Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:29:24.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency, Equity, and Timing of Voting Mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

MARCO BATTAGLINI ,
REBECCA MORTON  and
THOMAS PALFREY
MARCO BATTAGLINI
Affiliation:
Princeton University
REBECCA MORTON
Affiliation:
New York University
THOMAS PALFREY
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compare the behavior of voters under simultaneous and sequential voting rules when voting is costly and information is incomplete. In many political institutions, ranging from small committees to mass elections, voting is sequential, which allows some voters to know the choices of earlier voters. For a stylized model, we generate a variety of predictions about the relative efficiency and participation equity of these two systems, which we test using controlled laboratory experiments. Most of the qualitative predictions are supported by the data, but there are significant departures from the predicted equilibrium strategies, in both the sequential and the simultaneous voting games. We find a tradeoff between information aggregation, efficiency, and equity in sequential voting: a sequential voting rule aggregates information better than simultaneous voting and is more efficient in some information environments, but sequential voting is inequitable because early voters bear more participation costs.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 409 - 424
Copyright
© 2007 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali Nageeb, and Navin Kartik. 2006. “A Theory of Information Cascades in Sequential Voting.” Working paper, University of California at San Diego.
Bartels Lawrence. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Battaglini Marco. 2005. “Sequential Voting with Abstention.” Games and Economic Behavior 51 (May): 445– 63.Google Scholar
Battaglini Marco, Rebecca Morton, and Thomas Palfrey. 2005. “Efficiency, Equity, and Timing in Voting Mechanisms.” Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Benjamini Yoav, and Yosef Hochberg 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57 (1): 289– 300.Google Scholar
Benjamini Yoav, and Daniel Yekutieli 2001. “The Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing under Dependency.” The Annals of Statistics 29 (August): 1165– 1188.Google Scholar
Bikhchandani Sushil David Hirshleifer, and Ivo Welch. 1992. “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (October): 992– 1026.Google Scholar
Borgers Tilman. 2004. “Costly Voting.” American Economic Review 94 (March): 57– 66.Google Scholar
Callander Steven. 2004. “Bandwagon and Momentum in Sequential Voting.” Mimeo. MEDS, Northwestern University.
Camerer Colin, Thomas Palfrey, and Brian Rogers. 2006. “Heterogeneous Quantal Response Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchies.” Social Science Working Paper # 1260, Caltech.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone Brandice Michael C. Herron, and Kenneth W. Shotts. 2001. “Leadership and Pandering: A Theory of Executive Policymaking.” American Journal or Political Science 45 (July): 532– 50.Google Scholar
Cohen Linda R., and Roger G. Noll 1991. “How to Vote, Whether to Vote: Decisions About Voting and Abstaining on Congressional Roll Calls.” Political Behavior 13 (June): 97– 127.Google Scholar
Dekel Eddie and Michele Piccione 2000. “Sequential Voting Procedures in Symmetric Binary Elections.” Journal of Political Economy 108 (February): 34– 55.Google Scholar
Feddersen Timothy and Wolfgang Pesendorfer 1997. “Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information.” Econometrica 65 (September): 1029– 58.Google Scholar
Fey Mark. 1998. “Informational Cascades and Sequential Voting.” Mimeo. University of Rochester, Dept. of Political Science.
Frankovic Kathleen. 2001. “Historical Perspective.” In CBS News Coverage of Election Night 2000: Investigation, Analysis, Recommendations, report prepared by Linda Mason, Kathleen Frankovic, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson for CBS News, pp. 51– 85.
Gerardi Dino, and Leeat Yariv. 2006. “Deliberative Voting.” Journal of Economic Theory in press.Google Scholar
Glazer Amihai Robert Griffin, Bernard Grofman, and Martin Watenberg. 1995. “Strategic Vote Delay in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (February): 37– 45.Google Scholar
Guarnaschelli Serena Richard McKelvey, and Thomas Palfrey. June 2000. “An Experimental Study of Jury Decision Rules.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 407– 424.Google Scholar
Hung Angela, and Charles Plott 2000. “Information Cascades: Replication and Extension to Majority Rule and Conformity-rewarding Institutions.” American Economic Review 91 (December): 1508– 20.Google Scholar
Jackson John. 1983. “Election Night Reporting and Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 27 (November): 615– 35.Google Scholar
Jones David R. 2003. “Position Taking and Position Avoidance.” Journal of Politics 65 (August): 851– 63.Google Scholar
Krasa Stefan, and Mattias Polborn. 2005. “Is Mandatory Voting Better Than Voluntary Voting.” Working paper. University of Illinois.
McKelvey Richard, and Thomas Palfrey 1995. “Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 10 (July): 6– 38.Google Scholar
McKelvey Richard, and Thomas Palfrey 1998. “Quantal Response Equilibria for Extensive Form Games.” Experimental Economics 1 (1): 9– 41.Google Scholar
Morton Rebecca B., and Kenneth C. Williams 1999. “Information Asymmetries and Simultaneous versus Sequential Voting.” American Political Science Review 93 (March): 51– 67.Google Scholar
Morton Rebecca B., and Kenneth C. Williams 2000. Learning by Voting: Sequential Choices in Presidential Primaries and Other Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Poole Keith, and Howard Rosenthal 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rothenberg Lawrence, and Mitchell Sanders 1999. “Rational Absention and the Congressional Vote Choice.” Economics and Politics 11 (November): 311– 40.Google Scholar
Rothenberg Lawrence, and Mitchell Sanders. 2000. “Legislator Turnout and the Calculus of Voting: The Determinants of Abstention in the U.S. Congress.” Public Choice 103 (June): 259– 70.Google Scholar
Shepard Alicia C. 2001. “How They Blew It,” American Journalism Review 23 (January/February): 20– 27.Google Scholar
Thomas Martin. 1991. “Issue Avoidance: Evidence from the U.S. Senate.” Political Behavior 13 (March): 1– 20.Google Scholar
Thompson Dennis F. 2004. “Election Time: Normative Implications of Temporal Properties of the Electoral Process in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98 (February): 51– 64.Google Scholar
Wit Jorgen 1997. “Herding Behavior in a Roll-Call Voting Game.” Mimeo. CREED, Dept. of Economics, University of Amsterdam.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.