Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:03:49.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cabal in Kabul: Great-Power Interaction in Afghanistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Shaheen F. Dil
Shaheen F. Dil*
Affiliation:
Mount Holyoke College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The July 17, 1973 coup serves as a case study of the nature and extent of great-power interest and involvement in Afghanistan. The dynamics of American, Soviet, and Chinese interaction are multifaceted and volatile, and imply that no one great power had outright control. Thus, this treatment concerns influence rather than control, and multilateral interaction rather than unilateral or bilateral action. The differing interests of the great powers in Afghanistan are outlined. Next, the possibility of great-power involvement in the coup is examined. Finally, the impact of the coup upon Afghanistan's relations with the three great powers is considered. Available material suggests that neither the United States nor the People's Republic of China had sufficient interest or influence to instigate the coup. Nor is there any concrete evidence that the Soviet Union played a significant role, although it did have the opportunity, influence, and interests to do so.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 468 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Upheaval in Kabul,” New York Times, July 20. 1973, p. 30 Google Scholar.

2 This article was originally written in January, 1974. Subsequent events have proved this supposition to be partially correct.

3 “Afghanistan Modernizing Hesitantly,” New York Times, June 7, 1973, p. 16 Google Scholar.

4 “U.S. and Afghans in a Map Project,” New York Times, August 23, 1973, p. 6 Google Scholar.

5 “Afghans Use U.S. Aid Project for Opium,” New York Times, May 26, 1973, p. 8 Google Scholar.

6 Quoted from a personal letter from Ambassador Robert G. Neumann to the author, dated May 19, 1975.

7 Ibid.

8 Dil, Shaheen F., “The Extent and Nature of Soviet Involvement in the Bangladesh Crisis,” Asia Quarterly, No. 3 (1973), 245 Google Scholar.

9 Pravda, February 28, 1971, p. 5 Google Scholar.

10 Pravda, September 15, 1971, pp. 1, 4 Google Scholar, and September 20, 1971, pp. 1, 3.

11 Pravda, December 14, 1971, p. 1 Google Scholar.

12 Pravda, March 22, 1972, pp. 1, 4 Google Scholar.

13 Pravda, June 21, 1972, p. 4 Google Scholar.

14 “Mobilising Afghan Resources Receives Priority,” Middle East Economic Digest, June 29, 1973, p. 738 Google Scholar.

15 “Afghanistan Faces an Uncertain Future,” Middle East Economic Digest, May 5, 1972, p. 493 Google Scholar.

16 Dai, Shen-yu, “China and Afghanistan,” The China Quarterly, No. 25 (January–March, 1966), 216 Google Scholar.

17 “Peking Reception Marks Tenth Anniversary of Signing of China-Afghanistan Treaty of Friendship and Mutual Non-Aggression,” August 25, 1970, in U.S. Consulate General, Hong Kong Google Scholar, Survey of China Mainland Press, August 31 –September 4, 1970, pp. 86–87 Google Scholar.

18 “Afghan King Inspects Chinese-Aid Projects,” December 9, 1970, in China Press, December 14–18, 1970, p. 80 Google Scholar.

19 “Chinese Minister of Foreign Trade Gives Banquet in Honor of Trade Delegation of Afghanistan,” December 23, 1970, in China Press, December 28–31, 1970, p. 157 Google Scholar.

20 “Afghan Ambassador to China Gives National Day Reception,” May 27, 1971, in China Press, June 7–11, 1971, p. 81 Google Scholar.

21 “Executions in Afghanistan ate Reported,” New York Times, July 19, 1973, p. 8 Google Scholar.

22 “Afghan Pledges No Subservience,” New York Times, July 26, 1973, p. 9 Google Scholar.

23 “Executions,” p. 8.

24 Weinraub, Bernard, “Two Weeks After Coup, Afghan Government Remains Paralyzed and Public Seems Mostly Apathetic,” New York Times, August 1, 1973, p. 13 Google Scholar.

25 “Afghan Pledges No Subservience,” p. 9.

26 “New Afghan Chief Revives Dispute,” New York Times, August 2, 1973, p. 6 Google Scholar.

27 Sulzberger, C. L., “New Fuse Burning in Asia,” New York Times, July 21, 1973, p. 27 Google Scholar.

28 “Promise of Substantial Aid from Iran Buoys Military Regime in Afghanistan,” New York Times, February 3, 1975, p. 4 Google Scholar.

29 “Afghan Pledges No Subservience,” p. 9.

30 “Kabul After Coup Quiet, Patroled,” New York Times, July 20, 1973, p. 5 Google Scholar.

31 For example, Weinraub, Bernard, “Two Weeks After Coup,” p. 13 Google Scholar.

32 Sulzberger, , “New Fuse Burning in Asia,” p. 27 Google Scholar.

33 Pravda, July 18, 1973, p. 5 Google Scholar.

34 It was reported in Peking on October 10, 1973 (“Afghan Ambassador Leaves Post,” China Press, October 23–26, 1973, p. 71 Google Scholar), that “Mohamed Osman Sidky, Ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of the Republic of Afghanistan to China, left his post for home today.” No further explanation was offered. As a new ambassador arrived in due course, it appears that this was not a formal act of diplomatic portent, but a routine change of representatives.

35 “Chinese Ambassador Holds National Day Reception in Kabul,” October 2, 1973, in China Press, October 15–19, 1973, p. 115 Google Scholar.

36 “Head of State of Afghanistan M. Daud Sends Message to Acting Chairman Tung Pi-wu on Chinese National Day,” October 3, 1973, in China Press, October 15–19, 1973, p. 116 Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.