Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T16:00:43.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2011

JOHN G. BULLOCK
JOHN G. BULLOCK*
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
John G. Bullock is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, P.O. Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An enduring concern about democracies is that citizens conform too readily to the policy views of elites in their own parties, even to the point of ignoring other information about the policies in question. This article presents two experiments that undermine this concern, at least under one important condition. People rarely possess even a modicum of information about policies; but when they do, their attitudes seem to be affected at least as much by that information as by cues from party elites. The experiments also measure the extent to which people think about policy. Contrary to many accounts, they suggest that party cues do not inhibit such thinking. This is not cause for unbridled optimism about citizens' ability to make good decisions, but it is reason to be more sanguine about their ability to use information about policy when they have it.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 105 , Issue 3 , August 2011 , pp. 496 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., Sullivan, John L., and Borgida, Eugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz Before A Blind Audience?’” American Political Science Review 83 (March): 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan, and Snyder, James M. Jr., 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 102 (May): 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2008. “Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?” Political Behavior 30 (June): 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew A., and Groeling, Tim. 2009. “Shot by the Messenger: Partisan Cues and Public Opinion Regarding National Security and War.” Political Behavior 31 (June): 157–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, George F. 2005. The Illusion of Public Opinion. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bizer, George Y., Krosnick, Jon A., Holbrook, Allyson L., Petty, Richard E., Rucker, Derek D., and Wheeler, S. Christian. 2002. “The Impact of Personality on Political Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted A., and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2009a. “Follow the Leader: Party Cues, Partisans, and Public Opinion in Old and New Democracies.” Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted A., and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2009b. “What's Left Behind When the Party's Over: Survey Experiments on the Effects of Partisan Cues in Putin's Russia.” Politics and Policy 37 (August): 843–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Christopher R. 1992. Ordinary Men. New York: Harper/Perennial.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald. 1974. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E., Feinstein, Jeffrey A., and Jarvis, W. Blair G.. 1996. “Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (March): 197–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E., and Kao, Chuan Feng. 1984. “The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition.” Journal of Personality Assessment 48 (June): 306–07.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, John T., and Petty, Richard E.. 1981. “Social Psychological Procedures for Cognitive Response Assessment: The Thought-listing Technique.” In Cognitive Assessment, ed. Merluzzi, Thomas V., Glass, Carol R., and Genest, Myles. New York: Guilford Press, 309–42.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, and Maheswaran, Durairaj. 1994. “Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (March): 460–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coan, Travis G., Merolla, Jennifer L., Stephenson, Laura B., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2008. “It's Not Easy Being Green: Minor Party Labels as Heuristic Aids.” Political Psychology 29 (June): 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (November): 808–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Converse, Philip E. 2000. “Assessing the Capacity of Mass Electorates.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 331–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Fred. 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64 (May): 466–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DelliCarpini, Michael X. Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewan, Torun, Humphreys, Macartan, and Rubenson, Daniel. 2009. “The Impact of Leaders and the Messages They Convey.” London School of Economics. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2001. “Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing Effects.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (April): 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Ostermeier, Eric. 2004. “Candidate Strategies to Prime Issues and Image.” Journal of Politics 66 (November): 1180–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher, and Stimson, James A.. 2011 “Ideology in America.” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Estlund, David M. 2007. Democratic Authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1983. “Candidates, Issues, and Voters: The Role of Inference in Political Perception.” Journal of Politics 45 (November): 810–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis 15 (Winter): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1984. Processing the News. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2006. “Cognitive Style and Political Learning in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (September): 343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Hahn, Kyu S., Krosnick, Jon A., and Walker, John. 2008. “Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication.” Journal of Politics 70 (January): 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2000. “Who Says What? Source Credibility as a Mediator of Campaign Advertising.” In Elements of Reason, ed. Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jessee, Stephen A., and Rivers, Douglas. 2009. “Political Judgment under Uncertainty: Partisan Heuristics and Biases.” University of Texas at Austin. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (May): 339–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010a. “Health Tracking Poll, 2010 April 9–14.” http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/8067.cfm (accessed March 1, 2011).Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010b. “Health Tracking Poll, 2010 January 7–12.” http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/8042.cfm (accessed March 1, 2011).Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. 2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences.” Political Behavior 27 (June): 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr., 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–60. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. “Opinion and Action in the Realm of Politics.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Gilbert, Daniel T. and Fiske, Susan T.. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W., and Webster, Donna M.. 1996. “Motivated Closing of the Mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘Freezing.’” Psychological Review 103 (April): 263–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuklinski, James H., and Hurley, Norman L.. 1994. “On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-taking.” Journal of Politics 56 (August): 729–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2000. “Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion.” In Elements of Reason, ed. Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard P., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (October): 821–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2010. “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization.” Political Behavior 32 (March): 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, David A. 2005 April 7. “Missouri Medicaid Cuts Sent to Blunt.” Associated Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, and Aitkin, Don. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, Diane M., Gastardo-Conaco, M. Cecilia, and Skelly, John J.. 1992. “Knowledge of the Advocated Position and the Processing of In-group and Out-group Persuasive Messages.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 58 (April): 145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Diane M., Worth, Leila T., and Asuncion, Arlene G.. 1990. “Processing of Persuasive In-group Messages.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (May): 812–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malhotra, Neil, and Kuo, Alexander G.. 2008. “Attributing Blame: The Public's Response to Hurricane Katrina.” Journal of Politics 70 (January): 120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, William J. 1969. “The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot. 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, vol. 2, 136–314.Google Scholar
Meredith, Marc, and Grissom, Jason A.. 2010. “Partisanship in Local Elections: Regression Discontinuity Estimates from Unconventional School Board Races.” University of Pennsylvania. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., Stephenson, Laura B., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2007. “La Aplicación de los Métodos Experimentales en el Estudio de los Atajos Informativos en México.” Política y Gobierno 14 (1): 117–42.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., Stephenson, Laura B., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2008. “Can Canadians Take a Hint? The (In)effectiveness of Party Labels as Information Shortcuts in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (September): 673–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1993. “Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues.” Political Behavior 15 (June): 167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jaime L., and Jost, John T.. 2008. “Why Are Conservatives Happier than Liberals?” Psychological Science 19 (June): 565–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NBC News. 2009. “NBC News Poll, 2009 August 15–17.” http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/data_access/ipoll/ipoll.html (accessed March 1, 2011).Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Brody, Richard A.. 1972. “Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: The Vietnam War Issue.” American Political Science Review 66 (September): 979–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Michael T., and Isbell, Linda M.. 2010. “How I Vote Depends on How I Feel.” Psychological Science 21 (April): 548–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E., Schumann, David W., Richman, Steven A., and Strathman, Alan J.. 1993. “Positive Mood and Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persusasion in Presidential Campaigns. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2004. “Newspapers.” In The State of the News Media 2004. Washington, DC: Project for Excellence in Journalism.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1990. “Perception and Evaluation of Political Candidates: A Social-cognitive Perspective.” Ph.D. diss. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (May): 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, Ellen D., Ottati, Victor C., Wyer, Robert S., Kuklinski, James, and Schwarz, Norbert. 1992. “Bases of Political Judgments: The Role of Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Information.” Political Behavior 14 (March): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F., Streb, Matthew, and Wright, Gerald. 2001. “Teams without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (March): 7–30.Google Scholar
Slothuus, Rune, and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” Journal of Politics 72 (July): 630–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. 2000. “Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason, ed. Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Hagendoorn, Louk. 2007. When Ways of Life Collide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Smith, Eric R.A.N.. 1988. “The Effect of Partisan Information on Voters in Nonpartisan Elections.” Journal of Politics 50 (February): 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Michael H. 1987. “Ideology and Unstable Party Identification in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 20 (December): 813–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, and van Houweling, Robert P.. 2009. “The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review 103 (February): 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bullock supplementary material

Appendix

Download Bullock supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 460.6 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.