Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:12:25.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telehealth for an Aging Population: How Can Law Influence Adoption Among Providers, Payors, and Patients?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Tara Sklar  and
Christopher T. Robertson
Tara Sklar
Affiliation:
Health Law & Policy Program, James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona
Christopher T. Robertson
Affiliation:
James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Telehealth continues to experience substantial investment, innovation, and unprecedented growth. However, telehealth has been slow to transform healthcare. Recent developments in telehealth technologies suggest great potential for chronic care management, mental health services, and care delivery in the home—all of which should be particularly impactful for an aging population with physical and cognitive limitations. While this alignment of technological capacity and market demand is promising, legal barriers remain for telehealth operators to scale up across large geographic areas. To better understand how federal and state law can be reformed to enable greater telehealth utilization, we review and extract lessons from (1) establishment of a healthcare relationship, (2) state licensure laws, and (3) reimbursement. We analyze these areas because of the legal ambiguities or inconsistencies they raise depending on the state, which seem to be hampering telehealth growth without necessarily improving quality of care. We propose several solutions for a more unified approach to telehealth regulation that incorporate core bioethics principles of doctor-patient relationship, competence, patient autonomy, as well as population-wide questions of resource allocation and access. Lawmakers should clarify that healthcare relationships may be established outside of in-person meetings, align licensure laws via an interstate compact or federal preemption, and expand Centers for Medicare and Medicaid plans to reimburse telehealth delivery in the home.

Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Law & Medicine , Volume 46 , Issue 2-3: Emerging Issues in Bioethics , May 2020 , pp. 311 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics Boston University School of Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 What is Telemedicine, Chiron Health, https://chironhealth.com/telemedicine/what-istelemedicine/ [https://perma.cc/PAU3-7S3X] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

2 Adler-Milstein, Julia et al., Telehealth Among US Hospitals: Several Factors, Including State Reimbursement and Licensure Policies, Influence Adoption, 33 Health Aff. 207, 207-15 (2014)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

3 Park, Jeongyoung et al., Are State Telehealth Policies Associated with the Use of Telehealth Services Among Underserved Populations?, 37 Health Aff. 2060, 2061 (2018)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4 Craig, John & Patterson, Victor, Introduction to the Practice of Telemedicine, 11 J. Telemedicine & Telecare 3, 4 (2005)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5 Why are Telemedicine and Telehealth So Important in Our Healthcare System?, Cal. elehealth Res. Ctr., http://www.caltrc.org/telehealth/why-are-telemedicine-and-telehealth-so-important-in-our-healthcare-system/ [https:/perma.cc/2GZQ-4L4W] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

6 Bashshur, Rashid L., Telemedicine and Health Care, 8 Telemedicine J. & e-Health 5, 7 (2002)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

7 See Bauerly, Brittney Crock et al., Broadband Access as a Public Health Issue: The Role of Law in Expanding Broadband Access and Connecting Underserved Communities for Better Health Outcomes, 47 J. Law, Med. & Ethics 39, 40 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (“Despite telehealth's great potential to improve healthcare access, the promise of telehealth is stymied by the lack of reliable broadband coverage in many parts of the United States.”).

8 Id. at 39.

9 Mapping Broadband Health in America, Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, https://www.fcc.gov/health/maps [https://perma.cc/8UFA-9BXL] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

10 See Ilene Warner, Telemedicine in Home Health Care: The Current Status of Practice, 10 Home Health Care Mgmt. & Prac. 62, 62-63 (Feb. 1998) (discussing the benefits of telemedicine without limitations on locale).

11 See Park et al., supra note 3, at 2066.

12 Ornstein, Katherine A et al., Epidemiology of the Homebound Population in the United States, 175 J. Am. Med. Ass'n: Internal Med. 1180, 1184 (2015)Google ScholarPubMed.

13 Social Isolation, Loneliness in Older People Pose Health Risks, Nat'l Inst. on Aging (Apr. 23, 2019), https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/social-isolation-loneliness-older-people-pose-health-risks [https://perma.cc/LX4N-A828].

14 Tara Sklar & Kathryn Huber, Frailty and Big Data: The Two Sides of Technology in ‘Personalised’ Elder Care, in Data Driven Personalisation and the Law: A Primer (Jacob Eisler & Uta Kohl eds.) (forthcoming 2020) (on file with authors).

