No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Extending Copyright to Unprotected Works to Comply with Berne Convention
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65c92/65c92a8160c30718b6a3482a28e0f548baee9b06" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012
References
1 Justice Ginsburg wrote for the Court; Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Alito, dissented. Justice Kagan did not participate.
2 Adam Liptak, Public Domain Works Can Be Copyrighted Anew, Supreme Court Rules, N.Y. Times, Jan. 19, 2012, at B12.
3 Adam Liptak, Once in the Public’s Hands, Now Back in Picasso’s, N.Y. Times, Mar. 22, 2011, at A16; Adam Liptak, In Supreme Court Argument, A Rock Legend Plays a Role, N.Y. Times, Oct. 7, 2011, at B2.
4 U.S. CONST, art. I, §8, cl. 8 (“Congress shall have Power. . . [t] o promote the Progress of Science... by securing for limited Times to Authors. . . the exclusive Right to their . . . Writings.”).
5 Robert Barnes, Copyright Case Will Decide Fate of Millions of Once-Public Works, Wash. Post, Oct. 5, 2011, at A3.
6 Golan v. Holder, 132 S.Ct. 873, 875 (2012).
7 Id. at 884 (parallel citations omitted).
8 Id. at 891-92 (footnotes omitted).