Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:34:57.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

United States v. Gonzalez

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 19 U.S.C. §14010 (1982), incorporated by reference in section 2(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §955b(a).

2 See United States v. Romero-Galue, 757 F.2d 1147, 1153 (11th Cir. 1985).

3 776 F.2d 931, 935–37 (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 323, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. 11 (1979)).

4 The court also noted that the Act did not violate the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws, or the Convention on the High Seas, Apr. 29, 1958, 13 UST 2312, TIAS No. 5200, 450 UNTS 82.

5 776 F.2d at 938.

6 Id. at 939 (citing discussions of the protective principle in the Senate Report on the 1935 Anti-Smuggling Act, S. Rep. No. 1036, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 5 (1935), and in Church v. Hubbart, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 187, 235 (1804)).

7 776 F.2d at 939.

8 Id. (citing Restatement (Second) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States §33 (1965)).

9 776 F.2d at 940.

10 Id. at 937 n.8.