15 Alley, Dawn E. et al., Accountable Health Communities – Addressing Social Needs Through Medicare and Medicaid, 374 N. Engl. J. Med. 8, 8 (2016)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

16 Uscher-Pines, Lori et al., Access and Quality of Care in Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine, 22 Telemedicine J. & e-Health 282, 282 (2016)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

17 See Ashwood, J. Scott et al., Direct-To-Consumer Telehealth May Increase Access to Care but Does Not Decrease Spending, 36 Health Aff. 485, 489-90 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Armaignac, Donna Lee et al., Impact of Telemedicine on Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost Among Patients in Progressive Care Units, 46 Critical Care Med. 728, 734 (2018)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

19 Kvedar, Joseph et al., Connected Health: A Review of Technologies and Strategies to Improve Patient Care with Telemedicine and Telehealth, 33 Health Aff. 194, 198 (2014)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

20 See Joyce, Geoffrey F. et al., The Lifetime Burden of Chronic Disease Among the Elderly, 24 Health Aff. 1, 8 (2005)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

21 Jonathan Vespa, The U.S. Joins Other Countries With Large Aging Populations, U.S. Census Bureau (Mar. 15, 2019), http://hispanicad.com/agency/research/us-joins-other-countries-large-aging-populations, [https://perma.cc/4BWQ-V7GZ].

22 Lassman, David et al., US Health Spending Trends by Age and Gender: Selected Years 2002–10, 33 Health Aff. 815, 821 (2014)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

23 Cathy Schoen et al., Medicare Beneficiaries' High Out-of-Pocket Costs: Cost Burdens by Income and Health Status, Commonwealth Fund (May 12, 2017), https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2017/may/medicare-beneficiaries-high-out-pocket-costs-cost-burdens-income [https://perma.cc/B3LS-UL8E].

24 Ben Umans & K. Nonnemaker, AARP Public Policy Inst., The Medicare Beneficiary Population: Fact Sheet 1 (2009).

25 Id.

26 Christopher T. Robertson, Exposed: Why Our Health Insurance is Incomplete and What Can Be Done About It 3, 161 (2019) (describing “underinsurance” as a cost-exposure out of proportion to the ability to pay, and thus, patients suffer just as if they lacked insurance coverage in the first place).

27 Healthy Aging Facts, Nat'l Council on Aging, https://www.ncoa.org/news/resources-for-reporters/get-the-facts/healthy-aging-facts/ [https://perma.cc/5MQF-ACE3] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

28 See Uscher-Pines et al., supra note 16.

29 See Gerd Flodgren et al., Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, Interactive Telemedicine: Effects on Professional Practice and Health Care Outcomes 7 (2015).

30 See Mehrotra, Ateev et al., Rapid Growth in Mental Health Telemedicine Use Among Rural Medicare Beneficiaries, Wide Variation Across States, 36 Health Aff. 909, 911, 916 (2017)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

31 Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention, The State of Mental Health and Aging in America 2 (2008) (noting that common mental health conditions include anxiety, severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and depression); Inst. of Med., Comm. on Mental Health Workforce for Geriatric Populations, The Mental Health and Substance Use Workforce for Older Adults: in Whose Hands? 159 (2012).

32 Bor, Jonathan S., Among the Elderly, Many Mental Illnesses Go Undiagnosed, 34 Health Aff. 727, 728 (2015)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

33 Id. at 727-28.

34 Id. at 727.

35 Id.

36 Bartels, Stephen J. & Naslund, John A., The Underside of the Silver Tsunami – Older Adults and Mental Health Care, 368 N. Engl. J. Med. 493, 493 (2013)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

37 Opioid Overdose: Drug Overdose Deaths, Ctrs. for Disease Control & Prevention (June 27, 2019), https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/statedeaths.html [https://perma.cc/BYP4-RX4C].

38 Press Release, Ctrs. for Medicare & Medicaid Servs., CMS Finalizes Polices to Bring Innovative Telehealth Benefit to Medicare Advantage (Apr. 5, 2019), https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-finalizes-policies-bring-innovative-telehealth-benefit-medicare-advantage [https://perma.cc/NWW5-PR5T] [hereinafter CMS Finalizes Polices to Bring Telehealth to Medicare Advantage].

39 Id.

40 Gretchen Jacobson et al., A Dozen Facts About Medicare Advantage in 2019, Kaiser Family Found. (June 6, 2019), https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/a-dozen-facts-about-medicare-advantage-in-2019 [https://perma.cc/H99T-QZU4].

