Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Graham, Barbara L.
2003.
Explaining Supreme Court Policymaking in Civil Rights: The Influence of the Solicitor General, 1953–2002.
Policy Studies Journal,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
253.
Baum, Lawrence
2003.
THESUPREMECOURT INAMERICANPOLITICS.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
161.
Kritzer, Herbert M.
and
Richards, Mark J.
2003.
Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking: The Lemon Regime and Establishment Clause Cases.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
827.
Gillman, Howard
2004.
MARTIN SHAPIRO AND THE MOVEMENT FROM “OLD” TO “NEW” INSTITUTIONALIST STUDIES IN PUBLIC LAW SCHOLARSHIP.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
363.
Western, Bruce
and
Kleykamp, Meredith
2004.
A Bayesian Change Point Model for Historical Time Series Analysis.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
354.
Navia, Patricio
and
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio
2005.
The Constitutional Adjudication Mosaic of Latin America.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 2,
p.
189.
Jacobi, Tonja
and
Tiller, Emerson H.
2005.
Legal Doctrine and Political Control.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Kritzer, Herbert M.
and
Richards, Mark J.
2005.
The Influence of Law in the Supreme Court’s Search-and-Seizure Jurisprudence.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
DAVIS, DONALD R.
2006.
A Realist View of Hindu Law.
Ratio Juris,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
287.
Friedman, Barry
2006.
Taking Law Seriously.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 02,
RICHARDS, MARK J.
SMITH, JOSEPH L.
and
KRITZER, HERBERT M.
2006.
Does Chevron Matter?.
Law & Policy,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 4,
p.
444.
Evans, Michael C.
McIntosh, Wayne V.
Lin, Jimmy
and
Cates, Cynthia L.
2006.
Recounting the Courts? Applying Automated Content Analysis to Enhance Empirical Legal Research.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Scott, Kevin M.
2006.
Reconsidering the Impact of Jurisprudential Regimes*.
Social Science Quarterly,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 2,
p.
380.
JOHNSON, TIMOTHY R.
WAHLBECK, PAUL J.
and
SPRIGGS, JAMES F.
2006.
The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 1,
p.
99.
Hönnige, Christoph
2006.
Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie.
p.
179.
Baldez, Lisa
Epstein, Lee
and
Martin, Andrew D.
2006.
Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment?.
The Journal of Legal Studies,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 1,
p.
243.
Lindquist, Stefanie A.
and
Klein, David E.
2006.
The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Study of Conflict Cases.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Way, Lori Beth
and
Turner, Charles C.
2006.
Disagreement on the Rehnquist Court.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3,
p.
293.
Wilson, Esq., Dr. Sean
2006.
The Attitudinal Model, Political Science, Ecological Fallacy and Exaggeration.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Hurwitz, Mark S.
2006.
Ideology and Deference in U.S. Courts of Appeals Decision Making on Administrative Law.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.