Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:20:35.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard R. Lau ,
Lee Sigelman ,
Caroline Heldman  and
Paul Babbitt
Richard R. Lau
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Lee Sigelman
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Caroline Heldman
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Paul Babbitt
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The conventional wisdom about negative political advertisements holds that no one likes them, but they work, that is, they have the consequences their sponsors intend. Moreover, many analysts have expressed concern over the detrimental effects of such negativism on the American political system. We examine the accuracy of the conventional wisdom and the legitimacy of the fears about the consequences for the political system via meta-analysis, a systematic, quantitative review of the literature. The data do not support either contention. Negative political ads appear to be no more effective than positive ads and do not seem to have especially detrimental effects on the political system. Eleven subsidiary hypotheses about particular circumstances in which significant effects are likely to be found are tested and rejected. Discussion focuses on why negative political advertisements have become so popular in practice when there is so little evidence that they work especially well.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 851 - 875
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

*Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
*Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam, and Valentino, Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review 88 (December): 829–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Babbitt, Paul R., and Lau, Richard R. 1994. “The Impact of Negative Political Campaigns on Political Knowledge.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Barry, Thomas E. 1993. “Comparative Advertising: What Have We Learned in Two Decades?” Journal of Advertising Research 33 (March/April): 19–29.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Review of Going Negative, by Stephen Ansolabehere and Shanto Iyengar.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (Fall): 456–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Basil, Michael, Schooler, Caroline, and Reeves, Byron. 1991. “Positive and Negative Political Advertising: Effectiveness of Ads and Perceptions of Candidates.” In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Biocca, Frank. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 245–62.Google Scholar
Becker, Betsy Jane. 1994. “Combining Significance Levels.” In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, ed. Cooper, Harris and Hedges, Larry V.New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 215–29.Google Scholar
Begg, Colin B. 1994. “Publication Bias.” In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, ed. Cooper, Harris and Hedges, Larry V.New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 399–410.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brack, Reginald K. Jr. 1994. “How to Clean Up Gutter Politics.” New York Times, December 27, A21.Google Scholar
*Brians, Craig L., and Wattenberg, Martin P. 1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (February): 172–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, James. [1888] 1995. The American Commonwealth. 2 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Budesheim, Thomas L., Houston, David A., and DePaola, Stephen J. 1996. “Persuasiveness of In-Group and Out-Group Political Messages: The Case of Negative Political Campaigning.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (March): 523–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Bullock, David A. 1994. The Influence of Political Attack Advertising on Undecided Voters: An Experimental Study of Campaign Message Strategy. Ph.D. diss. University of Arizona.Google Scholar
*Capella, Louis, and Taylor, Ronald D. 1992. “An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Negative Political Campaigning.” Business and Public Affairs 18 (Spring): 10–7.Google Scholar
Chinoy, Ira. 1997. “In Presidential Race, TV Ads Were Biggest '96 Cost By Far.” Washington Post, March 31, A19.Google Scholar
Cooper, Harris, and Hedges, Larry V., eds. 1994. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Dimock, Michael A., and Jacobson, Gary C. 1995. “Checks and Choices: The House Bank Scandal's Impact on Voters in 1992.” Journal of Politics 57 (November): 1143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Finkel, Steven E., and Geer, John. 1998. “A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (April): 573–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1932. Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 4th ed. London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E. 1991. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
*Freedman, Paul, and Goldstein, Kenneth M. 1999. “Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (October):1189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Garramone, Gina M., Atkin, Charles T., Pinkleton, Bruce E., and Cole, Richard T. 1990. “Effects of Negative Political Advertising on the Political Process.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 34 (Summer): 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Geer, John G., and Lau, Richard R. 1998. “A New Way to Model the Effects of Campaigns.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Glass, Gene V., McGaw, Barry, and Smith, Mary Lee. 1981. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
