Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:58:14.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information Dissemination, Competitive Pressure, and Politician Performance between Elections: A Field Experiment in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

GUY GROSSMAN  and
KRISTIN MICHELITCH
GUY GROSSMAN*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
KRISTIN MICHELITCH*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
*
Guy Grossman is an Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania, 208 S. 37th Street Room 217, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6215 ([email protected]).
Kristin Michelitch is an Assistant Professor, Vanderbilt University, Commons Center PMB 0505, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN 37203-5721 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Politicians shirk when their performance is obscure to constituents. We theorize that when politician performance information is disseminated early in the electoral term, politicians will subsequently improve their performance in anticipation of changes in citizens’ evaluative criteria and possible challenger entry in the next election. However, politicians may only respond in constituencies where opposition has previously mounted. We test these predictions in partnership with a Ugandan civil society organization in a multiyear field experiment conducted in 20 district governments between the 2011 and 2016 elections. While the organization published yearly job duty performance scorecards for all incumbents, it disseminated the scorecards to constituents for randomly selected politicians. These dissemination efforts induced politicians to improve performance across a range of measures, but only in competitive constituencies. Service delivery was unaffected. We conclude that, conditional on electoral pressure, transparency can improve politicians’ performance between elections but not outcomes outside of their control.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 112 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 280 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Areum Han, Ana Garcia Hernandez, Christine Goldrick, Lindsay Van Landeghem, Simon Robertson, Maximilian Seunik, and Austin Walker for invaluable research assistance. This project would not have been possible without our ACODE team partners, especially Godber Tumushabe, Arthur Bainomugisha, Eugene Ssemakula, Lillian Tamale, Phoebe Atakunda, Naomi Kabarungi, and Naomi Asimo. We are grateful to the Democratic Governance Facility and the Andrew Carnegie Foundation for its generous funding. This study benefited tremendously from presenting an early design memo at the EGAP-7 meeting at the University of British Columbia. We thank the following for detailed comments: Josh Clinton, Jonathan Hiskey, Dave Lewis, Pia Raffler, Alan Wiseman, and participants at the Yale Leitner Seminar, Princeton Comparative Politics Colloquia, NYU Abu Dhabi Speaker Seminar, Vanderbilt CSDI Seminar, Southern Political Science Association Africa Political Economy Workshop, University of Minnesota Comparative Politics Series, Washington University’s Workshop on Elite Accountability, Watson Institute’s Development and Governance Seminar, Colby College, University of Illinois, and the EGAP-17 meeting at Yale University.