41 Id.

42 Ateev Mehrotra, RAND Office of External Aff., Testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Health (May 1, 2014) (addressing the advantages and disadvantages of expanding the use of telehealth).

43 Park et al., supra note 3, at 2063.

44 Id.

45 Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, The Promise of Telehealth for Older People – the U-M National Poll on Healthy Aging, HealthPopuli (Oct. 3, 2019), https://www.healthpopuli.com/2019/10/03/the-promise-oftelehealth-for-older-people/ [https://perma.cc/6TKK-7Y3P].

46 Id.

47 Edward A. Miller, Nuffield Council Working Party, Telemedicine and the Provider-Patient Relationship: What We Know So Far 16-17 (2010).

48 Id. at 20.

49 Stavroulaki, Theodosia, Mind the Gap: Antitrust, Health Disparities and Telemedicine, 45 Am. J.L. & Med. 171, 179-89 (2019)Google ScholarPubMed.

50 Ctr. for Connected Health Policy, Telehealth Private Payer Laws: Impact and Issues 15 (2017) [hereinafter Telehealth Private Payer Laws].

51 See generally Kevin Outterson, Health Care, Technology, and Federalism, 103 W. Va. L. Rev. 503 (2000).

52 See generally Amar Gupta & Deth Sao, The Constitutionality of Current Legal Barriers to Telemedicine in the United States: Analysis and Future Directions of Its Relationship to National and International Health Care Reform, 21 Health Matrix: J.L. & Med. 385 (2011).

53 See Inst. of Med., Div. of Health Care Servs. Telemedicine: A Guide To Assessing Telecommunications For Health Care 229-38 (1996).

54 See 42 C.F.R. § 410.78 (2011) (defining when Medicare Part B will reimburse telehealth services).

55 See, e.g., Telehealth Modernization Act of 2015, H.R. 691, 114th Cong. (2015) (promoting the provision of telehealth by establishing federal standards for telehealth).

56 The Federal Trade Commission and Professional Licensure Boards, Nat'l Telehealth Policy Res. Ctr., https://www.cchpca.org/telehealth-policy/federal-trade-commission-and-professional-licensure-boards [https://YH54-EQDF] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

57 Id.

58 See id.

59 Park et al., supra note 3, at 2060-62.

60 Id. at 2064-65.

61 Id. at 2065.

62 See generally Zelda Di Blasi et al., Influence of Context Effects on Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review, 357 Lancet 757 (2001) (explicating both emotional and informational aspects of the doctor-patient relationship).

63 See, e.g., Telehealth Services in San Diego, Scripps (Feb. 24, 2020), https://www.scripps.org/news_items/6893-telehealth-services-in-san-diego [https://perma.cc/7LBL-KVDV] (offering online health questionnaires that providers subsequently review and prescribe a written care plan tailored to the patient within 30 minutes).

64 Press Release, U.S. Dep't of Justice (Apr. 9, 2019), https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-indictments-and-law-enforcement-actions-one-largest-health-care-fraud-schemes [https://perma.cc/B882-CK62].

65 See Miller, supra note 47, at 17.

66 See Am. Med. Ass'n, Coverage of and Payment for Telemedicine 1 (2015).

67 Id. at 1-2.

68 Am. Med. Ass'n, 50-state Survey: Establishment of a Patient-Physician Relationship via Telemedicine 1-2 (2018) [hereinafter 50-state Survey: Patient-Physician Relationship via Telemed]

69 Ark. Code Ann. § 17-80-403 (2019).

70 Utah Code Ann. § 58-32-101 (LexisNexis 2019); Utah Admin. Code r. 156-83-306 (2019).

71 Utah Code Ann. §§ 26-60-101, 26-60-102, 26-60-103 (LexisNexis 2019); Utah Admin. Code r. 156-1-602(6) (2019).

72 Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0880-02-.16 (2017).

73 Nicole Lewis, Telehealth Helps Close Health Care Disparity Gap in Rural Areas, Ass'n of Am. Med. Colls. (Dec. 5, 2016), https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/telehealth-helps-close-health-care-disparity-gap-rural-areas [https://perma.cc/T67G-NVAS] (noting that rural areas would be better served with the provision of telehealth services).

