Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:54:32.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucrats and Politicians in Policymaking: The Case of Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Michio Muramatsu  and
Ellis S. Krauss
Michio Muramatsu
Affiliation:
Kyoto University
Ellis S. Krauss
Affiliation:
Western Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article extends the recent empirical work on the perceptions and role of bureaucrats and politicians in policymaking. The question of the relationship between politicians and bureaucrats and the role of each in policymaking is especially important in the case of Japan, because the prevalent models of Japanese politics and policymaking are those of the “bureaucracy dominant” or of a closely interwoven “ruling triad” of bureaucracy, big business, and the governing Liberal Democratic Party.

Data are from a systematic survey of 251 higher civil servants and 101 members of the government and opposition parties in the House of Representatives, supplemented by data from other surveys and, wherever possible, compared to equivalent data from western democracies.

The results indicate that Japanese politicians and bureaucrats resemble Western European elites both in social background and in the fact that although the roles of politician and bureaucrat are converging, there are still differences in their contributions to the policymaking process. However, politicians influence policymaking more than most models of Japanese politics have posited, and even government and opposition politicians share some consensus about the most important policy issues facing Japan. A factor analysis demonstrated that higher civil servants' orientations toward their roles vary significantly with their positions in the administrative hierarchy.

The 27-year incumbency of the LDP as ruling party has been particularly important in determining the Japanese variant of the relationship between politicians and bureaucrats. We suggest that the Japanese case shows that the bureaucracy's increasing role in policymaking is universal; however, in late-modernizing political systems like Japan's, where the bureaucracy has always been a dominant actor, the growing power of politicians in postwar politics has been the most significant actor in bringing about more convergence in the two elites. Our data on this trend argue for a more complicated and pluralistic view of Japanese policymaking than that provided by either the bureaucracy-dominant or the ruling-triad model.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 126 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A.Bureaucrats and politicians in western democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. C.Policy conflict and conflict resolution within the governmental system. In Krauss, E. S., Rohlen, T. P., & Steinhoff, P. G. (Eds.), Conflict in Japan: studies of postwar society and politics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, in press.Google Scholar
Craig, A. M.Functional and disfunctional aspects of government bureaucracy. In Vogel, E. F. (Ed.), Modern Japanese organization and decision making. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Crozier, M.The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Curtis, G. L.Big business and political influence. In Vogel, E. (Ed.), Modern Japanese organizations and decision-making. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Dogan, M.The Mandarins of Western Europe. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1975.Google Scholar
Donnelly, M.Japan's rice economy: conflict over government authority and markets. In Krauss, E. S., Rohlen, T. P., & Steinhoff, P. G. (Eds.), Conflict in Japan: studies of postwar society and politics. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, in press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, C. Changes in belief systems, quality of life issues and social conditions over 25 years in postwar Japan. Paper presented at the Tenth World Congress of Sociology, Mexico City, August.19, 1982.Google Scholar
Hayashi, C., & Suzuki, T.Qualitative approach to cross-societal research: a comparative study of Japanese character. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 1975, 27, 1.Google Scholar
Ike, N.A theory of Japanese democracy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Ishida, T.Waga Kuni ni okeru Atsuryoku Dantai no Rekishiteki Joken to sono Tokushitsu. In Gakkai, Nippon Seiji (Ed.), Nippon no Atsuryoku Dantai. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1960.Google Scholar
Ito, D.Nippon Kanryo-sei no Bunseki. Tokyo: Todai Shuppan Kai, 1980.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.Japan: who governs? An essay on official bureaucracy. The Journal of Japanese Studies, Autumn 1975, 21–28.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. J.Japan: the government-business relationship. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1972.Google Scholar
Krauss, E. S.Japanese parties and parliament: changing leadership roles and role conflict. In MacDougall, T. E. (Ed.), Political leadership in contemporaryJapan. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, University of Michigan, 1982.Google Scholar
Kubota, A.Nihon Seifu Kōkan no Ishiki Kōzō. Chūō Kōron, 1977 02, 190–196.Google Scholar
Kubota, A. Kokusaiteki ni Mita Nihon no Kokyū Kanryō. Series of articles published monthly for over a year in Kankai, 1978–1979.Google Scholar
Kyogoku, J.Gendal Minshusei to Seiiigaku. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1969.Google Scholar
Masumi, J.Gendai Nippon no Seiji-Taisei, KeizaiTaisei. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1969.Google Scholar
Misawa, S.Seisaku Kettei Katei no Kaikan. In Kakkai, Nippon Seiji (Ed.), Gendai Nippon no Seitō to Kanryō. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1967.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M. Managing and influencing the Japanese legislative process: the role of parties and the national Diet. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1982.Google Scholar
Muramatsu, M.Sengo Nihon no Kanryōsei. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinpansha, 1981.Google Scholar
Najita, T.Japan. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
Otake, H.Gendai Nippon no Seiji Kenryoku, Keizai Kenryoku. Tokyo: Sanichi Shobo, 1979.Google Scholar
Otake, H. The politics of defense spending in conservative Japan. Paper presented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. New York, September.1981.Google Scholar
Otake, H., & Semi, Tohoku Daigaku Hogakubu Daigaku. Kankyō Gyōsei ni miru Gendai Nihon Seiji no Kenkyū. Chūō Kōron, 09 1982, 82–112.Google Scholar
Passin, H.The sources of protest in Japan. American Political Science Review, 1962, 56, 391–403.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J.The bureaucratization of policymaking in postwar Japan. American Journal of Political Science, 1974, 18, 647–664.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J.Patterns of Japanese policymaking: experiences from higher education. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. The Japanese parliament. Paper presented to Conference on Parliamentarians of the Research Committee on Political Sociology of the International Political Science Association, Madrid, December 1981.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J.Policy and politics in Japan: creative conservatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D.Bureaucrats and politicians: contending elites in the policy process. Tulane Studies in Political Science, 1973, 15, 179–202.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D.The political attitudes of senior civil servants in Britain, Germany, and Italy. In Dogan, M. (Ed.), The Mandarins of Western Europe. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1975.Google Scholar
Reischauer, E.The Japanese. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Jimukyoku, Rinji Gyosei Chōsakai. Rinchō Kihon Teigen. Tokyo: Gyosei Kenkyu Center, 1982.Google Scholar
Suleiman, E. N.Politics, power, and bureaucracy in France: the administrative elite. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Taguchi, F.Shakai Shūdan no Seijiteki Kino. Tokyo: Miraisha, 1969.Google Scholar
Tsuji, K.Shinpan Nihon Kanryōsei no Kenkyū. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Tsurutani, T.Political change in Japan. New York: David McKay, 1977.Google Scholar
Watanuki, J.Patterns of politics in present-day Japan. In Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives. New York: The Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Yanaga, C.Big business in Japanese politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.