Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:22:41.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

D. Scott Bennett
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Allan C. Stam III
Affiliation:
Yale University

Abstract

We present a model of war duration which incorporates both realpolitik and domestic political variables. We hypothesize that strategy, terrain, capabilities, and government type, among other variables, will play key roles in determining the duration of war. We test these hypotheses using hazard analysis and find empirical support for our key arguments. We find that the realpolitik variables play a greater role than regime behavior and type in determining war duration. We also find that historically, on average, mobilization and strategic surprise have little effect on war duration and that wars are not duration dependent.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, Paul D. 1984. Event History Analysis. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1979. “The Rational Timing of Surprise.” World Politics 31(January):228–46.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan. 1992. “Model Assessment and Choice via Cross-Validation.” Presented at the 1992 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Blainey, Geoffrey. 1988. The Causes of War, 3d ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1978. “Systemic Polarization and the Occurrence and Duration of War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 22(June):241–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Account Ability.” American Political Science Review 89(December):841–55.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Siverson, Randolph M., and Woller, Gary. 1992. “War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 86(September):638–46.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl Von. 1976 (1832). On War. Trans. Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Michael. 1992. Warfare and Armed Conflicts. 2 vols. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.Google Scholar
Dupuy, R. Ernest, and Dupuy, Trevor N.. 1986. The Encyclopedia of Military History from 3500 BC to the Present. 2d rev. ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Trevor Nevitt. 1979. Numbers, Predictions and War: Using History to Evaluate Combat Factors and Predict the Outcome of Battles. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Trevor Nevitt. 1983. Analysis of Factors That Have Influenced Outcomes of Battles and Wars: A Data Base of Battles and Engagements: Final Report. Vols. 1–6. Dunn Loring, VA: Historical Evaluation and Research Organization, Division of T.N. Dupuy Associates.Google Scholar
Epstein, Joshua M. 1987. Strategy and Force Planning: The Case of the Persian Gulf. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 1992. “Strategic Assessment in War: A Bounded Rationality Model of How Organizations Evaluate Policy Effectiveness.” Ph.D. diss, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul F.. 1993. “Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns.” International Studies Quarterly 37(June): 147–72.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 1992. LIMDEP, v. 6.0. New York: Econometric Software, Inc.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2d ed. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert, Jaggers, Keith, and Moore, Will H.. 1989. “Polity II data set, ICPSR 9263.” Boulder, CO. Photocopy.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Jackson, John E.. 1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, William J. 1968. “A Statistical Model for the Duration of Wars and Strikes.” Behavioral Science 13(January/February):1828.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul, Bennett, D. Scott, and Gelpi, Christopher. 1992. “System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict Among the Great Powers.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(September):478517.Google Scholar
Iklé, Fred Charles. 1971. Every War Must End. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies. Various years. The Military Balance. London: IISS.Google Scholar
Jaggia, Sanjiv. 1991a. “Specification Tests Based on the Heterogeneous Generalized Gamma Model of Duration: With an Application to Kennan's Strike Data.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 6(April-June):169–80.Google Scholar
Jaggia, Sanjiv. 1991b. “Tests of Moment Restrictions in Parametric Duration Models.” Economics Letters 37(September):3538.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, John D., and Prentice, Ross L.. 1980. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Nicholas M. 1988. “Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions.” Journal of Economic Literature 26(June):646–79.Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth. 1995. “Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars.” International Security 19(Spring):6593.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Tony. 1990. The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langer, William L. 1980. An Encyclopedia of World History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 1984. “Windows of Opportunity: Do States Jump Through Them?International Security 9(Summer): 147–76.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. 1987. Strategy. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1983. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. R., and Nicholson, Michael. 1983. “Rational Models and the Ending of Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 27(September): 495520.Google Scholar
Mitchell, William. 1921. Our Air Force: The Keystone of National Defense. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Morrison, Donald G., and Schmittlein, David C.. 1980. “Jobs, Strikes, and Wars: Probability Models for Duration.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25(April):224–51.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1985. “A Continuous-Outcome Expected Utility Theory of War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 29(September):473502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times. 1983. The New York Times World Atlas. New York: Times Publishing.Google Scholar
Organski, A.F.K., and Kugler, Jacek. 1980. The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pagan, Adrian, and Vella, Frank. 1989. “Diagnostic Tests for Models Based on Individual Data: A Survey.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 4(supplement):S29S59.Google Scholar
Petersen, Trond. 1986. “Fitting Parametric Survival Models with Time-Dependent Covariates.” Applied Statistics 35(No. 3):281–88.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Record, Jeffrey. 1993. Hollow Victory: A Contrary View of the Gulf War. McLean, VA: Brassey's (US).Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 1995. “Exploding the Powder Keg: Preemptive Wars Almost Never Happen.” International Security 20(Fall):534.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stephen Peter. 1995. “Military Effectiveness: Why Society Matters.” International Security 19(Spring):531.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1990. Controlling the Sword. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. 1986. “1914 Revisited: Allies, Offense, and Instability.” International Security 11(Fall):151–75.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John. 1972. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965.” In Peace, War and Numbers, ed. Russett, Bruce. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Small, Melvin, and Singer, J. David. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1984a. “Civil-Military Relations and the Cult of the Offensive, 1914 and 1984.” International Security 9(Summer):108–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack L. 1984b. The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stam, Allan C. III. 1995. “Strategy, Class and Ethnic Bias: Their Mutual Effects on War Outcomes and Durations.” Presented at the ISA annual meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stam, Allan C. III. 1996. Win, Lose, or Draw. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Various years. SIPRI Yearbook.Google Scholar
Tzu, Sun. 1991. The Art of War. London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. 1991. History and Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen W. 1984. “The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War.” International Security 9(Summer):58107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1994. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, Samuel, and Teachman, Jay. 1993. “The Duration of Wars, Strikes, Riots, and Family Arguments.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(September):544–68.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul V. 1992. “Rising Hazards: An Underlying Dynamic of Parliamentary Government.” American Journal of Political Science 36(December):857–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1979. “How a War Ends: A Rational Model Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 23(December):743–63.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, William. 1973. “Issue Area and Foreign-Policy Process: A Research Note in Search of a General Theory.” American Political Science Review. 67:1204–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.