Article contents
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58f47/58f4784834045f1a35711fb5335998f3bd74be2c" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Notes and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1954
References
1 Nürnberg: Rechtliche und Menschliche Probleme. By Dr. jur. August v. Knieriem. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, 1953. pp. xxv, 573. DM. 28.00.
2 Vol. 43 (1949), pp. 223 ff.
3 Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law (New York: Rinehart, 1952), pp. 239 ffGoogle Scholar.
4 It is interesting that Otto Meissner, the Staatssekretär of the Reichskanzlei, shares the reviewer’s opinion about the complete and absolute end of Germany as a state and of all her legalistic qualities as such, due to the unconditional surrender, although Meissner otherwise holds critical views identical with Knieriem’s. Cf. Meissner, Otto, Staatssekretär unter Ebert, Hindenburg, Hitler (Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe, 1950), p. 613Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by