Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:47:30.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information Effects in Collective Preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Scott L. Althaus
Scott L. Althaus*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contrary to much of the literature on collective opinion, I find that the low levels and uneven social distribution of political knowledge in the mass public often cause opinion surveys to misrepresent the mix of voices in a society. To assess the bias introduced by information effects, I compare “fully informed” collective preferences simulated from actual survey data to collective preferences revealed in the original data. Analysis of policy questions from the 1988 and 1992 American National Election Studies shows that group differences in knowledge, along with the public's modest average level of political knowledge, can cause significant distortions in measures of collective opinion. The mass public may appear more progressive on some issues and more conservative on others than would be the case if all citizens were equally well informed. To the extent that opinion polls influence democratic politics, this suggests that information effects can impair the responsiveness of governments to their citizens.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 92 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 545 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, John, and Nelson, Forrest. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. 1995. “Can Collective Opinion Redeem an Ill-Informed Public?” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.Google Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. 1996a. “Opinion Polls, Information Effects and Political Equality: Exploring Ideological Biases in Collective Opinion.” Political Communication 13(January–March):3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. 1996b. “Who Speaks for the People? Political Knowledge, Representation, and the Use of Opinion Surveys in Democratic Politics.” Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey S.. 1996. “Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” American Political Science Review 90(March):34–45.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 1990. “Public Opinion and Political Interests.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(February):194–230.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen. 1988. “‘Know-Nothings’ Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today.” Social Science Quarterly 69(June):476–90.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1995. “Americans' Knowledge of Ideology, 1980–1992.” American Politics Quarterly 23(July):259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, George, Oldendick, Robert, and Tuchfarber, Alfred. 1983. “Effects of Filter Questions in Public Opinion Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47(Winter):528–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Nicolas Caritat de. [1785] 1972. Essai sur l'application de l'analyse a la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1972. “On ‘Interests’ in Politics.” Politics and Society 2(Summer):459–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David. New York: Free Press. Pp. 206–61.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1970. “Attitudes and Nonattitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, ed. Tufte, Edward. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 168–89.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1990. “Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information.” In Information and Democratic Processes, ed. Ferejohn, John and Kuklinski, James. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Pp. 369–88.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carpini, Delli, Michael, X., and Keeter, Scott. 1992. “An Analysis of Information Items on the 1990 and 1991 NES Surveys.” Report to the Board of Overseers for the National Election Studies.Google Scholar
Carpini, Delli, Michael, X., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37(November):1179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpini, Delli, Michael, X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dimock, Michael A., and Popkin, Samuel L.. 1995. “Knowledge, Trust, and International Attitudes.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Measuring Issue Preferences: The Problem of Response Instability.” In Political Analysis, ed. Stimson, John. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 25–60.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Kuklinski, James, eds. 1990. Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan F., Lau, Richard R., and Smith, Richard A.. 1990. “On the Varieties and Utilities of Political Expertise.” Social Cognition 8(1):31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Owen, Guillermo, eds. 1986. Information Pooling and Group Decision Making. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., and Milburn, Michael A.. 1990. “Psychological Determinants of Political Opinionation.” Social Cognition 8(1):49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladha, Krishna K. 1992. “The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36(May):617–34.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1955. The Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lockerbie, Brad. 1991. “The Influence of Levels of Information on the Use of Prospective Evaluations.” Political Behavior 13(September):223–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83(June):399–419.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89(June):309–26.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88(March):63–76.Google Scholar
Luskin, Robert. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31(November):856–99.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., and Pinney, Neil. 1990. “The Effects of General and Domain-Specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment.” Social Cognition 8(1):9–30.Google Scholar
Miller, Nicholas. 1986. “Information, Electorates, and Democracy: Some Extensions and Interpretations of the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” In Information Pooling and Group Decision Making, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Owen, Guillermo. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 173–92.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and the National Election Studies. 1991. American National Election Study, 1988: Pre- and Post-Election Survey [computer file] (Study #9196). Conducted by Center for Political Studies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Survey Research Center [producer], 1991. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1991.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Kinder, Donald R., Rosenstone, Steven J., and the National Election Studies. 1993. American National Election Study, 1992: Pre- and Post-Election Survey [enhanced with 1990 and 1991 data] [computer file] (Study #6067). Conducted by University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies, and Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1993.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1994. “Question Wording and Mass Policy Preferences: The Comparative Impact of Substantive Information and Peripheral Cues.” Political Communication 11(April–June):165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, W. Russell. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin, and Shapiro, Robert. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L., and Dimock, Michael A.. 1995. “Cognitive Engagement and Citizen World Views.” Presented at the annual meeting of the PEGS Conference on Citizen Competence and the Design of Democratic Institutions, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Public Broadcasting Corporation. 1996. “National Issues Convention Deliberative Poll Reveals Significant Change in Delegates' Views on Key Issues.” Press release by Public Broadcasting Corporation, January 25.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(May):472–96.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., and Cramer, Katherine J.. 1996. “Activation and Application of Political Party Stereotypes: The Role of Television.” Political Communication 13(April–June):195–212.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Yanarella, Ernest. 1986. “Public Information on Public Issues: A Multivariate Analysis.” Social Science Quarterly 67(June):402–10.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric, and Squire, Peverill. 1990. “The Effects of Prestige Names in Question Wording.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54(Spring):97–116.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul, Brody, Richard, and Tetlock, Philip. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James. 1975. “Belief Systems: Constraint, Complexity and the 1972 Election.” American Journal of Political Science 19(August):393–417.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1985. “Pre-Testing Information Items on the 1986 NES Pilot Survey.” Report to the National Election Study Board of Overseers.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.