74 See, e.g., Allen v. Shawney, No. 11-10942, 2014 WL 1089618, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2014) (claiming deliberate indifference to medical needs constitutes a violation of patient Eighth Amendment rights). See generally Kuszler, Patricia C., Telemedicine and Integrated Health Care Delivery: Compounding Malpractice Liability, 25 Am. J.L. & Med. 297, 297-326 (1999)Google ScholarPubMed. Pro se prison cases are the exception.

75 See Perry v. Anonymous Physician 1, 25 N.E.3d 103, 107 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014); Dolezal v. Goode, 433 N.E.2d 828, 831 (Ind.Ct.App.1982). “In the usual negligence action the defendant's conduct is judged against what a reasonable man would do under the circumstances. But the determination in a medical malpractice case whether a physician's conduct fell below the legally prescribed standard of care involves questions of science and professional judgment that are outside the realm of the layperson. That is why, in an action for medical malpractice, whether the defendant used suitable professional skill must generally be proven by expert testimony, usually that of other physicians.” Perry, 25 N.E.3d at 107(citations omitted).

76 Bienz v. Central Suffolk Hospital, 557 N.Y.S.2d 139, 139-40 (1990).

77 See e.g., Vassos v. Roussalis, 658 P.2d 1284, 1288 (Wyo. 1983) (the standard of care was not the skill, diligence, knowledge, means, and methods “ordinarily” or “generally” or “customarily” exercised or applied, but rather are those that are “reasonably” exercised or applied.). See generally 1 Steven E. Pegalis, American Law of Medical Malpractice § 3.3 (3d. ed. 2019) (explaining how to measure reasonable care, custom, and practice in the medical profession in the common law context).

78 See Restatement (third) of Torts: Physical & Emotional Harm § 6 cmt. (d) (Am. Law Inst. 2019) (advising consideration of the expense of a precaution against its likelihood of reducing harm of a given severity); see also United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F. 2d 169, 173 (2d. Cir. 1947) (describing such a burden-probability-liability calculus); Kuszler, supra note 74, at 308 (arguing that “telemedicine presents the opportunity for the courts to recast the physician/provider-patient relationship and the duties that flow from it more flexibly”).

79 See Uscher-Pines, Lori et al., Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infections in Direct-to-Consumer Telehealth Visits, 175 J. Am. Med. Ass'n: Internal Med. 1234, 1234-35 (2015)Google Scholar.

80 See Shigekawa, Erin et al., The Current State of Telehealth Evidence: A Rapid Review, 37 Health Aff. 1975, 1975-76 (2018)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

81 United States Medical Licensure Requirements, U.S. Med. Licensing Examination, https://www.usmle-courses.eu/united-states-medical-licensure-requirements/ [https://perma.cc/2XSBPKLM] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

82 See generally Wynter K. Miller, Note, Trust and Antitrust: State-Based Restrictions in Telemedicine, 50 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1807 (2017).

83 Who is USMLE?, U.S. Med. Licensing Examination, https://www.usmle.org/about/ [https://perma.cc/ZZR9-CSJX] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

84 Obtaining a Medical License, Am. Med. Ass'n, https://www.ama-assn.org/education/obtaining-medical-license [https://perma.cc/K5LJ-CNHR] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

85 Id.

86 Gupta & Sao, supra note 52, at 399-400.

87 Id.

88 Filich, Marvin F., Incorporation to Circumvent Usury Laws: Associated Tax Problems and Law, 14 J. Corp. L. 527, 531 (1989)Google Scholar.

89 Ctr. for Connected Health Policy, State Telehealth Laws & Reimbursement Policies: A Comprehensive Scan of the 50 States & District of Columbia 10 (2019) [hereinafter State Telehealth Laws & Reimbursement Policies].

90 See, e.g., Ark. Code Ann. § 17-95-206 (2019) (defining such exchanges as “episodic” consultations).

91 See id.

92 State Telehealth Laws & Reimbursement Policies, supra note 89 (noting that nine states – Alabama, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, and Texas – allow an out-of-state provider to render services via telemedicine in a state where they are not located).

93 Orbuch, Paul M., A Western States' Effort to Address Telemedicine Policy Barriers, 73 N.D. L. Rev. 35, 47 (1997)Google Scholar.

94 The IMLC, Interstate Med. Licensure Compact, http://www.imlcc.org/ [https://perma.cc/L64E-BRSN] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020). The number of states in the IMLC is current as of April 2020.

