Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Castromil, Antón R.
and
Chavero, Palmira
1970.
Polarización política y negativismo mediático. Similitudes y diferencias en la prensa de derecha y la de izquierda en las elecciones autonómicas y municipales de 2011.
Redmarka. Revista de Marketing Aplicado,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 08,
p.
55.
KLOTZ, ROBERT
1998.
Virtual Criticism: Negative Advertising on the Internet in the 1996 Senate Races.
Political Communication,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
347.
Sigelman, Lee
1999.
Publication Bias Reconsidered.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
201.
Gerber, Alan S.
and
Green, Donald P.
2000.
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 3,
p.
653.
Brazeal, LeAnn M.
and
Benoit, William L.
2001.
A functional analysis of congressional television spots, 1986–2000.
Communication Quarterly,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 4,
p.
436.
Franke, George R.
2001.
Applications of Meta-Analysis for Marketing and Public Policy: A Review.
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
186.
Lau, Richard R.
and
Pomper, Gerald M.
2001.
Negative Campaigning by US Senate Candidates.
Party Politics,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
69.
Richardson, Glenn W.
2001.
Looking for Meaning in All the Wrong Places: Why Negative Advertising Is a Suspect Category.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 4,
p.
775.
Bartle, John
and
Griffiths, Dylan
2001.
Political Communications Transformed.
p.
1.
Shen, Fuyuan
and
Wu, H. Denis
2002.
Effects of Soft-Money Issue Advertisements on Candidate Evaluation and Voting Preference: An Exploration.
Mass Communication and Society,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 4,
p.
395.
Goldstein, Ken
and
Freedman, Paul
2002.
Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 3,
p.
721.
Pfau, Michael
Holbert, R. Lance
Szabo, Erin Alison
and
Kaminski, Kelly
2002.
Issue-Advocacy versus Candidate Advertising: Effects on Candidate Preferences and Democratic Process.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 2,
p.
301.
Meirick, Patrick
2002.
Cognitive Responses to Negative and Comparative Political Advertising.
Journal of Advertising,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
49.
De Vreese, Claes H.
and
Semetko, Holli A.
2002.
Cynical and Engaged.
Communication Research,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 6,
p.
615.
Damore, David F.
2002.
Candidate Strategy and the Decision to Go Negative.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
669.
Hansen, Glenn J.
and
Benoit, William L.
2002.
Presidential television advertising and public policy priorities, 1952–2000.
Communication Studies,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 3,
p.
284.
Jasperson, Amy E.
and
Fan, David P.
2002.
An Aggregate Examination of the Backlash Effect in Political Advertising: The Case of the 1996 U.S. Senate Race in Minnesota.
Journal of Advertising,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Patterson, Kelly D.
and
Shea, Daniel M.
2003.
Local Political Context and Negative Campaigns.
Journal of Political Marketing,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Dermody, Janine
and
Scullion, Richard
2003.
Exploring the Consequences of Negative Political Advertising for Liberal Democracy.
Journal of Political Marketing,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
p.
77.
King, James D.
and
McConnell, Jason B.
2003.
The Effect of Negative Campaign Advertising on Vote Choice: The Mediating Influence of Gender*.
Social Science Quarterly,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 4,
p.
843.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.