References

REFERENCES

Adida, Claire, Gottlieb, Jessica, Kramon, Eric, and McClendon, Gwyneth. 2016. “Breaking the Clientelistic Voting Equilibrium: The Joint Importance of Salience and Coordination.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael L. 2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103 (484): 1481–95.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Scott. 2012. “Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, and Shotts, Kenneth W.. 2015. “Challengers and Electoral Accountability.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Beazer, Quintin H. 2015. “Political Centralization and Economic Performance: Evidence from Russia.” The Journal of Politics 77 (1): 128–45.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., and Howell, William G.. 2007. “Accountability and Local Elections: Rethinking Retrospective Voting.” Journal of Politics 69 (3): 844–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Burgess, Robin. 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1415–51.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, Persson, Torsten, and Sturm, Daniel M.. 2010. “Political Competition, Policy and Growth: Theory and Evidence from the US.” The Review of Economic Studies 77 (4): 1329–52.Google Scholar
Bidwell, Kelly, Casey, Katherine, and Glennerster, Rachel. 2017. “Debates: Voting and Expenditure Responses to Political Communication.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor C., and Hidalgo, F. Daniel. 2011. “Controlling the Airwaves: Incumbency Advantage and Community Radio in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (4): 869–85.Google Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Ethan. 2007. “Politics and the Suboptimal Provision of Counterterror.” International Organization 61 (01): 9–36.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Broockman, David E.. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 463–77.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin, Gelbach, Jonah B., and Miller, Douglas L.. 2008. “Bootstrap-based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (3): 414–27.Google Scholar
Carlson, Elizabeth. 2015. ”Ethnic Voting and Accountability in Africa: A Choice Experiment in Uganda.” World Politics 67 (2): 353–85.Google Scholar
Chong, Alberto, Ana, L., Karlan, Dean, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2015. “Does Corruption Information Inspire the Fight or Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Turnout, Choice, and Party Identification.” The Journal of Politics 77 (1): 55–71.Google Scholar
Chwe, Michael Suk-Young. 2013. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cleary, Matthew R. 2007. “Electoral Competition, Participation, and Government Responsiveness in Mexico.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 283–99.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Vicente, Pedro C.. 2012. “Violence, Bribery, and Fraud: the Political Economy of Elections in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Public Choice 153 (1–2): 117–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 478–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, Cesi, Keefer, Philip, and Labonne, Julien. 2017. “Incumbent Advantage, Voter Information and Vote Buying.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry Jay. 1994. “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5 (3): 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad, Grossman, Guy, Humphreys, Macartan, Hyde, Susan D., and McIntosh, Craig. 2018. Information and Political Accountability: A New Method for Cumulative Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability and Representation, eds. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C. and Manin, Bernard. Cambrige, MA: Cambrige University Press, 55–97.Google Scholar
Fox, Justin, and Shotts, Kenneth W.. 2009. “Delegates or Trustees? A Theory of Political Accountability.” The Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1225–37.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Min, Brian. 2013. “Distributive Politics around the World.” Annual Review of Political Science 16, 73–99.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., and Huber, Gregory. 2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., Huber, Gregory A., and Landa, Dimitri. 2007. “Challenger Entry and Voter Learning.” American Political Science Review 101 (2): 303–20.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Jessica. 2016. “Greater Expectations: A Field Experiment to Improve Accountability in Mali.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 143–57.Google Scholar
Green, Elliott D. 2010. “Patronage, District Creation, and Reform in Uganda.” Studies in Comparative International Development 45 (1): 83–103.Google Scholar
Grimmer, Justin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Guy, and Hanlon, W. Walker. 2014. “Do Better Monitoring Institutions Increase Leadership Quality in Community Organizations? Evidence from Uganda.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 669–86.Google Scholar
Grossman, Guy, and Lewis, Janet I.. 2014. “Administrative Unit Proliferation.” American Political Science Review 108 (1): 196–217.Google Scholar
Harding, Robin. 2015. “Attribution and Accountability: Voting for Roads in Ghana.” World Politics 67 (4): 656–89.Google Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2014. “Substituting the End for the Whole: Why Voters Respond Primarily to the Election-Year Economy.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (1): 31–47.Google Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16; 285–306.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2011. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 289–310.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., Hill, Seth J., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 720–41.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2012. “Policing Politicians: Citizen Empowerment and Political Accountability in Uganda.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven I.. 2007. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kling, Jeffrey R., Liebman, Jeffrey B., and Katz, Lawrence F.. 2007. Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects. Econometrica 75 (1): 83–119.Google Scholar
Kosack, Stephen, and Fung, Archon. 2014. “Does Transparency Improve Governance?” Annual Review of Political Science 17, 65–87.Google Scholar
Kramon, Eric. 2016. “Electoral Handouts as Information: Explaining Unmonitored Vote Buying.” World Politics 68 (3): 454– 98.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S., Posner, Daniel N., and Tsai, Lily L.. 2014. “Does Information Lead to More Active Citizenship? Evidence from an Education Intervention in Rural Kenya.” World Development 60: 69–83.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan. 2010. “What Accountability Pressures Do MPs in Africa Face and How Do They Respond? Evidence from Ghana.” Journal of Modern African Studies 48 (1): 117–42.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2013. “Mapping Accountability: Core Concept and Subtypes.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (2): 202–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelitch, Kristin, and Utych, Stephen. Forthcoming. “Electoral Cycle Fluctuations in Partisanship Salience: Global Evidence from 86 Countries.” Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Mwenda, Andrew M., and Tangri, Roger. 2005. “Patronage Politics, Donor Reforms, and Regime Consolidation in Uganda. African Affairs 104 (416): 449–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nsibambi, Apolo. 1998. Decentralization and Civil Society in Uganda: The Quest for Good Governance. Kampala, Uganda: Fountain Pub Limited.Google Scholar
Ochieng’ Opalo, Kennedy. 2012. “African Elections: Two Divergent Trends.” Journal of Democracy 23 (3): 80–93.Google Scholar
Prat, Andrea. 2005. “The Wrong Kind of Transparency.” American Economic Review 95 (2): 862–77.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2015. “Acquiring the Habit of Changing Governments through Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (1): 101–29.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raffler, Pia. 2017. “Eyes On, Hands Off: Political Oversight, Local Bureaucracy, and Public Service Provision.” Presented at the American Political Science Annual Conference. San Francisco, August 31–September 3, 2017Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P., Civettini, Andrew J. W., and Emmerson, Karen M.. 2010. “The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever ‘Get It”?” Political Psychology 31 (4): 563–93.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M., and Strömberg, David. 2010. “Press Coverage and Political Accountability.” Journal of Political Economy 118 (2): 355–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé-Ollé, Albert, and Viladecans-Marsal, Elisabet. 2012. “Lobbying, Political Competition, and Local Land Supply: Recent Evidence from Spain.” Journal of Public Economics 96 (1): 10–9.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2013. “Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangri, Roger, and Mwenda, Andrew. 2001. “Corruption and Cronyism in Uganda’s Privatization in the 1990s.” African Affairs 100 (398): 117–33.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2007. “Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 151–65.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2010. Museveni’s Uganda: Paradoxes of Power in a Hybrid Regime. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Tsai, Lily L. 2007. “Solidary Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in Rural China.” American Political Science Review 101 (2): 355–72.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weghorst, Keith. 2015. Losing the Battle, Winning the War: Legislative Candidacy in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2012. “What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt out of Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 568–83.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Grossman and Michelitch Dataset

Dataset

https://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AI3VM8
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Grossman and Michelitch supplementary material

Grossman and Michelitch supplementary material 1

Download Grossman and Michelitch supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 14.8 MB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.