*Goldstein, Kenneth M. 1997. “Political Advertising and Political Persuasion in the 1996 Presidential Campaign.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gronbeck, Bruce E. 1994. “Negative Political Ads and American Self Images.” In Presidential Campaigns & American Self Images, ed. Miller, Arthur H. and Gronbeck, Bruce E.Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 60–81.Google Scholar
*Haddock, Geoffrey, and Zanna, Mark P. 1997. “Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19 (June): 204–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Jon F., Fox, Jeffrey C., and Farmer, Rick. 1996. “Negative Advertisements in U.S. Senate Campaigns: The Influence of Campaign Context.” Social Science Quarterly 77 (June): 329–43.Google Scholar
Hale, Scott L. 1998. “Attack Messages and their Effects on Judgments of Political Candidates: A Random-Effects Meta-Analytic Review.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Haskins, Jack B. 1964. “Factual Recall as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Advertising Research 4 (January/February): 2–8.Google Scholar
Henneberger, Melinda. 1994. “As Political Ads Slither Into Negativity, the Real Venom Is Not Found on TV.” New York Times, October 30, Sec. 1.Google Scholar
*Hill, Ronald P. 1989. “An Exploration of Voter Responses to Political Advertisements.” Journal of Advertising 18 (Winter): 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hitchon, Jacqueline C., and Chang, Chingching. 1995. “Effects of Gender Schematic Processing on the Reception of Political Commercials for Men and Women Candidates.” Communication Research 22 (August): 430–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hitchon, Jacqueline C., Chang, Chingching, and Harris, Rhonda. 1997. “Should Women Emote? Perceptual Bias and Opinion Change in Response to Political Ads for Candidates of Different Genders.” Political Communication 14 (January): 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, John E., and Schmidt, Frank L. 1990. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Waldman, Paul, and Sherr, Susan. 1998. “Eliminate the Negative? Defining and Refining Categories of Analysis for Political Advertisements.” Paper presented at the Conference on Political Advertising in Election Campaigns, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
*Kahn, Kim Fridkin and Geer, John G. 1994. “Creating Impressions: An Experimental Investigation of Political Advertising on Television.” Political Behavior 16 (March): 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J. 1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American Political Science Review 93 (December): 877–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J. 1998b. “Negative Advertising and an Informed Electorate: How Negative Campaigning Enhances Knowledge of Senate Elections.” Paper presented at the Conference on Political Advertising in Election Campaigns, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Kaid, Lynda Lee. 1997. “Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton.” American Behavioral Scientist 40 (August): 1085–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Boydston, John. 1987. “An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Negative Political Advertisements.” Communication Quarterly 35 (Spring): 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Kaid, Lynda Lee, Chanslor, Mike, and Hovind, Mark. 1992. “The Influence of Program and Commercial Type on Political Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 36 (Summer): 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Johnston, Anne. 1991. “Negative Versus Positive Television Advertising in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–1988.” Journal of Communication 41 (Summer): 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaid, Lynda Lee, Leland, Chris M., and Whitney, Susan. 1992. “The Impact of Televised Political Ads: Evoking Viewer Responses in the 1988 Presidential Campaign.” Southern Speech Communication Journal 57 (Summer): 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamber, Victor. 1997. Poison Politics: Are Negative Campaigns Destroying Democracy?. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Kanetkar, Vinay, Evans, Martin G., Everell, Shirley Anne, Irvine, Diane, and Millman, Zeeva. 1995. “The Effect of Scale Changes on Meta-Analysis of Multiplicative and Main Effects Models.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 55 (April): 206–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrh, James A., and Halpern, David H. 1997. “Nothing to Lose? Assessing the Impact of Competitive Position on Responses to Negative Political Advertising.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Academy of Advertising, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
*King, Erika G., Hendersen, Robert W., and Chen, Hong C. 1998. “Viewer Response to Positive vs. Negative Ads in the 1996 Presidential Campaign.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 23–25, 1998.Google Scholar
Krauthammer, Charles. 1991. “Why Americans Hate Politicians.” Time, December 9, p. 92.Google Scholar
