Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:32:42.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Abe Fortas to Zoë Baird: Why Some Presidential Nominations Fail in the Senate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Glen S. Krutz ,
Richard Fleisher  and
Jon R. Bond
Glen S. Krutz
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Richard Fleisher
Affiliation:
Fordham University
Jon R. Bond
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why, given a strong presumption of success, do some presidential nominations fail? Of 1,464 important nominations from 1965 to 1994, less than 5% failed. Ninety-four percent of failures were rejected or withdrawn before reaching the floor, suggesting that opponents are most effective during prefloor stages. We propose a theoretical framework based on the notion that policy entrepreneurs pursue their goals within the context of a presumption of success. Logit analysis tends to support the theory that entrepreneurs can alter the presumption of success and defeat a nomination if they (1) identify negative information about a nominee to provide a rationale for changing the presumption and (2) expand the conflict through committee hearings and the media. Presidential resources—high public approval and efforts to signal that the nomination is a high priority—increase the chances of confirmation. Contrary to previous research, divided government has no independent effect on the fate of nominations.

Type
Research Note
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 92 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 871 - 881
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R. 1980. “The Politics of Court Structure: The Addition of New Federal Judges, 1949–1978.” Law and Policy Quarterly 2(April):181–8.10.1111/j.1467-9930.1980.tb00210.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard. 1984. “Presidential Popularity and Congressional Voting: A Reexamination of Public Opinion as a Source of Influence in Congress.” Western Political Quarterly 37(June):291–306.10.1177/106591298403700207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bosso, Christopher J. 1987. Pesticides and Politics: The Life Cycle of a Public Issue. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hinckley, Barbara. 1992. Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidents. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., Hojnacki, Marie, and Wright, John R.. 1996. “The Information Roles of Organized Interests in the Politics of Federal Judicial Nominations.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Wright, John R.. 1995. “Lobbying for Justice: The Rise of Organized Conflict in the Politics of Federal Judgeships.” In Contemplating Courts, ed. Epstein, Lee. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Pp. 44–71.10.4135/9781483329901.n3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., Cover, Albert D., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.” American Political Science Review 84(June):525–34.10.2307/1963533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Kenneth, and Sullivan, Terry. 1995. “New Evidence Undercutting the Linkage of Approval with Presidential Support and Influence.” Journal of Politics 57(February): 197–209.10.2307/2960278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Information Service, Inc. 1966–1995. CIS/Annual: Abstracts of Congressional Publications. Washington, DC: CIS.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly, Inc. 1966–1995. CQ Almanac, Annual issues. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly, Inc. 1993. CQ's Guide to Congress, 1992. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Reports. 1965–1994. Various issues. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III. 1980. Presidential Influence in Congress. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III, with Gallup, Alec M.. 1990. Presidential Approval: A Sourcebook. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1959. The President's Cabinet: An Analysis in the Period from Wilson to Eisenhower. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1991. Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the President, 3d ed., revised. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., MacLeod, Michael, and Talbert, Jeffrey. 1998. “Witnesses at the Confirmation? The Appearance of Organized Interests at Senate Hearings on Federal Judicial Appointments, 1945–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (September):605–18.10.1177/106591299805100303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R., and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 1993. “The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress.” American Political Science Review 87(September):657–71.10.2307/2938742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, James D., and Riddlesperger, James W.. 1991. “Senate Confirmation of Appointments to the Cabinet and Executive Office of the President.” Social Science Journal 28(April):189–202.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 2d ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lanier, Drew Noble 1995. “The Supreme Court Nominee Confirmation Process: Logit and Scobit Analyses in Two Neoinstitutional Contexts.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Tampa, Florida, November 1–4.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 1983. The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, G. Calvin. 1981. The Politics of Presidential Appointments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B. 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.” American Journal of Political Science 27(May):165–92.10.2307/2111014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis Who's Who, Inc. 1969–1997. Who's Who in America, annual issues, 1967–1968 to 1996. Chicago.Google Scholar
Massaro, John. 1990. Supremely Political: The Role of Ideology and Presidential Management in Unsuccessful Supreme Court Nominations. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1966–1995. The New York Times Index, annual issues. New York.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1996. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1995–1996. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W., and Simon, Dennis M.. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 79(June):334–58.10.2307/1956653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, Henschen, Beth M., Walsh, Michael H., and Strauss, Julie. 1992. “Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote of Justice Clarence Thomas.” American Political Science Review 86(December):997–1003.10.2307/1964351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Mark A. 1990. Legislating Together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Richard, and Vines, Kenneth N.. 1971. The Politics of Federal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rivers, Douglas, and Rose, Nancy. 1985. “Passing the President's Program: Public Opinion and Presidential Influence in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 29(May):183–96.10.2307/2111162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, Douglas, and Vuong, Quang H.. 1988. “Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models.” Journal of Econometrics 39(November):347–66.10.1016/0304-4076(88)90063-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470316696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckman, P. S. 1993. “The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process.” Journal of Politics 55(August):793–805.10.2307/2132002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scigliano, Robert G. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey. 1987. “Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices: Partisan and Institutional Politics.” Journal of Politics 49(November):998–1015.10.2307/2130781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mark, and Teske, Paul, with Mintrom, Michael. 1995. Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400821570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Harold W., and Niemi, Richard G.. 1994. Vital Statistics on American Politics, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. 1988 and 1992. United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Printing Office. 1966–1995a. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, 1965–1994. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Printing Office. 1966–1995b. Weekly Compilation on Presidential Documents, 1965–1994. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Government Printing Office. 1966–1995c. Congressional Record, various vols. 1965–94. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.