Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T20:12:57.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamics of Party Identification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Charles H. Franklin  and
John E. Jackson
Charles H. Franklin
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
John E. Jackson
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a model of individuals' party identification that contrasts with previous models. Past models, with the few recent exceptions noted, assume a hierarchical relationship either from identification to other aspects of political behavior, such as the perception and evaluation of issues and candidates, or from these behaviors to party identifications. The model discussed here places party within a dynamic concept of the electoral process and tests several hypotheses about factors producing changes in identifications. The first factor, consistent with the spatial-type issue voting models, estimates the effects of the relative proximity of each party to the individual's own policy preferences. Second, we examine the effect of the actual voting decision on subsequent identifications, with the expectation that if votes differ from previous identifications, there is a resulting shift in partisanship. Finally, we examine the hypothesis that identifications become less susceptible to change as people age and accumulate political experience. When combined with other research, the results indicate a model of the electoral process in which party identifications are both influenced by circumstances specific to each election and influence other behaviors. This nonrecursive model has a number of implications for the development and evolution of individual and aggregate partisanship. These implications are discussed at the end of the article.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 957 - 973
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E.The American voter. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E.Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies, 1969, 2, 139–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, P. E., & Markus, G. B.‘Plus ca Change…:’ The new CPS election study panel. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 2–49.Google Scholar
Dennis, J. On being an independent partisan supporter. Presented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, 04 15-18, 1981.Google Scholar
Downs, A.An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P.Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Franklin, C. H. Policy preferences and party identification. Presented at the 1982 Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego, California, 03 25-27, 1982.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E.Issues, party choices, and presidential voting. American Journal of Political Science, 1975a, 19, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. E.Issues and party alignment. In Maisel, L. and Sacks, P. M. (Eds.), The future of political parties. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1975b.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E. Issues and answers: Estimating individual's preferences with survey data. Presented to the 1979 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 09 3, 1979.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr.The responsible electorate. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lee, L. F.Simultaneous equation models with discrete and censored dependent variables. In Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D. (Eds.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981, pp. 346–364.Google Scholar
Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. E.A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 1055–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, R., & Zavoina, W.A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1975, 4, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, F., & Olson, L.Specification and estimation of a simultaneous-equation model with limited dependent variables. International Economic Review, 1978, 19, 695–709.Google Scholar
Page, B. I., & Jones, C. C.Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties, and the vote. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 1071–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, G. M.From confusion to clarity: Issues and American voters, 1956-1968. American Political Science Review, 1972, 66, 415–428.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H.A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 1980, 2, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.