Laczniak, Gene R., and Caywood, Clarke L. 1987. “The Case For and Against Televised Political Advertising: Implications for Research and Public Policy.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 6 (Spring): 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Lang, Annie. 1991. “Emotion, Formal Features, and Memory for Televised Political Advertisements.” In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Biocca, Frank. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 221–44.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1985. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (February): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Pomper, Gerald, and Mazeika, Erlinda. 1995. “The Effects of Negative Campaigning.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
*Lau, Richard R., Pomper, Gerald, and Mumoli, Grace A. 1998. “Effects of Negative Campaigning on Senate Election Outcomes: 1988, 1990, 1994, and 1996.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 23–26, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard R., and Gaudet, Hazel. 1948. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
*Lemert, James B., Elliot, William R., Bernstein, James M., Rosenberg, William L., and Nestvold, Karl J. 1991. News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lin, Yang. 1996. “Empirical Studies of Negative Political Advertising: A Quantitative Review Using a Method of Combined Citation and Content Analysis.” Scientometrics 37 (September): 385–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Luskin, Robert C., and Bratcher, Christopher. 1994. “Negative Campaigning, Partisanship, and Turnout.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
*Martinez, Michael D., and Delegal, Tad. 1990. “The Irrelevance of Negative Campaigns to Political Trust: Experimental and Survey Results.” Political Communication and Persuasion 7 (January/March): 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Mathews, Douglas, and Dietz-Uhler, Beth. 1998. “The Black-Sheep Effect: How Positive and Negative Advertisements Affect Voters' Perceptions of the Sponsor of the Advertisement.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 (October 16): 1903–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, William G. 1996. “In Defense of Negative Campaigning.” Political Science Quarterly 111 (Fall): 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*McBride, Allan, Toburen, Robert, and Thomas, Dan. 1993. “Does Negative Campaign Advertising Depress Voter Turnout? Evidence from Two Election Campaigns.” Gambling State University. Typescript.Google Scholar
McCombs, Maxwell E., and Shaw, Donald L. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (Summer): 176–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Merritt, Sharyne. 1984. “Negative Political Advertising: Some Empirical Findings.” Journal of Advertising 13 (Fall): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, Banwari. 1994. “Public Assessment of TV Advertising: Faint Praise and Harsh Criticism.” Journal of Advertising Research 34! (January/February): 35–53.Google Scholar
Mosteller, Fred, and Bush, R. R. 1954. “Selected Quantitative Techniques.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, ed. Lindzey, Gardner. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 289–334.Google Scholar
Muehling, Darrel D., Stoltman, Jeffrey J., and Grossbart, Sanford. 1990. “The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Levels of Message Involvement.” Journal of Advertising 19 (Winter): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Negative Spots Likely to Return in Election ’88.” 1987. Advertising Age, September 14, Pp. 3, 70–8.Google Scholar
*Newhagen, John E., and Reeves, Byron. 1991. “Emotion and Memory Responses for Negative Political Advertising: A Study of Television Commercials Used in the 1988 Presidential Election.” In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Biocca, Frank. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 197–220.Google Scholar
Orwin, Robert G. 1983. “A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size.” Journal of Educational Statistics 8 (Summer): 157–9.Google Scholar
Perloff, Richard M., and Kinsey, Dennis. 1992. “Political Advertising as Seen by Consultants and Journalists.” Journal of Advertising Research 32 (May/June): 53–60.Google Scholar
*Pfau, Michael, Kenski, Henry C., Nitz, Michael, and Sorenson, John. 1989. “Use of the Attack Message Strategy in Political Campaign Communication.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Phillips, Joseph M., and Goss, Ernest P. 1995. “The Effect of State and Local Taxes on Economic Development: A Meta-Analysis.” Southern Economic Journal 62 (October): 320–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Pinkleton, Bruce. 1997. “The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations: An Exploration.” Journal of Advertising 26 (Spring): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Pinkleton, Bruce E. 1998. “Effects of Print Comparative Political Advertising on Political Decision-Making and Participation.” Journal of Communications 48 (Autumn): 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkleton, Bruce E., and Garramone, Gina M. 1992. “A Survey of Responses to Negative Political Advertising: Voter Cognition, Affect, and Behavior.” Proceedings of the 1992 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 127–33.Google Scholar
Purdum, Todd S. 1998. “Money Politics Wasn't Defeated in California.” New York Times June 7, Section 4, pp. 1, 4.Google Scholar
