Article contents
A response to Allen Buchanan's views on decision making for terminally ill incompetents
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2021
Abstract
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 1979
References
1 Buchanan, Medical Paternalism or Legal Imperialism: Not the Only Alternatives in Saikewicz type Cases, 5 Am. J. L. & Med. 97 (1979)Google ScholarPubMed.
2 Relman, The Saikewicz Decision: A Medical Viewpoint, 4 Am. J. L. & Med. 233 (1978)Google Scholar.
3 Relman, The Saikewicz Decision: Judges as Physicians, 298 New England J. Med. 508 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Baron, Medical Paternalism and the Rule of Law: A Reply to Dr. Relman, 4 Am. J. L. & Med. 337 (1979)Google Scholar.
5 Relman, supra note 2, at 236, 237, 242.
6 Relman, supra note 3.
7 Buchanan, supra note 1, at 10.
8 Id.
9 Annas, Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: Decision Making for the Terminally Ill Incompetent, 4 Am. J. L. & Med. 367 (1979)Google Scholar.
10 Jackson, & Youngner, Patient Autonomy and “Death with Dignity“: Some Clinical Caveats, 301 New England J. Med. 404 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Cassell, Making and Escaping Moral Decisions, 1 Hastings Center Studies 53 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Jackson & Youngner, supra note 10.
13 Relman, supra note 2, at 242.
14 Relman, Michigan's Sensible Living Will, 300 New England J. Med. 1270 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Id.
- 5
- Cited by