis of Liberalism.” In Liberals on Liberalism, ed. Damico, Alfonso. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1985. “The Rediscovery of Character: Private Virtue and Public Policy.” The Public Interest 81: 3–16.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.