Putrevu, Sanjay, and Lord, Kenneth R. 1994. “Comparative and Noncomparative Advertising: Attitudinal Effects under Cognitive and Affective Involvement Conditions.” Journal of Advertising 23 (June): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., and Hirshorn, Rebecca. 1995. “Political Advertising and Public Mood: An Experimental Study of Children's Political Orientations.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Raju, Nambury S., Pappas, Sharon, and Williams, Charmon Parker. 1989. “An Empirical Monte Carlo Test of the Accuracy of the Correlation, Covariance, and Regression Slope Models for Assessing Validity Generalization.” Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (December): 901–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1997. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
*Roberts, Marilyn S. 1995. “Political Advertising: Strategies for Influence.” In Presidential Campaign Discourse: Strategic Communication Problems, ed. Kendall, Kathleen E.Albany: SUNY Press. Pp. 179–99.Google Scholar
*Roddy, Brian L., and Garramone, Gina M. 1988. “Appeals and Strategies of Negative Political Advertising.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 32 (Fall): 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roese, Neal J., and Sande, Gerald N. 1993. “Backlash Effects in Attack Politics.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23 (August): 632–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, John C., and Williams, Terrell G. 1989. “Comparative Advertising Effectiveness: Practitioners' Perceptions Versus Academic Research Findings.” Journal of Advertising Research 29 (October/November): 22–36.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Robert. 1979. “The ‘File Drawer’ Problem and Tolerance for Null Results.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (May): 638–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Schultz, Cindy, and Pancer, S. Mark. 1997. “Character Attacks and Their Effects on Perceptions of Male and Female Political Candidates.” Political Psychology 18 (March): 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Shapiro, Michael A., and Rieger, Robert H. 1992. “Comparing Positive and Negative Political Advertising on Radio.” Journalism Quarterly 69 (Spring): 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaperdas, Stergios, and Grofman, Bernard. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89 (March): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T. D., and Jarrell, Stephen B. “Meta-Regression Analysis: A Quantitative Method of Literature Surveys.” Journal of Economic Surveys 3 (April): 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Sulfaro, Valerie A. 1998. “Political Sophistication and the Presidential Campaign: Citizen Reactions to Campaign Advertisements.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
*Thorson, Esther, Christ, William G., and Caywood, Clarke. 1991. “Selling Candidates Like Tubes of Toothpaste: Is the Comparison Apt?” In Television and Political Advertising, Vol. 1, ed. Biocca, Frank. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 145–72.Google Scholar
*Thorson, Esther, Ognianova, Ekaterina, Coyle, James, and Denton, Frank. 1996. “Negative Political Ads and Negative Citizen Orientations Toward Politics.” University of Missouri. Typescript.Google Scholar
*Tinkham, Spencer F., and Weaver-Lariscy, Ruth Ann. 1991. “Advertising Message Strategy in U.S. Congressional Campaigns: Its Impact on Election Outcome.” Current Issues and Research in Advertising 13 (Spring–Summer): 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinkham, Spencer F., and Weaver-Lariscy, Ruth Ann. 1993. “A Diagnostic Approach to Assessing the Impact of Negative Political Television Commercials.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 37 (Fall): 377–400.Google Scholar
Tinkham, Spencer F., and Weaver-Lariscy, Ruth Ann. 1994. “Ethical Judgments of Political Television Commercials as Predictors of Attitude Toward the Ad.” Journal of Advertising 23 (September): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Wadsworth, Anne Johnston, Patterson, Philip, Kaid, Lynda Lee, Cullers, Ginger, Malcomb, Drew, and Lamirand, Linda. 1987. “ ‘Masculine’ vs. ‘Feminine’ Strategies in Political Ads: Implications for Female Candidates.” Journal of Applied Communication 15 (Spring and Fall): 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Wattenberg, Martin P., and Brians, Craig L. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?” American Political Science Review 93 (December): 891–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Weaver-Lariscy, Ruth Ann, and Tinkham, Spencer F. 1996. “Advertising Message Strategies in U.S. Congressional Campaigns: 1982, 1990.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 18 (Spring): 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Weigold, Michael F. 1992. “Negative Political Advertising: Individual Differences in Responses to Issue vs. Image Ads.” Proceedings of the 1992 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 145–9.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R. 1997. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990.” Journal of Politics 59 (February): 226–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Darrell M. 1993. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952–1992. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Will, George F. 1994. “Fingernails Across the Blackboard.” Newsweek, October 31, p. 72.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.