Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:20:39.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selected Recent Court Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Medicolegal Reference Library
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 105 S.Ct. 712 (1985).

2 “No otherwise qualified handicapped individual … shall, solely by reason of his handicap, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance ….” 29 U.S.C. § 794 (1985).

3 105 S.Ct. at 717-18.

4 Id. at 714.

5 Id. at 718.

6 Id. at 720.

7 442 U.S. 397 (1979).

8 105 S.Ct. at 720-21.

9 Id. at 722.

10 Id. at 724.

11 Id.

12 105 S.Ct. 1996 (1985).

13 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401-1467 (Supp. 1983).

14 105 S.Ct. at 1998.

15 id.

16 Id.

17 Id. at 1997.

18 Id. at 1996.

19 Id.

20 Id. at 1998 (citing 20 U.S.C. § 1401, 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.132, 300.27, 300.307(b), 300.347 (1984)).

21 20 U.S.C. § 1415(e)(2) (Supp. 1985).

22 105 S.Ct. at 2003 (1985).

23 20 U.S.C. § 1415(e)(3) (Supp. 1985).

24 105 S.Ct. at 2004.

25 Id. at 2005.

26 105 S.Ct. 2210 (1985).

27 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396(a)-(p) (1985).

28 105 S.Ct. at 2211.

29 Id.

30 Id.

31 Id.

32 Id. at 2211.

33 Id. at 2213.

34 Id.

35 Id. at 2214.

36 Id. at 2215.

37 S. Rep. No. 404, 89th Cong., 1st Session (1965).

38 105 S.Ct. at 2217.

39 Connecticut, Illinois, Minnesota, and California contested the Secretary's interpretation. Id. at 2212.

40 394 Mass. 131, 475 N.E.2d 65 (1985).

41 Id. at 138-39, 475 N.E.2d at 70.

42 21 C.F.R. § 130.45 (d)(l), 35 Fed. Reg. 9002, 9003 (1970), recodified at 21 C.F.R. § 310.501 (a)(4), 39 Fed. Reg. 11680 (1974), 40 Fed. Reg. 5354 (1975).

43 394 Mass, at 140, 475 N.E.2d at 71.

44 Id. at 133-34, 475 N.E.2d at 67.

45Id. at 134, 475 N.E.2d at 67.

46 Id. at 139, 475 N.E.2d at 70.

47 Id. at 135, 475 N.E.2d at 68.

48 W. at 136-37, 475 N.E.2d at 69.

49 W. at 138-39, 475 N.E.2d at 70.

50Id. at 139, 475 N.E.2d at 70.

51 Id. at 141, 475 N.E.2d at 71.

52 Id. at 137, 475 N.E.2d at 69.

53 359 Mass. 59, 479 N.E.2d 113 (1985).

54 Id. at 75, 479 N.E.2d at 115.

55 Id. at 61-62, 479 N.E.2d at 116.

56 Id. at 62, 479 N.E.2d at 116.

57 Id. at 66, 479 N.E.2d at 118.

58 Id. at 67, 479 N.E.2d at 199 (citing MASS. GI:N. LAWS Ann. ch. 111, §§ 70 70E (West (1983 Supp. 1985).

59 359 Mass, at 70-71, 479 N.E.2d at 121.

60 Id. at 72-73, 479 N.E.2d at 122.

61 Id. at 74, 479 N.E.2d at 123.

62 Id. at 66-67, 479 N.E.2d at 118-19 (citing Humphers v. First Interstate Bank, 298 Or. 706, 696 P.2d 527 (1985); Home v. Pattern, 291 Ala. 701, 708-09, 287 So. 2d 824 (1974); Simonsen v. Svvenson, 104 Neb. 224, 227, 177 N.W. 831 (1920); Hague v. Williams, 37 N.J. 328,336, 181 A.2d 345 (1962); MacDonald v. Clinger, 84 A.D.2d 482, 446 N.Y.S.2d 801 (N.Y. 1982); Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty Stir. Co., 243 F. Supp. 793, 802 (N.D. Ohio 1965).