Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:03:35.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Recent Court Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Developments in Health Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 28 P.3d 151 (Cal. 2001).

2 Id. at 154.

3 Cal. Prob. Code § 2355 (West Supp. 2001).

4 Wendland, 28 P.3d at 167.

5 Id. at 154.

6 CAL. PROB, CODE § 2355(a) (West Supp. 2001).

7 Conservatorship of Drabick v. Drabick, 200 Cal. App. 3d 185 (1988).

8 Id. at 189.

9 Wendland, 28 P.3d at 168.

11 Wertdland, 28 P.3d at 172 (citing Matter of Conroy, 486 A.2d 1209, 1231-32 (N.J. 1985); 7/i re Martin, 538 N.W.2d 399, 413 (Mich. 1995); Matter of Edna M.F., 563 N.W.2d 485, 491-92 (Wis. 1997)).

12 Id.

13 Id. at 167.

14 Wendland, 28 P.3d at 175.

15 Id. at 172, 175.

1 781 A.2d 101 (Pa. 2001).

2 Id. at 103.

3 21 U.S.C. § 301 (2001).

4 21 U.S.C. § 360c(a)(l)(A)-(B) (2001).

5 21 U.S.C. § 360c(a)(l)(C) (2001).

6 21 U.S.C. § 360e(d)(2)(A)-(B) (2001).

7 Southard, 781 A.2d at 104.

8 Id. (citations omitted).

9 Id. (citations omitted).

11 Id.

12 Id. at 108.

13 Id.

14 Id. at *5 (citing 40 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1301.811-A (2001)).

15 Southard, 781 A.2d at 108.

16 Id. at 106.

17 Id. at 106-07.

18 Id. at 107.

19 Id. at 109.

2 Id. at 1141.

3 See id. at 1136 (noting that neither Massachusetts statutory authority or case law apply to the unique facts of this case).

4 MASS. Gen. LAWS ch. 209(C), § 1 (1998).

5 See Culliton, 756 N.E.2d at 1137.

6 MASS. Gen. LAWS ch. 210, § 2 (1998).

7 See Culliton, 756 N.E.2d at 1137-38 (distinguishing cases involving strictly gestational surrogacy agreements from traditional surrogacy agreements in which the gestational carrier has also donated her own ova to the adoptive couple).

8 MASS. Gen. LAWS ch. 46, § 4B (l 994).

10 Id. at 1139.

11 Id. at 1139-40.

12 Id. at 1140.

13 Id. at 1141 (requiring that the hospital identify the gestational carrier to the Department of Public Health or the Registrar of Vital Records and Statistics, and provide information concerning her prenatal health, labor and delivery, and postpartum care and condition).

14 Pamela Ferdinand, Mass. Case Tests Legal Standing of Surrogate, Genetic Mothers; Procedure for Placing Name on Birth Certificate Is at Issue, WASH. POST, Sept. 6, 2001, at A6 (reporting that Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders filed an amicus brief supporting the Cullitons’ case).

15 Culliton, 756 N.E.2d at 1139.

16 Id.

1 267 F.3d 45(1stCir. 2001).

2 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 94, § 307B (2000).

3 Philip Morris, 267 F.3d at 48.

4 Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 94, § 307B (2000).

5 Compare Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 95, § 307B with the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1341 (2001) (requiring only a list of ingredients in order to protect manufacturers’ trade secrets under the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905 (2001)).

6 Philip Morris, 267 F.3d at 50.

7 Id. at 52-54.

8 Id. at 52.

9 Id. at 59.

10 Id. at 60.

11 Id. at 62-63.

12 Id. at 64 (noting that the Disclosure Act does not impose mandates or restrictions on other states).

13 Id. at 63.

14 Id. at 65 (citing Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 (1970)).

15 Philip Morris, 267 F.3d at 66.

16 Id. at 67.