Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:56:08.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Case Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2021

Jeffrey Hoffman ,
Lindsey Gabrielsen  and
Cong Yao
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Report
Information
American Journal of Law & Medicine , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 748 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fed. Trade Comm’n v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., 663 F.3d 1369 (11th Cir. 2011), cert. granted, 80 U.S.L.W. 3564 (U.S. Jun. 25, 2012) (No. 11-1160).

2 Id.

3 Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Fed. Trade Comm’n v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., No. 11-1160 (U.S. Mar. 23, 2012).

4 Phoebe Putney Health Sys., 663 F.3d at 1372.

5 GA. CODE ANN. § 31-7-72(a) (West 2012).

6 Id. § 31-7-75(7).

7 Phoebe Putney Health Sys., 663 F.3d at 1373.

8 Id.

9 Id.

10 Id.

11 Id. at 1374.

12 15 U.S.C. §§ 18, 21(a) (2006).

13 Phoebe Putney Health Sys., 663 F.3d at 1374.

14 Id.

15 Id. at 1374-75.

16 Id. at 1378 (quoting Fed. Trade Comm’n v. Hosp. Bd. of Dirs. of Lee Cnty., 38 F.3d 1184, 1187-88 (11th Cir. 1994)).

17 Petition for Writ of Certiorari, supra note 3.

18 Brief for the Petitioner at 32, Fed. Trade Comm’n v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., No. 11-1160 (U.S. Aug. 20, 2012).

19 Id. at 39.

20 Brief for the Respondent, Phoebe Putney Health Sys., No. 11-1160 (U.S. May 18, 2012)Google Scholar, available at http:/www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ftc-v-phoebe-putney-health-system-inc/.

21 Brief of the Petitioner, supra note 18, at 46 (quoting Patrick v. Burget, 486 U.S. 94, 101 (1988)).

22 Brief of the Respondent, supra note 20.

23 Id.

24 Brief for the Economic Professors as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Phoebe Putney Health Sys., No. 11-1160 (U.S. Aug. 20, 2012), available at http:/www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ftc-v-phoebe-putney-health-system-inc/.

25 Brief for the American Medical Association, et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party, Phoebe Putney Health Sys., No. 11-1160 (U.S. Aug. 27, 2012).

26 Brief for the American Antitrust Institute as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Phoebe Putney Health Sys., No. 11-1160 (U.S. Aug. 27, 2012).

27 Jeff Bliss, Supreme Court to Review Phoebe Putney Purchase of Palmyra, BLOOMBERG (June 25, 2012, 1:22 PM), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-25/supreme-court-to-review-phoebe-putney-purchase-of-palmyra.html.

28 Id.