95 Id.

96 Id.

97 Id.

98 Facts about the IMLCC, Interstate Med. Licensure Compact, https://imlcc.org/facts-about-the-imlcc/ [https://perma.cc/MG7Q-9URV] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

99 See Caleb Zimmerschied, Cross-state Licensing Process Now Live in 8 States, Am. Med. Ass'n (May 8, 2017), https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/cross-state-licensing-process-now-live-8-states [https://perma.cc/LJ5U-RCQK].

100 See Cohn, Ellen R. et al., Resolving Barriers to Licensure Portability for Telerehabilitation Professionals, 3 Int'l J. Telerehabilitation 31, 31 (2011)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

101 Nat'l Conference of State Legislators, Telehealth Policy Trends and Considerations 17 (2015).

102 See id. at 16.

103 Ameringer, Carl F., State-Based Licensure of Telemedicine: The Need for Uniformity but Not a National Scheme, 14 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 55, 58-59 (2011)Google Scholar.

104 See Gupta & Sao, supra note 52, at 417-27 (making this argument); see also Ass'n for Accessible Meds. v. Frosh, 887 F.3d 664, 670 (4th Cir. 2018) (finding that a pharmaceutical pricing statute violated the dormant commerce clause).

105 N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs v. FTC, 574 U.S. 494, 506-07 (2015) (no antitrust immunity for state professional boards unless directed by the state).

106 42 U.S.C. § 300e-10 (2018).

107 See Chaudhry, Humayun J. et al., Commentary, Maintenance of Licensure: Protecting the Public, Promoting Quality Health Care, 96 J. Med. Reg. 13, 13-14 (2010)Google Scholar.

108 42 U.S.C. § 300e-10.

109 Ctr. for Connected Health Policy, Sate Telehealth Laws & Reimbursement Policies, 9-10 (2019).

110 See Matthew Loughran, Telemedicine Reimbursement Laws Challenge Insurers and Providers Alike (Oct. 17, 2017) (8:30 AM), https://news.bloomberglaw.com/pharma-and-life-sciences/telemedicine-reimbursement-laws-challenge-insurers-and-providers-alike [https://perma.cc/9MWH-RPWR].

111 See Katherine Restrepo, The Case Against Telemedicine Parity Laws, John Locke Found. (Jan. 15, 2018), https://www.johnlocke.org/research/telemedicine/ [https://perma.cc/M48D-MK2C] (“Telemedicine parity laws force private insurance carriers to cover treatment via telemedicine that is otherwise covered during an in-office visit.”).

112 State Telehealth Laws & Reimbursement Policies, supra note 89, at 217, 390-91.

113 Wash. Rev. Code § 48.43.735(3)(g) (2020).

114 Telehealth Private Payer Laws, supra note 50, at 14.

115 Jacobson et al., supra note 40.

116 Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act of 2019, S. 2741, 116th Cong. (introduced in Senate, Oct. 30. 2019).

117 Id.

118 See Julia Paradise et al., Medicaid at 50, Kaiser Family Found. (May 6, 2015), https://www.kff.org/report-section/medicaid-at-50-the-elderly/ [https://perma.cc/J8VU-EC3W].

119 Sklar, Tara & Zuraw, Rachel, Preparing to Age in Place: The Role of Medicaid Waivers in Elder Abuse Prevention, 28 Annals Health L. & Sci. 195, 195 (2019)Google Scholar.

120 See Nat'l Conference of State Legislatures, supra note 101, at 13. See generally State Telehealth Laws & Reimbursement Policies, supra note 89, (surveying the telemedicine landscape across all 50 states among several metrics).

121 See id.

122 Nat'l Conference of State Legislators, supra note 101, at 12.

123 Health Homes, Medicaid.gov, https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/long-term-services-supports/health-homes/index.html [https://perma.cc/SL85-Y562] (last visited Mar. 20, 2020).

124 See discussion supra Part II.

125 Nat'l Conference of State Legislators, supra note 101, at 12.

126 See Inst. of Med., Comm. on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine, Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications for Health Care 229 (1996).

127 See 50-state Survey: Patient-Physician Relationship via Telemed, supra note 68.

128 See id.

129 See Nat'l Council on Aging, supra note 27.

130 Zimmerschied, supra note 99.

131 See CMS Finalizes Polices to Bring Telehealth to Medicare Advantage, supra note 38.