Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:33:28.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Waiver of State Immunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Edwin D. Dickinson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1925 , pp. 555 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © by the American Society of International Law 1925

References

1 See Duke of Brunswick v. King of Hanover (1844), 6 Beav. 1, 40 (1848), 2 H. L. C. 1;Google ScholarWadsworth v. Queen of Spain (1851), 17 Q. B. 171;Google ScholarGladstone v. Ottoman Bank (1863), 1 H. & M. 505;Google ScholarHassard v. United States of Mexico (1899), 61 N. Y. Supp. 939.Google ScholarSee also The Schooner Exchange v. M'Faddon (1812), 7 Cr. 116;Google ScholarThe Parlement Beige (1880), L.R. 5 P. D.197.Google Scholar

2 Strousberg v. Republic of Costa Rica (1880), 44 L. T. R.199, 201.Google Scholar

3 The Gloria (1923), 286 Fed. 188, 194.Google Scholar

4 Colombian Government v. Rothschild (1826), 1 Sim. 94;Google ScholarHullet & Co. v. King of Spain (1828), 1 Dow & Clark 169;Google ScholarRepublic of Mexico v. Arrangois (1855), 11 How. Pr. 1;Google ScholarKing of Prussia v. Kuepper's Adm'r. (1856), 22 Mo. 550;Google ScholarUnited States of Americav. Wagner (1867), 86 L. J.Ch. N. S. 624.Google Scholar

5 Emperor of Brazil v. Robinson (1837), 6 A. & E. 801;Google ScholarRepublic of Costa Rica v. Erlanger (1876), 3 Ch. D. 62;Google ScholarVavasseur v. Krupp (1878), 9 Ch. D. 351;Google ScholarRepublic of Honduras v. Soto (1889), 112 N. Y.310.Google Scholar

6 King of Spain v. Hullet (1833), 1 C. & F. 333;Google ScholarRothschild v. Queen of Portugal (1839), 3 Y. & C.594;Google ScholarRepublic of Peru v. Weguelin (1875), L. R. 20 Eq. 140;Google ScholarRepublic of Costa Rica v. Erlanger (1875), 1 Ch. D. 171.Google ScholarIn Rothschild v. Queen of Portugal, 3 Y. & C.594, 596, Alderson, B., said: “Her Most Faithful Majesty being a suitor voluntarily in a Court of English law, becomes subject, as to all matters connected with that suit, to the jurisdiction of this Court of Equity.”Google Scholar

7 Strousberg v. Republic of Costa Rica (1880), 44 L. T. R.199.Google Scholar

8 The Newbattle (1885), 10 P. D.33.Google ScholarSee The Siren (1868), 7 Wall.152.Google Scholar

9 Kingdom of Roumania v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York (1918), 250 Fed. 341.Google Scholar

10 250 Fed. 341, 345.Google Scholar

11 South African Republic v. La Compagnie Franco-Beige du Chemin de Fer du Nord, [1897] 2 Ch. 487 [1898] 1 Ch. 190.Google Scholar

12 French Republic v. Inland Navigation Co. (1920), 263 Fed. 410.Google ScholarSee also Inre Patter-son-MacDonald Shipbuilding Co. (1923), 293 Fed. 192.Google Scholar

13 Kingdom of Norway v. Federal Sugar Refining Co. (1923), 286 Fed. 188.Google Scholar See 22 Michigan Law Review 455. See also Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. The Thekla (1924), 45 Sup. Ct. 112.Google Scholar

14 286 Fed. 188, 194.Google ScholarCompare Von Hellfeld v. Russian Government (1910), this Journal, Vol. V, p. 490.Google Scholar

15 Vavasseur v. Krupp (1878), 9 Ch. D. 351.Google Scholar

15a See The Sao Vicente (1922), 281 Fed. III, 114.Google Scholar

16 Taylor v. Best (1854), 14 C. B.487.Google Scholar

17 14 C. B.487, 525, 523.Google Scholar

18 In re Republic of Bolivia, Exploration Syndicate, Ltd., [1914] 1 Ch. 139.Google Scholar

19 In re Suarez, [1918] 1 Ch. 176.Google Scholar

20 [1894] 1 Q. B.149.Google Scholar

21 [1894] 1 Q. B.149, 159.Google Scholar

22 [1924] A. C.797.Google Scholar

23 See Hayes, “Private Claims Against Foreign Sovereigns,” 38 Harvard Law Review, 599.

24 In addition to the cases discussed above, see Porto Rico v. Rosaly (1913), 227 U. S.270;Google ScholarPorto Rico v. Ramos (1914), 232 U. S.627;Google ScholarRichardson v. Fajardo Sugar Co. (1916), 241 U. S.44.Google Scholar