Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:23:46.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Islamists to Muslim Democrats: The Case of Tunisia’s Ennahda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2020

SHARAN GREWAL*
Affiliation:
College of William & Mary
*
*Sharan Grewal, Assistant Professor, College of William & Mary, [email protected].

Abstract

What drives some Islamists to become “Muslim Democrats,” downplaying religion and accepting secular democracy? This article hypothesizes that one channel of ideological change is migration to secular democracies. Drawing on an ideal point analysis of parliamentary votes from the Tunisian Islamist movement Ennahda, I find that MPs who had lived in secular democracies held more liberal voting records than their counterparts who had lived only in Tunisia. In particular, they were more likely to defend freedom of conscience and to vote against enshrining Islamic law in the constitution. Interviews with several of these MPs demonstrate that they recognize a causal effect of their experiences abroad on their ideologies, and provide support for three distinct mechanisms by which this effect may have occurred: socialization, intergroup contact, and political learning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Interviews were conducted under Princeton IRB #6749. I thank Intissar Samarat, Hamza Mighri, and Safa Belghith for their exceptional research assistance. For helpful comments on earlier drafts, I thank editor Ken Benoit, three anonymous reviewers, Matthew Cebul, Nathan Gonzalez, Nathan Grubman, Kim Guiler, Amaney Jamal, Robert Kubinec, Mirjam Künkler, Ellen Lust, Tarek Masoud, Victoria McGroary, Quinn Mecham, Rory Truex, and audiences at Princeton, the American Political Science Association, the Midwest Political Science Association, and the Project on Middle East Political Science. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VWBTL5.

