Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:05:21.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Recent Court Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Developments in Health Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nos. 98-3651, 99-0311, 1999 WL 1243873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 1999).

2 See id. at *2.

3 See id. at *1.

4 FLA. STAT. § 455.667 (1997).

5 See Fischman, 1999 WL 1243873 at *1.

6 FLA. STAT. § 455.241 (1993).

7 Fischman, 1999 WL 1243873 at *1.

8 See id. at *2.

9 See Murawski, John, After Lawsuit, Humana Changes Records Policy, THE PALM BEACH POST, Jan. 24, 2000, at A1Google Scholar.

1 No. 184, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3926 (N.Y. Dec. 16, 1999).

2 See id. at *2.

3 N.Y. PUB. HEALTH LAW § 2807-d(2)(b)(ii) (McKinney 1992).

4 N.Y. PUB. HEALTH LAW § 2807-d(2)(b)(iii) (McKinney 1995).

5 See Wing, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3926 at *4.

6 See id. at *6.

7 See id. at *8.

8 505 U.S. 1, 12-13 (1992) (sustaining a 2% per year limitation in residential and commercial real property tax assessments with exceptions only for new construction or a change in ownership because of a State interest in “local neighborhood preservation, continuity, and stability,” its tendency to discourage turnover, and the differences in reliance interest between new and existing homeowners).

9 See Wing, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3962 at *12.

10 See id. at* 15.

11 See id. a t* 16-18.

1 198 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2000).

2 See id. at 1108.

3 See id.

4 See id.

5 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a) (1990).

6 Id. a t § 12111(8).

7 The Ninth circuit joined the Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits, declining to join the Second and Third Circuits. See Weyer, 198 F.3d at 1110-11.

8 See id. at 1111-12.

9 See id. at 1112.

10 42 U.S.C. § 12182(a).

11 See Weyer, 198 F.3d at 1114-16.

12 Id. at 1116.

13 See id. at 1116-17.

14 See id. at 1118-19.

15 See Schultz, Jill, The Impact of Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act on Employer- Provided Insurance Plans: Is the Insurance Company Subject to Liability?, 56 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 343, 353(1999)Google Scholar.

16 See Befort, Stephen F., Mental Illness and Long-Term Disability Plans Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, 2 U. PA. J. LAB. & EMPLOYMENT L. 287, 302 (1999)Google Scholar.

1 No. A-57, 2000 WL 61810 (N.J. Jan. 25, 2000).

2 See id. at *15.

3 Id. at *17.

4 See id. at * 1-2.

5 See Lopez v. Swyer, 300 A.2d 563 (1973).

6 See Lynch, 2000 WL 61810 at *2.

7 Id. at*13.

8 See id.

9 See id. at *14.

10 See id. at *9.

11 See id. at *10.

12 Id. at* 15.

13 Id. at *15.

14 See id. at *12.

15 Id. at*17.

1 120 S.Ct. 666(2000).

2 18 U.S.C. §§ 2721-2725 (1994 and Supp. III).

3 See Condon, 120 S.Ct. at 668.

4 See id. at 669 (citing Pub. L. No. 106-69, 113 Stat. 986, §§ 350 (c)-(e) (1999)).

5 See id. at 670.

6 505 U.S. 144 (1992).

7 521 U.S. 898 (1997).

8 485 U.S. 505 (1988).

9 Condon, 120 S.Ct. at 671.

10 See id.

11 Id. at 672.

12 Id. (quoting Baker, 485 U.S. at 514-515).

13 See id.