No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
1 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010), cert, granted l32S. Ct. 472 (2011); See Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 105 AJIL 122, 142 (2011)Google Scholar.
2 28 U.S.C. §1350.
3 Kiobel, 621 F.3d at 117.
4 See Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 105 AJIL 775, 799 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 See Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 106 AJIL 138, 169 (2012)Google Scholar.
6 Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (Dec. 2011), avaibble at http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs/10-1491 _petitioner_amcu_unitedstates.authcheckdam.pdf.
7 Id. at 1.
8 Id. at 7.
9 Id. at 5-8.
10 Kiobel, 182 L. Ed. 2d 270, 270-71 (Mar. 5, 2012); see also http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-1491.htm.