References

REFERENCES

Allport, Gordon. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Carol. 2010. “Does Soft Power Matter? A Comparative Analysis of Student Exchange Programs 1980–2006.” Foreign Policy Analysis 6: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batista, Catia, and Vicente, Pedro C.. 2011. “Do Migrants Improve Governance at Home? Evidence from a Voting Experiment.” The World Bank Economic Review 25 (1): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Chantal E., and Nugent, Elizabeth R.. 2015. “Defining Political Choices: Tunisia’s Second Democratic Elections from the Ground Up.” Brookings Institution Analysis Paper 38: 1–28.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2008. “Taming Extremist Parties: Lessons from Europe.” Journal of Democracy 19 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, Rajeev. 1998. Secularism and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boughzala, Mongi, and Hamdi, Mohamed Tlili. 2014. “Promoting Inclusive Growth in Arab Countries: Rural and Regional Development and Inequality in Tunisia.” Brookings Global Economy and Development, Working Paper No. 71.Google Scholar
Broockman, David, and Kalla, Joshua. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352 (6282): 220–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browers, Michelle L. 2009. Political Ideology in the Arab World: Accommodation and Transformation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nathan. 2012. When Victory Is Not an Option: Islamist Movements in Arab Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason, Masoud, Tarek, and Reynolds, Andrew. 2015. The Arab Spring: Pathways of Repression and Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Careja, Romana, and Emmenegger, Patrick. 2012. “Making Democratic Citizens: The Effects of Migration Experience on Political Attitudes in Central and Eastern Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (7): 875–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavatorta, Francesco, and Merone, Fabio. 2013. “Moderation through Exclusion? The Journey of the Tunisian Ennahda from Fundamentalist to Conservative Party.” Democratization 20 (5): 857–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvet, Lisa, Gubert, Flore, and Mesple-Somps, Sandrine. 2016. “Do migrants Adopt New Political Attitudes from Abroad? Evidence Using a Multi-Sited Exit-Poll Survey during the 2013 Malian Elections.” Comparative Migration Studies 4 (19): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvet, Lisa, and Mercier, Marion. 2014. “Do return Migrants transfer Political Norms to their Origin Country? Evidence from Mali.” Journal of Comparative Economics 42 (3): 630–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Janine A. 2006. “The Conditions of Islamist Moderation: Unpacking Cross-Ideological Cooperation in Jordan.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 38 (4): 539–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, Karam. 2017. “Anti-Western Feelings in the Arab World and the Role of Exposure to the West: Rethinking Connections through Public Opinion.” Territory, Politics, Governance: 1–20.Google Scholar
Docquier, Frederic, Lodigiani, Elisabetta, Rapoport, Hillel, and Schiff, Maurice. 2016. “Emigration and Democracy.” Journal of Development Economics 120: 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Lee.Google Scholar
El-Ghobashy, Mona. 2005. “The Metamorphosis of the Egyptian Muslim Brothers.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 37: 373–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filali-Ansary, Abdou. 2016. “Tunisia: Ennahda’s New Course.” Journal of Democracy 27 (4): 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine 27: 2865–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gift, Thomas, and Krcmaric, Daniel. 2017. “Who Democratizes? Western-educated Leaders and Regime Transitions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution. 61 (3): 671701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamid, Shadi. 2014. Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartshorn, Ian M., and Yadav, Stacey Philbrick. 2018. “(Re)Constituting Community: Takfir and Institutional Design in Tunisia and Yemen.” Terrorism and Political Violence. FirstView.Google Scholar
Huang, Haifeng. 2015. “International Knowledge and Domestic Evaluations in a Changing Society: The Case of China.” American Political Science Review 109 (3): 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Lo, James, and Olmsted, Jonathan. 2016. “Fast Estimation of Ideal Points with Massive Data.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 631–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N., and van Kersbergen, Kees. 2010. “Christian Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakaya, Suveyda, and Yildirim, A. Kadir. 2013. “Islamist Moderation in Perspective: Comparative Analysis of the Moderation of Islamist and Western Communist Parties.” Democratization 20 (7): 1322–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakoc, Ekrem, Kose, Talha, and Ozcan, Mesut. 2017. “Emigration and the Diffusion of Political Salafism: Religious Remittances and Support for Salafi Parties in Egypt during the Arab Spring.” Party Politics 23 (6): 731–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künkler, Mirjam, and Tezcur, Günes Murat. 2018. “Reconsidering Islamist Moderation: Why It Matters Whether Parties Are Mainstream or Niche Parties.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Kuru, Ahmet T. 2009. Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Monica L. 2014. “Convince, Coerce, or Compromise? Ennahda’s Approach to Tunisia’s Constitution.” Brookings Doha Center Analysis. Paper 10.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Rory. 2015. “Protecting the Sacred: Tunisia’s Islamist Movement Ennahdha and the Challenge of Free Speech.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 42 (4): 447–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung, and Conn, Katharine M.. 2018. “When Do the Advantaged See the Disadvantages of Others? A Quasi-Experimental Study of National Service.” American Political Science Review 112 (4): 721–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netterstrom, Kasper Ly. 2015. “The Islamists’ Compromise in Tunisia.” Journal of Democracy 26 (4): 110–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, Elizabeth. 2017. “The Political Psychology of Repression and Polarization in Authoritarian Regimes.” Ph.D. thesis. Princeton University.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Armendáriz, Clarisa, and Crow, David. 2010. “Do Migrants Remit Democracy? International Migration, Political Beliefs, and Behavior in Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (1): 119–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Tropp, Linda R.. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining The Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 505–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith, Lewis, Jeffrey, Lo, James, and Carroll, Royce. 2011. “Scaling Roll Call Votes with Wnominate in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 42 (14): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwedler, Jillian. 2006. Faith in Moderation: Islamist Parties in Jordan and Yemen. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwedler, Jillian. 2011. “Can Islamists Become Moderates? Rethinking the Inclusion-Moderation Hypothesis.” World Politics 63 (2): 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwedler, Jillian. 2013. “Islamists in Power? Inclusion, Moderation, and the Arab Uprisings.” Middle East Development Journal 5 (1): 1350006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonovitz, Gabor, Kezdi, Gabor, and Kardos, Peter. 2018. “Seeing the World Through the Other’s Eye: An Online Intervention Reducing Ethnic Prejudice.” American Political Science Review 112 (1): 186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilimbergo, Antonio. 2009. “Democracy and Foreign Education.” The American Economic Review 99 (1): 528–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2000. “Democracy, Religion, and the ‘Twin Tolerations’.” Journal of Democracy 11 (4): 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamimi, Azzam S. 2001. Rachid Ghannouchi: A Democrat within Islamism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepe, Sultan. 2012. “Moderation of Religious Parties: Electoral Constraints, Ideological Commitments, and the Democratic Capacities of Religious Parties in Israel and Turkey.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 467–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Carrie. 2004. “The Path to Moderation: Strategy and Learning in the Formation of Egypt’s Wasat Party.” Comparative Politics 36 (2): 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Anne. 2017. Political Islam in Tunisia: The History of Ennahda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Grewal supplementary material

Grewal supplementary material

Download Grewal supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 394.1 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Grewal Dataset

Link
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.